skip to main content
research-article

An Image of Society: Gender and Racial Representation and Impact in Image Search Results for Occupations

Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Algorithmically-mediated content is both a product and producer of dominant social narratives, and it has the potential to impact users' beliefs and behaviors. We present two studies on the content and impact of gender and racial representation in image search results for common occupations. In Study 1, we compare 2020 workforce gender and racial composition to that reflected in image search. We find evidence of underrepresentation on both dimensions: women are underrepresented in search at a rate of 42% women for a field with 50% women; people of color are underrepresented with 16% in search compared to an occupation with 22% people of color (the latter being proportional to the U.S. workforce). We also compare our gender representation data with that collected in 2015 by Kay et al., finding little improvement in the last half-decade. In Study 2, we study people's impressions of occupations and sense of belonging in a given field when shown search results with different proportions of women and people of color. We find that both axes of representation as well as people's own racial and gender identities impact their experience of image search results. We conclude by emphasizing the need for designers and auditors of algorithms to consider the disparate impacts of algorithmic content on users of marginalized identities.

References

  1. Joshua Asplund, Motahhare Eslami, Hari Sundaram, Christian Sandvig, and Karrie Karahalios. 2020. Auditing race and gender discrimination in online housing markets. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 24--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Derek R. Avery. 2003. Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising--are differences black and white? Journal of applied psychology 88, 4 (2003), 672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.672Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Derek R Avery, Sabrina D Volpone, Robert W Stewart, Aleksandra Luksyte, Morela Hernandez, Patrick F McKay, and Michelle (Mikki) R Hebl. 2013. Examining the draw of diversity: How diversity climate perceptions affect job-pursuit intentions. Human Resource Management 52, 2 (2013), 175--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Paul Baker and Amanda Potts. 2013. "Why do white people have thin lips?' Google and the perpetuation of stereotypes via auto-complete search forms. Critical Discourse Studies 10, 2 (2013), 187--204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012. 744320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Andrea Ballatore. 2015. Google Chemtrails: A Methodology to Analyze Topic Representation in Search Engine Results. First Monday 20, 7 (June 2015). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i7.5597Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Engin Bozdag. 2013. Bias in algorithmic "ltering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology 15, 3 (2013), 209--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Le Chen, Ruijun Ma, Anikó Hannák, and Christo Wilson. 2018. Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C. Plaut, Paul G. Davies, and Claude M. Steele. 2009. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97, 6 (2009), 1045. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Angèle Christin. 2017. Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data & Society 4, 2 (2017), 2053951717718855. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717718855Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Katheryn R Christy and Jesse Fox. 2014. Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women's math performance. Computers & Education 78 (2014), 66--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Harris Cohen. 2020. Bringing fact check information to Google Images. https://blog.google/products/search/bringingfact-check-information-google-images/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shelley J. Correll. 2004. Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations. American Sociological Review 69, 1 (2004), 93--113. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kate Crawford. 2017. The Trouble with Bias (NIPS 2017 Keynote). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMym_ BKWQzkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kimberlé Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum (1989), 139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. George B Cunningham and E Nicole Melton. 2014. Signals and cues: LGBT inclusive advertising and consumer attraction. Sport Marketing Quarterly 23, 1 (2014), 37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cathy Edwards. 2018. Making visual content more useful in Search. https://blog.google/products/search/makingvisual-content-more-useful-search/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Robert Epstein and Ronald E. Robertson. 2015. The Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME) and Its Possible Impact on the Outcomes of Elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 33 (Aug. 2015), E4512--E4521. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419828112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sheena Erete, Yolanda A Rankin, and Jakita O Thomas. 2021. I Can't Breathe: Reflections from Black Women in CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Adrienne Evans. 2015. Diversity in gender and visual representation: a commentary. Journal of Gender Studies 24, 4 (2015), 473--479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1047628Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Johan Fornäs. 1994. Mirroring meetings, mirroring media: The microphysics of reflexivity. Cultural Studies 8, 2 (1994), 321--340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389400490481Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Imagining intersectional futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 387--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ben Gomes. 2017. Our latest quality improvements for Search. https://blog.google/products/search/our-latest-qualityimprovements-search/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Amber M. Hamilton. [n.d.]. A Genealogy of Critical Race and Digital Studies: Past, Present, and Future. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity ([n. d.]), 2332649220922577. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220922577Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Anikó Hannák, Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Alan Mislove, Markus Strohmaier, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. In 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2017). Portland, OR.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Donna Haraway. 2013. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Matthew Kay, Cynthia Matuszek, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 3819--3828. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rene F Kizilcec, Andrew Saltarelli, Petra Bonfert-Taylor, Michael Goudzwaard, Ella Hamonic, and Rémi Sharrock. 2020. Welcome to the Course: Early Social Cues Influence Women's Persistence in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Juhi Kulshrestha, Motahhare Eslami, Johnnatan Messias, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Saptarshi Ghosh, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Karrie Karahalios. 2019. Search Bias Quantification: Investigating Political Bias in Social Media and Web Search. Information Retrieval Journal 22, 1--2 (April 2019), 188--227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-018-9341-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Asaf Levanon, Paula England, and Paul Allison. 2009. Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing Causal Dynamics Using 1950--2000 U.S. Census Data. Social Forces 88, 2 (12 2009), 865--891. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, James A. Landay, and Jeff Hancock. 2019. Search Media and Elections: A Longitudinal Investigation of Political Search Results in the 2018 U.S. Elections. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Danaë Metaxa-Kakavouli, Kelly Wang, James A. Landay, and Jeff Hancock. 2018. Gender-inclusive design: sense of belonging and bias in web interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Andrew A. Mitchell. 1986. The Effect of Verbal and Visual Components of Advertisements on Brand Attitudes and Attitude Toward the Advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research 13, 1 (06 1986), 12--24. https://doi.org/10.1086/209044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Perry L Moriearty. 2009. Framing justice: Media, bias, and legal decisionmaking. Md. L. Rev. 69 (2009), 849.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mary C Murphy, Claude M Steele, and James J Gross. 2007. Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological science 18, 10 (2007), 879--885.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. https://www.bls.gov/cps/aa2018/cpsaat11.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2020. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jahna Otterbacher, Alessandro Checco, Gianluca Demartini, and Paul Clough. 2018. Investigating user perception of gender bias in image search: the role of sexism. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 933--936. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210094Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Timothy D. Pippert, Laura J. Essenburg, and Edward J. Matchett. 2013. We've got minorities, yes we do: visual representations of racial and ethnic diversity in college recruitment materials. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 23, 2 (2013), 258--282. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2013.867920Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jean-Christophe Plantin, Carl Lagoze, Paul N. Edwards, and Christian Sandvig. 2018. Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society 20, 1 (2018), 293--310. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1461444816661553Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Victoria C Plaut, Flannery G Garnett, Laura E Buffardi, and Jeffrey Sanchez-Burks. 2011. ?What about me?" Perceptions of exclusion and Whites' reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of personality and social psychology 101, 2 (2011), 337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Valerie Purdie-Vaughns, Claude M Steele, Paul G Davies, Ruth Ditlmann, and Jennifer Randall Crosby. 2008. Social identity contingencies: how diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of personality and social psychology 94, 4 (2008), 615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Joy Buolamwini. 2019. Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 429--435. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ronald E. Robertson, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2018. Auditing the Personalization and Composition of Politically-Related Search Engine Results Pages. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18. ACM Press, Lyon, France, 955--965. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186143Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cédric Langbort. 2014. Auditing Algorithms: Research Methods for Detecting Discrimination on Internet Platforms. Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry 22 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Susan Leigh Star. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43, 3 (1999), 377--391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. statcounter [n.d.]. Search Engine Market Share Worldwide. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-shareGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Dafina-Lazarus Stewart. 2017. Language of Appeasement. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/03/30/collegesneed-language-shift-not-one-you-think-essay.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Elaine Swan. 2010. Commodity Diversity: Smiling Faces as a Strategy of Containment. Organization 17, 1 (2010), 77--100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508409350043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. Queue 11, 3, Article 10 (March 2013), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460276.2460278Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Francesca Tripodi. 2018. Searching for Alternative Facts. Technical Report. Data & Society. 64 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Image of Society: Gender and Racial Representation and Impact in Image Search Results for Occupations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
        CSCW
        April 2021
        5016 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3460939
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 April 2021
        Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader