skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Safe Sexting: The Advice and Support Adolescents Receive from Peers regarding Online Sexual Risks

Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The internet facilitates opportunities for adolescents to form relationships and explore their sexuality but seeking intimacy online has also become a stressor. As a result, adolescents often turn to the internet to seek support concerning issues related to sex because of its accessibility, interactivity, and anonymity. We analyzed 3,050 peer comments and 1,451 replies from adolescents (837 posts) who sought advice and/or support about online sexual experiences involving known others. We found peers mostly provided information and emotional support. They gave advice on how to handle negative online sexual experiences and mitigate their long-term repercussions, often based on their own negative experiences. They provided emotional support by letting teens know that they were not alone and should not blame themselves. A key implication of these findings is that these situations seemingly occurred regularly and youth were converging on a subset of norms about how to handle such situations in a way that supported one another. Yet, in some cases, they also resorted to victim-blaming or retaliating against those who broke these norms of "safe" sexting. Teens were grateful for emotional support and advice that helped them engage safely but were defensive when peers were critical of their relationships. Together, our findings suggest that youth are self-organizing to converge on guidelines and norms around safe sexting but have trouble framing their messages so that they are more readily accepted. In our paper, we contribute to the adolescent online safety literature by identifying youth-focused beliefs about safe sexting by analyzing the ways in which online peers give advice and support. We provide actionable recommendations for facilitating the exchange of positive advice and support via online peer-support platforms.

References

  1. Zainab Agha, Neeraj Chatlani, Afsaneh Razi, and Pamela Wisniewski. Towards Conducting Responsible Research with Teens and Parents regarding Online Risks. In CHI 2020 Extended Abstracts. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383073Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Daniel Romero. 2019. Self-declared Throwaway Accounts on Reddit: How Platform Affordances and Shared Norms enable Parenting Disclosure and Support. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1--30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359237Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2018. Social Support, Reciprocity, and Anonymity in Responses to Sexual Abuse Disclosures on Social Media. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 5: 1--35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234942Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016. Understanding Social Media Disclosures of Sexual Abuse Through the Lenses of Support Seeking and Anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 3906--3918. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Feona Attwood. 2007. Sluts and Riot Grrrls: Female Identity and Sexual Agency. Journal of Gender Studies 16, 3: 233--247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230701562921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Afsaneh Razi, Jan Edwards, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2020. Children's Perspectives on Human Sex Trafficking Prevention Education. In Companion of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '20), 123--126. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323994.3369889Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anita P. Barbee and Michael R. Cunningham. 1995. An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Annals of the International Communication Association 18, 1: 381--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jiang Bian, Yandong Liu, Eugene Agichtein, and Hongyuan Zha. 2008. A few bad votes too many? towards robust ranking in social media. In Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Adversarial information retrieval on the web (AIRWeb '08), 53--60. https://doi.org/10.1145/1451983.1451997Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Vesna Bili?. 2012. Violence among peers in the real and virtual world. Central European Journal of Paediatrics 9, 1: 78--90. https://doi.org/10.5457/p2005--114.65Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dawn O. Braithwaite, Vincent R. Waldron, and Jerry Finn. 1999. Communication of Social Support in Computer-Mediated Groups for People With Disabilities. Health Communication 11, 2: 123--151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1102_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 57--71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Amy Bruckman. 2002. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 3: 217--231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021316409277Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Munmun De Choudhury and Emre Kiciman. 2017. The Language of Social Support in Social Media and Its Effect on Suicidal Ideation Risk. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Retrieved April 2, 2020 from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15662Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Neil S. Coulson, Heather Buchanan, and Aimee Aubeeluck. 2007. Social support in cyberspace: A content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group. Patient Education and Counseling 68, 2: 173--178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Carolyn E. Cutrona and Julie A. Suhr. 1992. Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors. Communication Research 19, 2: 154--174. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Dana DeHart, Gregg Dwyer, Michael C. Seto, Robert Moran, Elizabeth Letourneau, and Donna Schwarz-Watts. 2017. Internet sexual solicitation of children: a proposed typology of offenders based on their chats, e-mails, and social network posts. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23, 1: 77--89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1241309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Cindy-Lee Dennis. 2013. Peer support for postpartum depression: volunteers' perceptions, recruitment strategies and training from a randomized controlled trial. Health Promotion International 28, 2: 187--196. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/das003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nicola Döring. 2014. Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 8, 1. Retrieved September 21, 2018 from https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4303Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Keith F. Durkin and Clifton D. Bryant. 1995. "Log on to sex": Some notes on the carnal computer and erotic cyberspace as an emerging research frontier. Deviant Behavior 16, 3: 179--200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1995.9967998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Nicole B. Ellison, Lindsay Blackwell, Cliff Lampe, and Penny Trieu. 2016. "The Question Exists, but You Don't Exist With It": Strategic Anonymity in the Social Lives of Adolescents. Social Media + Society 2, 4: 2056305116670673. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116670673Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Andrea Forte, Michael Dickard, Rachel Magee, and Denise E. Agosto. 2014. What do teens ask their online social networks?: social search practices among high school students. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14, 28--37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Stutzman Frederic and Hartzog Woodrow. 2012. Boundary regulation in social media. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristel M. Gallagher, John A. Updegraff, Alexander J. Rothman, and Linda Sims. 2011. Perceived Susceptibility to Breast Cancer Moderates the Effect of Gain-and Loss-Framed Messages on Use of Screening Mammography. Health psychology?: official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 30, 2: 145--152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Manuel Gámez-Guadix, Carmen Almendros, Esther Calvete, and Patricia De Santisteban. 2018. Persuasion strategies and sexual solicitations and interactions in online sexual grooming of adolescents: Modeling direct and indirect pathways. Journal of Adolescence 63: 11--18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tara Harris and Francois Steyn. 2018. Gender differences in adolescent online victimisation and sexting expectancies. Child Abuse Research in South Africa 19, 1: 15--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Heidi Hartikainen, Netta Iivari, and Marianne Kinnula. 2015. Children and Web 2.0: What They Do, What We Fear, and What Is Done to Make Them Safe. In Nordic Contributions in IS Research, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, Netta Iivari, Kari Kuutti, Anssi Öörni and Mikko Rajanen (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 30--43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--21783--3_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Heidi Hartikainen, Netta Iivari, and Marianne Kinnula. 2016. Should We Design for Control, Trust or Involvement? A Discourses Survey about Children's Online Safety. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16), 367--378. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Elsheikh A Hassan and George C Creatsas. 2000. Adolescent Sexuality: A Developmental Milestone or Risk-Taking Behavior? The Role of Health Care in the Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 13, 3: 119--124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083--3188(00)00045-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Susana Helm, Charlene K. Baker, Jeffrey Berlin, and Shaye Kimura. 2017. Getting In, Being In, Staying In, and Getting Out: Adolescents' Descriptions of Dating and Dating Violence. Youth & Society 49, 3: 318--340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15575290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Irit Hershkowitz, Omer Lanes, and Michael E. Lamb. 2007. Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged victims and their parents. Child Abuse & Neglect 31, 2: 111--123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sameer Hinduja and Justin W. Patchin. 2008. Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence 31, 1: 125--146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. S. M. Jourard. 1959. Healthy personality and self-disclosure. Mental Hygiene 43: 499--507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Melissa Kang and Susan Quine. 2007. Young people's concerns about sex: unsolicited questions to a teenage radio talkback programme over three years. Sex Education 7, 4: 407--420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810701636010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Jung-Eun Kim, Emily C. Weinstein, and Robert L. Selman. 2015. Romantic Relationship Advice From Anonymous Online Helpers: The Peer Support Adolescents Exchange. Youth & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15604849Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Nicole Anne Kinnane, Trish Waters, and Sanchia Aranda. 2011. Evaluation of a pilot "peer support' training programme for volunteers in a hospital-based cancer information and support centre. Supportive Care in Cancer 19, 1: 81--90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0791--3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. W. Kliewer, S. J. Lepore, A. Broquet, and L. Zuba. 1990. Developmental and gender differences in anonymous support-seeking: analysis of data from a community help line for children. American Journal of Community Psychology 18, 2: 333--339. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Panagiota Korenis and Stephen Bates Billick. 2014. Forensic Implications: Adolescent Sexting and Cyberbullying. Psychiatric Quarterly 85, 1: 97--101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-013--9277-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Derek A. Kreager and Jeremy Staff. 2009. The Sexual Double Standard and Adolescent Peer Acceptance: Social Psychology Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Maria Knight Lapinski and Rajiv N. Rimal. 2005. An Explication of Social Norms. Communication Theory 15, 2: 127--147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468--2885.2005.tb00329.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Paul Leedy D. and Jeanne Ormrod E. 2005. Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson. Retrieved June 1, 2020 from /content/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/us/en/higher-education/product.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Amanda Lenhart, Monica Anderson, and Aaron Smith. 2015. Teens, Technology and Romantic Relationships. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/10/01/teens-technology-and-romantic-relationships/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheri Madigan, Anh Ly, Christina L. Rash, Joris Van Ouytsel, and Jeff R. Temple. 2018. Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics 172, 4: 327. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Sheri Madigan, Vanessa Villani, Corry Azzopardi, Danae Laut, Tanya Smith, Jeff R. Temple, Dillon Browne, and Gina Dimitropoulos. 2018. The Prevalence of Unwanted Online Sexual Exposure and Solicitation Among Youth: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health 63, 2: 133--141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.03.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Deborah Mahlstedt and Linda Keeny. 1993. Female Survivors of Dating Violence and their Social Networks. Feminism & Psychology 3, 3: 319--333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353593033003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Elena Martellozzo. 2019. Chapter 4 - Online Child Sexual Abuse. In Child Abuse and Neglect, India Bryce, Yolande Robinson and Wayne Petherick (eds.). Academic Press, 63--77. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0--12--815344--4.00004-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Gagan Mehra. 2017. 105 Leading Social Networks Worldwide. Practical Ecommerce. Retrieved September 11, 2019 from https://www.practicalecommerce.com/105-leading-social-networks-worldwideGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Kimberly J. Mitchell, Lisa M. Jones, David Finkelhor, and Janis Wolak. 2014. Trends in Unwanted Online Experiences and Sexting. Crimes against Children Research Center., Durham, NH. Retrieved from https://scholars.unh.edu/ccrc/49/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosetta Moors and Ruth Webber. 2013. The dance of disclosure: Online self-disclosure of sexual assault. Qualitative Social Work 12, 6: 799--815. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325012464383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Anne C. Petersen, Nancy Leffert, and Barbara L. Graham. 1995. Adolescent development and the emergence of sexuality. Suicide & Life - Threatening Behavior; Washington 25: 4--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Bettina Piko. 2001. Gender Differences and Similarities in Adolescents' Ways of Coping. The Psychological Record 51, 2: 223--235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Anthony T. Pinter, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and Jack M. Caroll. 2017. Adolescent Online Safety: Moving Beyond Formative Evaluations to Designing Solutions for the Future. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17), 352--357. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Anthony T. Pinter, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and Jack M. Caroll. 2017. Adolescent Online Safety: Moving Beyond Formative Evaluations to Designing Solutions for the Future. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '17, 352--357. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Afsaneh Razi, Zainab Agha, Neeraj Chatlani, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2020. Privacy Challenges for Adolescents as a Vulnerable Population. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3587558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Afsaneh Razi, K. Badillo-Urquiola, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2020. Let's Talk about Sext: How Adolescents Seek Support and Advice about Their Online Sexual Experiences. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Afsaneh Razi, Seunghyun Kim, Munmun De Choudhury, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2019. Ethical Considerations for Adolescent Online Risk Detection AI Systems. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Retrieved January 10, 2021 from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3503956Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Afsaneh Razi and Pamela Wisniewski. 2019. Qualitative Analysis on Large Scale Social Media Data for Adolescent Online Safety. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Retrieved January 10, 2021 from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3503959Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Jessica Ringrose, Laura Harvey, Rosalind Gill, and Sonia Livingstone. 2013. Teen girls, sexual double standards and 'sexting': Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory 14, 3: 305--323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Alexander J. Rothman and Peter Salovey. 1997. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin 121, 1: 3--19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033--2909.121.1.3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Halina Sklenarova, Anja Schulz, Petya Schuhmann, Michael Osterheider, and Janina Neutze. 2018. Online sexual solicitation by adults and peers -- Results from a population based German sample. Child Abuse & Neglect 76: 225--236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.11.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Karen M. Staller and Debra Nelson-Gardell. 2005. "A burden in your heart": Lessons of disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect 29, 12: 1415--1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.06.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Stephanie. 2014. Cohen's Kappa Statistic. Statistics How To. Retrieved June 27, 2019 from https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/cohens-kappa-statistic/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Lalita K. Suzuki and Jerel P. Calzo. 2004. The search for peer advice in cyberspace: An examination of online teen bulletin boards about health and sexuality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25, 6: 685--698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Lalita K. Suzuki and Jerel P. Calzo. 2004. The search for peer advice in cyberspace: An examination of online teen bulletin boards about health and sexuality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25, 6: 685--698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Muhammad Uzair Tariq, Afsaneh Razi, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2019. A Review of the Gaps and Opportunities of Nudity and Skin Detection Algorithmic Research for the Purpose of Combating Adolescent Sexting Behaviors. In Human-Computer Interaction. Design Practice in Contemporary Societies (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 90--108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--22636--7_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. The Bark Team. Teen Text Speak Codes Every Parent Should Know. Bark. Retrieved June 26, 2019 from https://www.bark.us/blog/teen-text-speak-codes-every-parent-should-know/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Deborah L. Tolman and Sara I. McClelland. 2011. Normative Sexuality Development in Adolescence: A Decade in Review, 2000--2009: ADOLESCENT SEXUALITY. Journal of Research on Adolescence 21, 1: 242--255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532--7795.2010.00726.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Jessica Vitak and Jinyoung Kim. 2014. "You can't block people offline": examining how facebook's affordances shape the disclosure process. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14), 461--474. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531672Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Emily C Weinstein and Robert L Selman. 2016. Digital stress: Adolescents' personal accounts. New Media & Society 18, 3: 391--409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543989Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Tim Weninger, Thomas James Johnston, and Maria Glenski. 2015. Random Voting Effects in Social-Digital Spaces: A Case Study of Reddit Post Submissions. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media (HT '15), 293--297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700171.2791054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Marsha White and Steve M. Dorman. 2001. Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Education Research 16, 6: 693--707. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.693Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Helen Whittle, Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis, Anthony Beech, and Guy Collings. 2013. A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns. Aggression and Violent Behavior 18, 1: 62--70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Janis Wolak, David Finkelhor, Wendy Walsh, and Leah Treitman. 2018. Sextortion of Minors: Characteristics and Dynamics. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine 62, 1: 72--79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Tien Ee Dominic Yeo and Tsz Hang Chu. 2017. Sharing "Sex Secrets" on Facebook: A Content Analysis of Youth Peer Communication and Advice Exchange on Social Media about Sexual Health and Intimate Relations. Journal of Health Communication 22, 9: 753--762. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1347217Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Adolescence | Psychology Today. Retrieved February 4, 2020 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/basics/adolescenceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. An Exploratory Study about Inaccuracy and Invalidity in Adolescent Self-Report Surveys - Xitao Fan, Brent C. Miller, Kyung-Eun Park, Bryan W. Winward, Mathew Christensen, Harold D. Grotevant, Robert H. Tai, 2006. Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/152822X06289161Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Safe Sexting: The Advice and Support Adolescents Receive from Peers regarding Online Sexual Risks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2021
      5016 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3460939
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2021
      Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader