skip to main content
research-article

Sensemaking and Coping After Pregnancy Loss: The Seeking and Disruption of Emotional Validation Online

Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Emotional validation describes when one believes that their activities, emotions, beliefs, or other reactions are relevant and meaningful given the circumstance. When people experience distressing, stigmatizing life events, their state of emotional validation and thus their perceived sense of normalcy is often disrupted. Online spaces offer opportunities for coping, managing, and making sense of distress and stigma. In this paper, we focus on pregnancy loss as the context of inquiry and as an important example of a disruptive experience that is also associated with stigma. We examine how online spaces help facilitate or disrupt the process of achieving emotional validation among pregnancy loss survivors. We conducted in-depth interviews with women in the United States who had recently experienced a pregnancy loss. We found that individuals seeking a sense of perceived normalcy after pregnancy loss engage in two forms of validation processes that result in emotional validation - informational and experiential. We identified encounters that disrupt the process of seeking, achieving, and maintaining emotional validation related to: information, designs, algorithms, and interpersonal interactions. We introduce the concept of algorithmic symbolic annihilation to describe the representational and emotional harm participants experienced when they felt they were targets of algorithms assuming that all desired pregnancies proceed as expected. Algorithmic symbolic annihilation refers to how algorithms perpetuate normative and stereotypical narratives about phenomena, where what they account for has power and authority, and what they do not account for does not. To aid in seeking, achieving and sustaining emotional validation among pregnancy loss survivors, we suggest designing for 1) representational belonging to combat symbolic annihilation and 2) information avoidance.

References

  1. Nadin M. Abdel Razeq and Ekhlas Al-Gamal. 2018. Maternal Bereavement: Mothers' Lived Experience of Losing a Newborn Infant in Jordan. Journal of hospice and palliative nursing: JHPN: the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association 20, 2: 137--145. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000417Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Joan Ablon. 1981. Stigmatized health conditions. Social Science & Medicine. Part B: Medical Anthropology 15, 1: 5--9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90003-XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Annsofie Adolfsson. 2011. Meta-analysis to obtain a scale of psychological reaction after perinatal loss: focus on miscarriage. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 4: 29--39. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S17330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Annsofie Adolfsson, P. G. Larsson, Barbro Wijma, and Carina Bertero. 2004. Guilt and Emptiness: Women's Experiences of Miscarriage. Health Care for Women International 25, 6: 543--560. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330490444821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mona Y. Alqassim, K. Cassie Kresnye, Katie A. Siek, and Maria K. Wolters. 2019. Facebook for Support versus Facebook for Research: The Case of Miscarriage. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19), 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tawfiq Ammari, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Accessing Social Support and Overcoming Judgment on Social Media among Parents of Children with Special Needs. In Proceedings of ICWSM 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nazanin Andalibi. 2018. Self-Disclosure and Response Behaviors in Socially Stigmatized Contexts on Social Media. Drexel University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nazanin Andalibi. 2019. What Happens After Disclosing Stigmatized Experiences on Identified Social Media: Individual, Dyadic, and Social/Network Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300367Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. Symbolic annihilation through design: Pregnancy loss in pregnancy-related mobile apps. New Media & Society: 1461444820984473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820984473Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing Pregnancy Loss on Facebook: A Decision-Making Framework for Stigmatized Disclosures on Identified Social Network Sites. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2018), March. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Responding to Sensitive Disclosures on Social Media: A Decision-Making Framework. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 6: 31:1--31:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nazanin Andalibi, Gabriela Marcu, Tim Moesgen, Rebecca Mullin, and Andrea Forte. 2018. Not Alone?: Designing for Self- Disclosure and Social Support Exchange After Pregnancy Loss. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188473Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nazanin Andalibi, Margaret E. Morris, and Andrea Forte. 2018. Testing Waters, Sending Clues: Indirect Disclosures of Socially Stigmatized Experiences on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW: 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ifeyinwa V. Asiodu, Catherine M. Waters, Dawn E. Dailey, Kathryn A. Lee, and Audrey Lyndon. 2015. Breastfeeding and use of social media among first-time African American mothers. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing: JOGNN 44, 2: 268--278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12552Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lindsay Blackwell, Jean Hardy, Tawfiq Ammari, Tiffany Veinot, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. LGBT Parents and Social Media: Advocacy, Privacy, and Disclosure During Shifting Social Movements. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 610--622. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ann Blandford and Simon Attfield. 2010. Interacting with Information. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 3, 1: 1--99. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00227ED1V01Y200911HCI006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lyn Brierley-Jones, Rosalind Crawley, Samantha Lomax, and Susan Ayers. 2015. Stillbirth and Stigma: The Spoiling and Repair of Multiple Social Identities. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying 70, 2: 143--168. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.70.2.aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jed R. Brubaker, Gillian R. Hayes, and Paul Dourish. 2013. Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. The Information Society 29, 3: 152--163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Moira Burke and Mike Develin. 2016. Once More with Feeling: Supportive Responses to Social Sharing on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 1462--1474. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2835199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Moira Burke and Robert Kraut. 2013. Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. 1419--1430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Marsha Carolan and Rebecca J. Wright. 2017. Miscarriage at advanced maternal age and the search for meaning. Death Studies 41, 3: 144--153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2016.1233143Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Donald O. Case. 2007. Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Emerald Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Michelle Caswell, Marika Cifor, and Mario H. Ramirez. 2016. "To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing": Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives. The American Archivist 79, 1: 56--81. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.56Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Rosanne Cecil. 1994. "I wouldn't have minded a wee one running about": Miscarriage and the family. Social Science & Medicine 38, 10: 1415--1422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Xinlin Chen1 Lawrence Yang2 Josephina Toso-Salman Yvonne Chang, Rebekkah Schear, and Devon McGoldrick. 2016. Social Support within Online Communities: Internet Reach and Content Analysis of a Cancer Anti-stigma Facebook Page in Mexico. Global Media Journal. Retrieved August 2, 2017 from http://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/social-support-within-online-communitiesinternet-reach-and-content-analysis-of-acancer-antistigma-facebook-page-in-mexico.php?aid=68221Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D. Jean Clandinin. 2006. Narrative Inquiry: A Methodology for Studying Lived Experience. Research Studies in Music Education 27, 1: 44--54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X060270010301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Robin R. Means Coleman and Emily Chivers Yochim. 2008. Symbolic Annihilation. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication. American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecs124Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Flora Cornish, Alex Gillespie, and Tania Zittoun. 2014. Collaborative Analysis of Qualitative Data. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom, 79--93. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Elizabeth Victoria Eikey, Melissa Mazmanian, and Yunan Chen. 2018. Engaging with Health Data: The Interplay Between Self-Tracking Activities and Emotions in Fertility Struggles. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW: 40:1--40:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Tera L. Reynolds, Sean Victory, Kai Zheng, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Self-Tracking for Fertility Care: Collaborative Support for a Highly Personalized Problem. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW: 36:1--36:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134671Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Neil S. Coulson, Heather Buchanan, and Aimee Aubeeluck. 2007. Social support in cyberspace: a content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group. Patient Education and Counseling 68, 2: 173--178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. David Coyle, Conor Linehan, Karen Tang, and Sian Lindley. 2012. Interaction design and emotional wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts - CHI EA '12, 2775. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Elizabeth A. Crane, N. Sadat Shami, and Christian Peter. 2007. Let's get emotional: emotion research in human computer interaction. In CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '07, 2101. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1240958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mira Crouch and Heather McKenzie. 2006. The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information 45, 4: 483--499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Robert C. Davis, Ellen Brickman, and Timothy Baker. 1991. Supportive and unsupportive responses of others to rape victims: Effects on concurrent victim adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology 19, 3: 443--451. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Munmun De Choudhury. 2013. Role of social media in tackling challenges in mental health. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Socially-aware multimedia (SAM '13), 49--52. https://doi.org/10.1145/2509916.2509921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 3267--3276. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Michael A. DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2018. "Too Gay for Facebook": Presenting LGBTQ+ Identity Throughout the Personal Social Media Ecosystem. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW: 44:1--44:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sidney D'Mello and Rafael A. Calvo. 2013. Beyond the basic emotions: what should affective computing compute? In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13), 2287--2294. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sara M. Edlund, Maria L. Carlsson, Steven J. Linton, Alan E. Fruzzetti, and Maria Tillfors. 2015. I see you're in pain -- The effects of partner validation on emotions in people with chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain 6, 1: 16--21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Alison Ellis, Caroline Chebsey, Claire Storey, Stephanie Bradley, Sue Jackson, Vicki Flenady, Alexander Heazell, and Dimitrios Siassakos. 2016. Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 16, 1: 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0806-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Jennifer Leanne Fairchild. 2009. What might have been: The communication of social support and women's post-miscarriage narrative reconstruction. University of Kentucky, United States -- Kentucky. Retrieved October 8, 2015 from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy2.library.drexel.edu/docview/858610979/abstractGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Sara Fernández?Basanta, Carmen Coronado, and María-Jesús Movilla?Fernández. 2020. Multicultural coping experiences of parents following perinatal loss: A meta-ethnographic synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 76, 1: 9--21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Trevor Friedman and Dennis Gath. 1989. The psychiatric consequences of spontaneous abortion. The British Journal of Psychiatry 155, 6: 810--813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Alan Fruzzetti. 2006. The High-Conflict Couple: A Dialectical Behavior Therapy Guide to Finding Peace, Intimacy, and Validation. New Harbinger Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Pamela A. Geller. 2012. The role of emerging technology in women's response to pregnancy loss. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 7, 1: 19--23. https://doi.org/10.1586/eog.11.80Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Shelagh K. Genuis. 2012. Constructing "sense" from evolving health information: A qualitative investigation of information seeking and sense making across sources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 8: 1553--1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Shelagh K Genuis. 2014. "The transfer of information through word of mouth is powerful': interpersonal information interactions. Proceedings of ISIC, the Information Behaviour Conference: 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Shelagh K. Genuis and Jenny Bronstein. 2017. Looking for "normal": Sense making in the context of health disruption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, 3: 750--761. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. George Gerbner and Larry Gross. 1976. Living With Television: The Violence Profile. Journal of Communication 26, 2: 172--194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460--2466.1976.tb01397.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Lorna Gibson and Vicki L. Hanson. 2013. Digital Motherhood: How Does Technology Help New Mothers? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 313--322. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470700Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. David C. Giles and Julie Newbold. 2013. ?Is this normal?' The role of category predicates in constructing mental illness online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18, 4: 476--490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Erving Goffman. 1986. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon & Schuster, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Vanessa M. Christie, Annu Prabhakar, Asia L. Harris, and Katie A. Siek. 2016. Postpartum Health Information Seeking Using Mobile Phones: Experiences of Low-Income Mothers. Maternal and Child Health Journal 20, Suppl 1: 13--21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2185-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Vanessa M. Christie, Annu Prabhakar, and Katie A. Siek. 2017. Mind the Gap: Assessing the Disconnect Between Postpartum Health Information Desired and Health Information Received. Women's Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health 27, 2: 167--173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.11.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Oliver L Haimson. 2018. Social Media as Social Transition Machinery. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2: 26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Sarah Hardy and Rebecca Kukla. 2015. Making Sense of Miscarriage Online. Journal of Social Philosophy 46, 1: 106--125. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12089Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Gillian R. Hayes, Karen G. Cheng, Sen H. Hirano, Karen P. Tang, Marni S. Nagel, and Dianne E. Baker. 2014. Estrellita: A Mobile Capture and Access Tool for the Support of Preterm Infants and Their Caregivers. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21, 3: 19:1--19:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Nina Huntemann. 2015. No More Excuses: Using Twitter to Challenge The Symbolic Annihilation of Women in Games. Feminist Media Studies 15, 1: 164--167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.987432Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Sophia Alice Johnson. 2014. "Maternal Devices", Social Media and the Self-Management of Pregnancy, Mothering and Child Health. Societies 4, 2: 330--350. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4020330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Anette Kersting, Kristin Kroker, Sarah Schlicht, and Birgit Wagner. 2011. Internet-based treatment after pregnancy loss: concept and case study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 32, 2: 72--78. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2011.553974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Os Keyes. 2018. The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW: 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Jessica Killeen. 2015. The rules of bereavement work: emotion work in online perinatal loss support groups. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 15, 1: A16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S1-A16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Caroline Lafarge, Kathryn Mitchell, and Pauline Fox. 2013. Women's experiences of coping with pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality. Qualitative Health Research 23, 7: 924--936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313484198Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. L. L. Layne. 1990. Motherhood lost: cultural dimensions of miscarriage and stillbirth in America. Women & Health 16, 3--4: 69--98. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v16n03_05Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Linda L. Layne. 1997. Breaking the Silence: An Agenda for a Feminist Discourse of Pregnancy Loss. Feminist Studies 23, 2: 289--315. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Ronit D. Leichtentritt and Michal Mahat-Shamir. 2017. Mothers' Continuing Bond With the Baby: The Case of Feticide. Qualitative Health Research 27, 5: 665--676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315616626Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Irving G. Leon. 1992. When a Baby Dies: Psychotherapy for Pregnancy and Newborn Loss. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Marsha M. Linehan. 1997. Validation and psychotherapy. In Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 353--392. https://doi.org/10.1037/10226-016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Haley MacLeod, Grace Bastin, Leslie S. Liu, Katie Siek, and Kay Connelly. 2017. "Be Grateful You Don't Have a Real Disease": Understanding Rare Disease Relationships. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 1660--1673. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025796Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Lena Mamykina, Drashko Nakikj, and Noemie Elhadad. 2015. Collective Sensemaking in Online Health Forums. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 3217--3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702566Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Lena Mamykina, Arlene M. Smaldone, and Suzanne R. Bakken. 2015. Adopting the sensemaking perspective for chronic disease self-management. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 56: 406--417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Michael Massimi, Jill P. Dimond, and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2012. Finding a New Normal: The Role of Technology in Life Disruptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 719--728. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145314Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. M. Chad McBride. 2016. Communicating pregnancy loss: Narrative as a method for change. Women & Language 39, 1: 133--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Sadia Mir and Christina Paschyn. 2018. Qatar's Hidden Women: Symbolic Annihilation and Documentary Media Practice. Visual Communication Quarterly 25, 2: 93--105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2018.1456932Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Christine Moulder. 1994. Towards a Preliminary Framework for Understanding Pregnancy Loss. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 12, 1: 65--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Drashko Nakikj and Lena Mamykina. 2017. A Park or A Highway: Overcoming Tensions in Designing for Socio-emotional and Informational Needs in Online Health Communities. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1304--1319. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998339Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. C. Naumer, K. Fisher, and Brenda Dervin. 2008. Sense-Making: a methodological perspective. In Sensemaking Workshop, CHI'08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Nikki Newhouse. 2016. Bump2Bump: Online Peer Support in First-Time Pregnancy. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 239--243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2859021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Johnna Nynas, Puneet Narang, Murali K. Kolikonda, and Steven Lippmann. 2015. Depression and Anxiety Following Early Pregnancy Loss: Recommendations for Primary Care Providers. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders 17, 1. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.14r01721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. George Orwell. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-Four.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Sun Young Park. 2018. Social Support Mosaic: Understanding Mental Health Management Practice on College Campus. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18), 121--133. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196787Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Dilisha Patel, Ann Blandford, Mark Warner, Jill Shawe, and Judith Stephenson. 2019. "I feel like only half a man": Online Forums as a Resource for Finding a "New Normal" for Men Experiencing Fertility Issues. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 82:1--82:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359184Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Tamara Peyton. 2014. Pregnancy Ecologies As Teachable Moments For The Lifecourse: Changing The mHealth Design Paradigm. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '14), 269--271. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Tamara Peyton and Pamela Wisniewski. 2020. Improving a Design Space: Pregnancy as a Collaborative Information and Social Support Ecology. In Advances in Information and Communication, Kohei Arai and Rahul Bhatia (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 505--525. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12388-8_36Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Annu Prabhakar, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Anne Effron, Vanessa M. Kleinschmidt, Maggie Driscoll, Charles Peters, Vanessa Pereira, Majdah Alshehri, Tom Ongwere, and Katie A. Siek. 2017. "Let Me Know If You Need Anything"?: Support Realities of New Mothers. In Proceedings of Pervasive Health.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Annu Sible Prabhakar, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Vanessa M. Kleinschmidt, Ben Jelen, Haley MacLeod, Kay Connelly, and Katie A. Siek. 2017. Investigating the Suitability of the Asynchronous, Remote, Community-based Method for Pregnant and New Mothers. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17: 4924--4934. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025546Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Shriti Raj, Joyce M. Lee, Ashley Garrity, and Mark W. Newman. 2019. Clinical Data in Context: Towards Sensemaking Tools for Interpreting Personal Health Data. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 1: 22:1--22:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. David A. Savitz, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Charles Poole, and Andrew F. Olshan. 2002. Epidemiologic measures of the course and outcome of pregnancy. Epidemiologic Reviews 24, 2: 91--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2013. The Secret Life of Online Moms: Anonymity and Disinhibition on YouBeMom. com. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Katta Spiel, Oliver L Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to do better with gender on surveys: A guide for HCI researchers. ACM Interactions Magazine XXVI. Retrieved from https://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/july-august-2019/how-to-do-better-with-gender-on-surveysGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Kandi M. Stinson, Judith N. Lasker, Janet Lohmann, and Lori J. Toedter. 1992. Parents' Grief following Pregnancy Loss: A Comparison of Mothers and Fathers. Family Relations 41, 2: 218--223. https://doi.org/10.2307/584836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Kate Sweeny, Darya Melnyk, Wendi Miller, and James A. Shepperd. 2010. Information Avoidance: Who, What, When, and Why. Review of General Psychology 14, 4: 340--353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Gaye Tuchman. 2000. The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media. In Culture and Politics: A Reader, Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 150--174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Gaye Tuchman. 2000. The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media. In Culture and Politics: A Reader, Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 150--174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. James R. Wallace, Stacey D. Scott, and Carolyn G. MacGregor. 2013. Collaborative sensemaking on a digital tabletop and personal tablets: prioritization, comparisons, and tableaux. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3345--3354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109, 1: 121--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Alyson L. Young and Andrew D. Miller. 2019. "This Girl is on Fire": Sensemaking in an Online Health Community for Vulvodynia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Heping Zhang and Michael B. Bracken. 1996. Tree-based, Two-stage Risk Factor Analysis for Spontaneous Abortion. American Journal of Epidemiology 144, 10: 989--996. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Xiaomu Zhou, Si Sun, and Jiang Yang. 2014. Sweet Home: understanding diabetes management via a chinese online community. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 3997--4006. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sensemaking and Coping After Pregnancy Loss: The Seeking and Disruption of Emotional Validation Online

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader