skip to main content
research-article

Understanding Accessibility and Collaboration in Programming for People with Visual Impairments

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Human-Computer Interaction to understand the experiences of programmers in the workplace. However, the large majority of these studies has focused on sighted programmers and, as a result, the experiences of programmers with visual impairments in professional contexts remain understudied. We address this gap by reporting on findings from semi-structured interviews with 22 programmers with visual impairments. We found that programmers with visual impairments interact with a complex ecosystem of tools and a significant part of their job entails performing work to overcome the accessibility challenges inherent in this ecosystem. Furthermore, we find that the visual nature of various programming activities impedes collaboration, which necessitates the co-creation of new work practices through a series of sociotechnical interactions. These sociotechnical interactions often require invisible work and articulation work on the part of the programmers with visual impairments.

References

[1]
2019. Blindness Statistics. https://www.nfb.org/resources/blindness-statistics
[2]
2019. Stack Overfow Developer Survey Results 2019. https://insights.stackoverfow.com/survey/2019
[3]
Ali Abdolrahmani, William Easley, Michele Williams, Stacy Branham, and Amy Hurst. 2017. Embracing Errors: Examining How Context of Use Impacts Blind Individuals' Acceptance of Navigation Aid Errors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4158--4169. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025528
[4]
Khaled Albusays and Stephanie Ludi. 2016. Eliciting Programming Challenges Faced by Developers with Visual Impairments: Exploratory Study. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897616
[5]
Khaled Albusays, Stephanie Ludi, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2017. Interviews and Observation of Blind Software Developers at Work to Understand Code Navigation Challenges. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132550
[6]
Steve Alexander. 1998. Blind programmers face an uncertain future. ComputerWorld 32, 44 (1998), 86--87.
[7]
Paul R Amato and Julie Saunders. 1985. The perceived dimensions of help-seeking episodes. Social Psychology Quarterly (1985), 130--138.
[8]
Ameer Armaly, Paige Rodeghero, and Collin McMillan. 2018. Audiohighlight: Code skimming for blind programmers. Proceedings -2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, ICSME 2018 (2018), 206--216. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00030
[9]
Alberto Bacchelli and Christian Bird. 2013. Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 712--721.
[10]
Catherine M Baker, Cynthia L Bennett, and Richard E Ladner. 2019. Educational Experiences of Blind Programmers. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287410
[11]
Catherine M Baker, Lauren R Milne, and Richard E Ladner. 2015. StructJumper: A Tool to Help Blind Programmers Navigate and Understand the Structure of Code. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702589
[12]
Mark S Baldwin, Sen H Hirano, Jennifer Mankof, and Gillian R Hayes. 2019. Design in the Public Square: Supporting Assistive Technology Design Through Public Mixed-Ability Cooperation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--22.
[13]
Peter Bamberger. 2009. Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research. Research in personnel and human resources management 28, 1 (2009), 49--98.
[14]
Andrew Begel. 2008. Efecting change: Coordination in large-scale software development. In Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Cooperative and human aspects of software engineering. 17--20.
[15]
Edward C Bell and Natalia M Mino. 2015. Employment outcomes for blind and visually impaired adults. (2015).
[16]
Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility -ASSETS '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 161--173. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348
[17]
Cynthia L Bennett and Daniela K Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the" Other". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[18]
Cynthia L Bennett, Daniela K Rosner, and Alex S Taylor. 2020. The Care Work of Access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[19]
Jefrey P Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew Miller, Robert C Miller, Robin Miller, Aubrey Tatarowicz, Brandyn White, Samual White, et al. 2010. VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 333--342.
[20]
Brianna Blaser, Cynthia Bennett, Richard E. Ladner, Sheryl E. Burgstahler, and Jennifer Mankof. 2019. Perspectives of Women with Disabilities in Computing. Cambridge University Press, 159--182. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609081. 010
[21]
Erin L. Brady, Yu Zhong, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jefrey P. Bigham. 2013. Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work -CSCW '13. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1225. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441915
[22]
Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2373--2382. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123. 2702511
[23]
Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The InvisibleWork of Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility -ASSETS '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 163--171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864
[24]
Eric Brechner. 2003. Things they would not teach me of in college: what Microsoft developers learn later. In Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications. 134--136.
[25]
Robin N Brewer and Vaishnav Kameswaran. 2019. Understanding Trust, Transportation, and Accessibility through Ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
[26]
Sallyann Bryant, Pablo Romero, and Benedict du Boulay. 2008. Pair programming and the mysterious role of the navigator. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 7 (2008), 519--529.
[27]
Mary Elaine Calif, Mary Goodwin, and Jake Brownell. 2008. Helping Him See: Guiding a Visually Impaired Student through the Computer Science Curriculum.
[28]
Juliet M Corbin and Anselm L Strauss. 1993. The articulation of work through interaction. The sociological quarterly 34, 1 (1993), 71--83.
[29]
Nicola Cornally and Geraldine McCarthy. 2011. Help-seeking behaviour: A concept analysis. International journal of nursing practice 17, 3 (2011), 280--288.
[30]
D Crary. 2008. Employer bias thwarts many blind workers. Associated Press (2008).
[31]
Maitraye Das, Darren Gergle, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. "It doesn't win you friends" Understanding Accessibility in CollaborativeWriting for People with Vision Impairments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--26.
[32]
Guy Dewsbury, Karen Clarke, Dave Randall, Mark Rouncefeld, and Ian Sommerville. 2004. The anti-social model of disability. Disability & society 19, 2 (2004), 145--158.
[33]
Carolyn D Egelman, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Elizabeth Kammer, Maggie Morrow Hodges, Collin Green, Ciera Jaspan, and James Lin. 2020. Pushback: Characterizing and Detecting Negative Interpersonal Interactions in Code Review. (2020).
[34]
Hongfei Fan, Jiayao Gao, Hongming Zhu, Qin Liu, Yang Shi, and Chengzheng Sun. 2017. Balancing Confict Prevention and Concurrent Work in Real-Time Collaborative Programming. In Proceedings of the 12th Chinese Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 217--220.
[35]
Joan M Francioni and Ann C Smith. 2002. Computer science accessibility for students with visual disabilities. In Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. 91--95.
[36]
Vinitha Gadiraju. 2019. BrailleBlocks: Braille Toys for Cross-Ability Collaboration. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 688--690.
[37]
H. Garfnkel. 1991. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=zj_leg8-tIEC
[38]
David Garlan and Mary Shaw. 1993. An introduction to software architecture. In Advances in software engineering and knowledge engineering. World Scientifc, 1--39.
[39]
Erving Gofman et al. 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth London.
[40]
Alvin W Gouldner. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review (1960), 161--178.
[41]
Nancy Gourash. 1978. Help-seeking: A review of the literature. American journal of community psychology 6, 5 (1978), 413.
[42]
Rajesh Hegde and Prasun Dewan. 2008. Connecting programming environments to support ad-hoc collaboration. In 2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. IEEE, 178--187.
[43]
Ric Holt. 2002. Software architecture as a shared mental model. Proceedings of the ASERC Workhop on Software Architecture, University of Alberta (2002), 64.
[44]
Joe Hutchinson and Oussama Metatla. 2018. An Initial Investigation into Non-visual Code Structure Overview Through Speech, Non-speech and Spearcons. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188696
[45]
D. Izquierdo, N. Huesman, A. Serebrenik, and G. Robles. 2019. OpenStack Gender Diversity Report. IEEE Software 36, 1 (2019), 28--33.
[46]
Vaishnav Kameswaran, Jatin Gupta, Joyojeet Pal, Sile O'Modhrain, Tifany C Veinot, Robin Brewer, Aakanksha Parameshwar, and Jacki O'Neill. 2018. 'We can go anywhere' Understanding Independence through a Case Study of Ride-hailing Use by People with Visual Impairments in metropolitan India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--24.
[47]
Niall Kennedy. 2006. Google Mondrian: web-based code review and storage. https://www.niallkennedy.com/blog/ 2006/11/google-mondrian.html
[48]
Miryung Kim, Thomas Zimmermann, Robert DeLine, and Andrew Begel. 2016. The emerging role of data scientists on software development teams. In 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 96--107.
[49]
Tien Fabrianti Kusumasari, Iping Supriana, Kridanto Surendro, and Husni Sastramihardja. 2011. Collaboration model of software development. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics. IEEE, 1--6.
[50]
Reeti Mathur and Erin Brady. 2018. Mixed-Ability Collaboration for Accessible Photo Sharing. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 370--372.
[51]
Sean Mealin and Emerson Murphy-Hill. 2012. An exploratory study of blind software developers. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC. 71--74. https://doi.org/10.1109/ VLHCC.2012.6344485
[52]
Oussama Metatla, Alison Oldfeld, Taimur Ahmed, Antonis Vafeas, and Sunny Miglani. 2019. Voice user interfaces in schools: Co-designing for inclusion with visually-impaired and sighted pupils. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[53]
Richard J. Miara, Joyce A. Musselman, Juan A. Navarro, and Ben Shneiderman. 1983. Program Indentation and Comprehensibility. Commun. ACM 26, 11 (Nov. 1983), 861--867. https://doi.org/10.1145/182.358437
[54]
Jonas Moll and Eva-Lotta Sallnäs Pysander. 2013. A haptic tool for group work on geometrical concepts engaging blind and sighted pupils. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 4, 4 (2013), 1--37.
[55]
Jonas Moll, Kerstin Severinson-Eklundh, and Eva-Lotta Sallnas. 2007. Group Work About Geometrical Concepts Among Blind and Sighted Pupils Using Haptic Interfaces. In 2007 2nd Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems. 330--335.
[56]
Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, Anupama Dhareshwar, Kevin Doherty, Anja Thieme, and Alex Taylor. 2017. Imagining Artifcial Intelligence Applications with People with Visual Disabilities using Tactile Ideation. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 81--90.
[57]
Arie Nadler, Shmuel Ellis, and Iris Bar. 2003. To seek or not to seek: The relationship between help seeking and job performance evaluations as moderated by task-relevant expertise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33, 1 (2003), 91--109.
[58]
Mala D Naraine and Peter H Lindsay. 2011. Social inclusion of employees who are blind or low vision. Disability & Society 26, 4 (2011), 389--403.
[59]
John T Nosek. 1998. The case for collaborative programming. Commun. ACM 41, 3 (1998), 105--108.
[60]
Shotaro Omori and Ikuko Eguchi Yairi. 2013. Collaborative music application for visually impaired people with tangible objects on table. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--2.
[61]
Steve Oney, Alan Lundgard, Rebecca Krosnick, Michael Nebeling, and Walter S Lasecki. 2018. Arboretum and arbility: Improving web accessibility through a shared browsing architecture. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 937--949.
[62]
Dewayne E Perry, Nancy A. Staudenmayer, and Lawrence G Votta. 1994. People, organizations, and process improvement. IEEE Software 11, 4 (1994), 36--45.
[63]
Vanessa Petrausch and Claudia Loitsch. 2017. Accessibility Analysis of the Eclipse IDE for Users with Visual Impairment. (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-798-6-922
[64]
Venkatesh Potluri, Priyan Vaithilingam, Suresh Iyengar, Y Vidya, Manohar Swaminathan, and Gopal Srinivasa. 2018. Codetalk: Improving programming environment accessibility for visually impaired developers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
[65]
Caitlin Sadowski, Emma Söderberg, Luke Church, Michal Sipko, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2018. Modern code review: a case study at google. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice. 181--190.
[66]
Johnny Saldaña. 2015. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
[67]
Emmanuel Schanzer, Sina Bahram, and Shriram Krishnamurthi. 2019. Accessible AST-Based Programming for Visually-Impaired Programmers. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education SIGCSE '19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 773--779. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287499
[68]
Helen Sharp, Robert Biddle, Phil Gray, Lynn Miller, and Jef Patton. 2006. Agile Development: Opportunity or Fad?. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI EA '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 32--35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125461
[69]
Kristen Shinohara, Cynthia L. Bennett, Wanda Pratt, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2018. Tenets for Social Accessibility: Towards Humanizing Disabled People in Design. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 11, 1, Article 6 (March 2018), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178855
[70]
Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 705--714.
[71]
Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self-Confdent? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 2, Article 5 (Jan. 2016), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857
[72]
Robert M Siegfried. 2006. Visual Programming and the Blind: The Challenge and the Opportunity. Science Education (2006), 275--278. http://www.adelphi.edu/{ }siegfrir/molly
[73]
Darja ?mite, Nils Brede Moe, and Richard Torkar. 2008. Pitfalls in remote team coordination: Lessons learned from a case study. In International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement. Springer, 345--359.
[74]
Susan Leigh Star and Anselm Strauss. 1999. Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. (1999). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1008651105359.pdf
[75]
Andreas Stefk, Andrew Haywood, Shahzada Mansoor, Brock Dunda, and Daniel Garcia. 2009. Sodbeans. In 2009 IEEE 17th International Conference on Program Comprehension. IEEE, 293--294.
[76]
Anja Thieme, Cynthia L. Bennett, Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, and Alex S. Taylor. 2018. "I can do everything but see!" -- How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate their Abilities in Social Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173777
[77]
Anja Thieme, Cecily Morrison, Nicolas Villar, Martin Grayson, and Siân Lindley. 2017. Enabling collaboration in learning computer programing inclusive of children with vision impairments. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 739--752.
[78]
Alexia Tsotsis. 2011. Meet Phabricator, The Witty Code Review Tool Built Inside Facebook. https://techcrunch.com/ 2011/08/07/oh-what-noble-scribe-hath-penned-these-words/
[79]
Janine van der Rijt, Piet Van den Bossche, Margje WJ van de Wiel, Sven De Maeyer, Wim H Gijselaers, and Mien SR Segers. 2013. Asking for help: A relational perspective on help seeking in the workplace. Vocations and learning 6, 2 (2013), 259--279.
[80]
Bogdan Vasilescu, Andrea Capiluppi, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2014. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study. Interacting with Computers 26, 5 (2014), 488--511.
[81]
Herman Wahidin, Jenny Waycott, and Steven Baker. 2018. The Challenges in Adopting Assistive Technologies in the Workplace for People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Melbourne, Australia) (OzCHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 432--442. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292175
[82]
April Yi Wang, Anant Mittal, Christopher Brooks, and Steve Oney. 2019. How Data Scientists Use Computational Notebooks for Real-Time Collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--30.
[83]
Emily Q. Wang and Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Accessibility in Action: Co-Located Collaboration among Deaf and Hearing Professionals. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article Article 180 (Nov. 2018), 25 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3274449
[84]
Michele A Williams, Caroline Galbraith, Shaun K Kane, and Amy Hurst. 2014. "Just let the cane hit it" how the blind and sighted see navigation diferently. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility. 217--224.
[85]
Judith D Wilson, Nathan Hoskin, and John T Nosek. 1993. The benefts of collaboration for student programmers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 25, 1 (1993), 160--164.
[86]
Jacob O Wobbrock, Shaun K Kane, Krzysztof Z Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 3, 3 (2011), 1--27.
[87]
Chien Wen Yuan, Benjamin V Hanrahan, Sooyeon Lee, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2017. I Didn't Know That You Knew I Knew: Collaborative Shopping Practices Between People with Visual Impairment and People with Vision. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--18.
[88]
Yuhang Zhao, Shaomei Wu, Lindsay Reynolds, and Shiri Azenkot. 2017. The efect of computer-generated descriptions on photo-sharing experiences of people with visual impairments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--22.
[89]
Annuska Zolyomi, Anushree Shukla, and Jaime Snyder. 2017. Technology-Mediated Sight: A Case Study of Early Adopters of a Low Vision Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 220--229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132552

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Effective Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Software Development TeamsProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3674805.3690749(447-453)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Help and The Social Construction of Access: A Case-Study from IndiaProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675606(1-12)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)DesignChecker: Visual Design Support for Blind and Low Vision Web DevelopersProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676369(1-19)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Accessibility and Collaboration in Programming for People with Visual Impairments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2021
      5016 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3460939
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 April 2021
      Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. accessibility
      2. collaborative accessibility
      3. collaborative programming
      4. collaborative software development
      5. help-seeking
      6. programming
      7. social accessibility

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Google

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)164
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Effective Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Software Development TeamsProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3674805.3690749(447-453)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Help and The Social Construction of Access: A Case-Study from IndiaProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675606(1-12)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)DesignChecker: Visual Design Support for Blind and Low Vision Web DevelopersProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676369(1-19)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
      • (2024)"That comes with a huge career cost:" Understanding Collaborative Ideation Experiences of Disabled ProfessionalsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410188:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Neurodiversity and the Accessible University: Exploring Organizational Barriers, Access Labor and Opportunities for ChangeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410118:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Sharing is Caring: A Practical Guide to FAIR(ER) Open Data ReleaseProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671468(6513-6522)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Towards Inclusive Source Code Readability Based on the Preferences of Programmers with Visual ImpairmentsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642512(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)"Do You Want Me to Participate or Not?": Investigating the Accessibility of Software Development Meetings for Blind and Low Vision ProfessionalsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642130(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)A Systematic Review of Ability-diverse Collaboration through Ability-based Lens in HCIProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641930(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)UI Development Experiences of Programmers with Visual Impairments in Product TeamsEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_8(121-133)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media