research-article

Public Access

Designing for Independence for People with Visual Impairments

Authors:

Madison Reddie,

John M. CarrollAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 149, Pages 1 - 19

https://doi.org/10.1145/3449223

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The notion of "independence'' is frequently used to motivate technology design in the HCI sub-field of accessible and assistive technology for people with disabilities. Despite the term's pervasive use, the literature lacks a recent articulation of its meaning in the context of assistive technology. What does independence really mean? Scoping the study to people with visual impairments (PVI), we posed this question to 10 individuals from diverse backgrounds through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Our findings reveal that PVI have internal experiences of independence and social experiences of independence, with surprising insights into the roles that people and technology play in supporting independence. We also discuss new ways to design for independence.

References

[1]

[n.d.]. Aira. https://aira.io/.

[2]

[n.d.]. BeMyEyes. https://www.bemyeyes.com/.

[3]

[n.d.]. HumanWare's popular Trekker Breeze navigation system. https://store.humanware.com/hau/trekker-breezeplus-handheld-talking-gps.html.

[4]

Dragan Ahmetovic, Cole Gleason, Chengxiong Ruan, Kris Kitani, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2016. NavCog: a navigational cognitive assistant for the blind. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 90--99.

Digital Library

[5]

Shiri Azenkot, Sanjana Prasain, Alan Borning, Emily Fortuna, Richard E. Ladner, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. Enhancing independence and safety for blind and deaf-blind public transit riders. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3247--3256.

[6]

Adrian P. Banks and Lynne J. Millward. 2007. Differentiating Knowledge in Teams: The Effect of Shared Declarative and Procedural Knowledge on Team Performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 11, 2 (2007), 95--106.

[7]

Nikola Banovic, Rachel L. Franz, Khai N. Truong, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind K. Dey. 2013. Uncovering information needs for independent spatial learning for users who are visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 24.

[8]

Cynthia Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing (2018).

[9]

Jeffrey P. Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew Miller, Robert C. Miller, Robin Miller, Aubrey Tatarowicz, Brandyn White, Samuel White, et al. 2010. VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 333--342.

[10]

Pamela Block, Elizabeth A. Vanner, Christopher B. Keys, James H. Rimmer, and Sarah Everhart Skeels. 2010. Project Shake-It-Up: Using health promotion, capacity building and a disability studies framework to increase self efficacy. Disability and Rehabilitation 32, 9 (2010), 741--754.

[11]

Erin Brady, Meredith Ringel Morris, Yu Zhong, Samuel White, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Visual challenges in the everyday lives of blind people. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2117--2126.

[12]

Erin L. Brady, Daisuke Sato, Chengxiong Ruan, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2015. Exploring interface design for independent navigation by people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. ACM, 387--388.

Digital Library

[13]

Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Collaborative accessibility: How blind and sighted companions co-create accessible home spaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2373--2382.

[14]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.

[15]

Robin Brewer. 2018. Facilitating discussion and shared meaning: Rethinking co-design sessions with people with vision impairments. In PervasiveHealth '18: Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, 258--262.

Digital Library

[16]

Robin N Brewer and Vaishnav Kameswaran. 2018. Understanding the power of control in autonomous vehicles for people with vision impairment. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 185--197.

Digital Library

[17]

Stephen Brewster and Lorna M. Brown. 2004. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Australasian User Interface-Volume 28. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 15--23.

Digital Library

[18]

Stephen A. Brewster, Peter C. Wright, and Alistair D. N. Edwards. 1993. An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 222--227.

[19]

Simon Brisenden. 1986. Independent living and the medical model of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society 1, 2 (1986), 173--178.

[20]

Simon Brisenden. 1989. A charter for personal care. Progress 16 (1989), 6--8.

[21]

Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In DIS '00: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 424--433.

[22]

Alison Burrows, Val Mitchell, and CA Nicolle. 2011. All together now: factors that foster older adults' feelings of independence. (2011).

[23]

Rafael A. Calvo, Dorian Peters, Daniel Johnson, and Yvonne Rogers. 2014. Autonomy in technology design. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 37--40.

Digital Library

[24]

Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

[25]

Bart J. Collopy. 1995. Power, paternalism and the ambiguities of autonomy. Enhancing Autonomy in Long Term Care (1995), 3--14.

[26]

Clare Cullen and Oussama Metatla. 2018. Multisensory storytelling: A co-design study with children with mixed visual abilities. In IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 557--562.

Digital Library

[27]

Guy Dixon, Everard W. Thornton, and Carolyn A. Young. 2007. Perceptions of self-efficacy and rehabilitation among neurologically disabled adults. Clinical Rehabilitation 21 (2007), 230--240.

[28]

Hua Dong and Bella Vivat. 2008. Co-design Involving People with Disabilities. In DS 46: Proceedings of EPDE 2008, the 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. The Design Society, 162--167.

[29]

Peter Dorrington, Christopher Wilkinson, Lorna Tasker, and Andrew Walters. 2016. User-Centered Design Method for the Design of Assistive Switch Devices to Improve User Experience, Accessibility, and Independence. Journal of Usability Studies 11, 2 (2016), 66--82.

Digital Library

[30]

Graeme Douglas and Rachel Hewett. 2014. Views of independence and readiness for employment amongst young people with visual impairment in the UK. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling 20, 2 (2014), 81--99.

[31]

Heather A. Faucett, Kate E. Ringland, Amanda L. L. Cullen, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2017. (In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 10, 4 (2017).

Digital Library

[32]

Michael Fine and Caroline Glendinning. 2005. Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of ?care'and ?dependency'. Ageing & Society 25, 4 (2005), 601--621.

[33]

Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Alina Huldtgren, Lone Malmborg, Dave Harley, and Wijnand Ijsselsteijn. 2015. Design for agency, adaptivity and reciprocity: reimagining AAL and telecare agendas. In Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-world. Springer, 305--338.

[34]

Christopher Frauenberger, Julia Makhaeva, and Katta Spiel. 2017. Blending Methods: Developing Participatory Design Sessions for Autistic Children. In IDC '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 39--49.

[35]

Euan Freeman, Graham Wilson, Stephen Brewster, Gabriel Baud-Bovy, Charlotte Magnusson, and Hector Caltenco. 2017. Audible Beacons and Wearables in Schools: Helping Young Visually Impaired Children Play and Move Independently. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4146--4157.

Digital Library

[36]

Yael Frost, Harold Weingarden, Gabi Zeilig, Ayala Nota, and Debbie Rand. 2015. Self-Care Self-Efficacy Correlates with Independence in Basic Activities of Daily Living in Individuals with Chronic Stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 24, 7 (2015), 1649--1655.

[37]

Barbara E. Gibson, Franco A. Carnevale, and Gillian King. 2012. "This is my way": reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation 34, 22 (2012), 1894--1899.

[38]

James J. Gibson. 2014. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press.

[39]

Monique A. M. Gignac and Cheryl Cott. 1998. A conceptual model of independence and dependence for adults with chronic physical illness and disability. Social Science & Medicine 47, 6 (1998), 739--753.

[40]

Monique A. M. Gignac, Cheryl Cott, and Elizabeth M. Badley. 2000. Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 55, 6 (2000), P362--P372.

[41]

Deborah Gold, Alexander Shaw, and KarenWolffe. 2010. The Social Lives of Canadian Youths with Visual Impairments. Urban Studies 104, 7 (2010), 431--443.

[42]

Melva J. Gooden-Ledbetter, Michele T. Cole, Jill K. Maher, and Al Condeluci. 2007. Self-efficacy and interdependence as predictors of life satisfaction for people with disabilities: Implications for independent living programs. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 27, 3 (2007), 153--161.

[43]

Florian Güldenpfennig, Peter Mayer, Paul Panek, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. An Autonomy-Perspective on the Design of Assistive Technology Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.

Digital Library

[44]

Jonggi Hong, Lee Stearns, Jon Froehlich, David Ross, and Leah Findlater. 2016. Evaluating Angular Accuracy of Wrist-based Haptic Directional Guidance for Hand Movement. In Proceedings of the 42nd Graphics Interface Conference. 195--200.

Digital Library

[45]

Vaishnav Kameswaran, Jatin Gupta, Joyojeet Pal, Sile O'Modhrain, Tiffany C. Veinot, Robin Brewer, Aakanksha Parameshwar, and Jacki O'Neill. 2018. "We can go anywhere' Understanding Independence through a Case Study of Ride-hailing Use by People with Visual Impairments in metropolitan India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--24.

[46]

Shaun K Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O Wobbrock, and Richard E Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 115--122.

Digital Library

[47]

Anja Kintsch and Rogerio Depaula. 2001. A framework for the adoption of assistive technology. (2001).

[48]

Sooyeon Lee, Madison Reddie, Chun-Hua Tsai, Jordan Beck, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2020. The Emerging Professional Practice of Remote Sighted Assistance for People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.

[49]

Sooyeon Lee, Chien Wen Yuan, Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2017. Reaching Out: Investigating Different Modalities to Help People with Visual Impairments Acquire Items. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 389--390.

[50]

Janet Leece and Sheila Peace. 2009. Developing new understandings of independence and autonomy in the personalised relationship. British Journal of Social Work 40, 6 (2009), 1847--1865.

[51]

Janet Leece and Sheila Peace. 2010. Developing new understandings of independence and autonomy in the personalised relationship. British Journal of Social Work 40, 6 (2010), 1847--1865.

[52]

Heidi Lourens and Leslie Swartz. 2016. "It's better if someone can see me for who I am': stories of (in)visibility for students with a visual impairment within South African Universities. Disability Society 31, 2 (2016), 210--222.

[53]

Charlotte Magnusson, Per-Olof Hedvall, and Hector A. Caltenco. 2017. Co-designing together with Persons with Visual Impairments. Springer, Cham, 411--434.

[54]

Marilyn McGee-Lennon, Aidan Smeaton, and Stephen Brewster. 2012. Designing Home Care Reminder Systems: Lessons Learned Through Co-Design with Older Users. In 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops. IEEE, 49--56.

[55]

Oussama Metatla, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Fiore Martin. 2015. Designing with and for people living with visual impairments: audio-tactile mock-ups, audio diaries and participatory prototyping. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 11, 1 (2015), 35--48.

[56]

John Nicholson and Vladimir Kulyukin. 2007. ShopTalk: Independent blind shopping = verbal route directions+ barcode scans. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA 2007).

[57]

Judith Payling, Angela Zein, and Peter Zein. 2003. Disability unplugged. In Inclusive Design. Springer, 70--87.

[58]

Michael Polanyi. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press.

[59]

Halley Profita, Reem Albaghli, Leah Findlater, Paul Jaeger, and Shaun K Kane. 2016. The AT effect: how disability affects the perceived social acceptability of head-mounted display use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4884--4895.

Digital Library

[60]

Halley P Profita, Abigale Stangl, Laura Matuszewska, Sigrunn Sky, and Shaun K Kane. 2016. Nothing to hide: aesthetic customization of hearing aids and cochlear implants in an online community. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 219--227.

Digital Library

[61]

Parvaneh Rabiee. 2012. Exploring the relationships between choice and independence: experiences of disabled and older people. British Journal of Social Work 43, 5 (2012), 872--888.

[62]

Parvaneh Rabiee. 2013. Exploring the relationships between choice and independence: experiences of disabled and older people. British Journal of Social Work 43, 5 (2013), 872--888.

[63]

Solveig Magnus Reindal. 1999. Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability & Society 14, 3 (1999), 353--367.

[64]

Gale Robinson-Smith, Mark V. Johnston, and Judith Allen. 2000. Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life, and depression after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81, 4 (2000), 460--464.

[65]

Patricia J Rock. 1988. Independence: what it means to six disabled people living in the community. Disability, Handicap & Society 3, 1 (1988), 27--35.

[66]

Nuzhah Gooda Sahib, Tony Stockman, Anastasios Tombros, and Oussama Metatla. 2013. Participatory Design with Blind Users: A Scenario-Based Approach. In INTERACT 2013: Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2013, Vol. 8117. IFIP, 685--701.

[67]

Michael Schillmeier. 2008. Time-Spaces of In/dependence and Dis/ability. Time & Society 17, 2--3 (2008), 215--231.

[68]

Jenny Secker, Robert Hill, Louise Villeneau, and SUE Parkman. 2003. Promoting independence: but promoting what and how? Ageing & Society 23, 3 (2003), 375--391.

[69]

Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 705--714.

[70]

Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2016. Self-conscious or self-confident? A diary study conceptualizing the social accessibility of assistive technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 8, 2 (2016), 1--31.

Digital Library

[71]

Aderonke Kofo Soetan, Amos Ochayi Onojah, Tawakalit Bukola Alaka, and Adenike Janet Aderogba. 2020. Hearing Impaired Students' Self-Efficacy on the Utilization of Assistive Technology in Federal College of Education (Special) Oyo. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE) 1, 1 (2020), 4245--4252.

[72]

Akiko Tamaru, Mary Ann McColl, and Setsuko Yamasaki. 2007. Understanding ?independence': perspectives of occupational therapists. Disability and Rehabilitation 29, 13 (2007), 1021--1033.

[73]

Lois M. Verbrugge, Kalyani K. Mehta, and Ellen Wagenfeld-Heintz. 2006. Views of disability in the United States and Singapore. Research on Aging 28, 2 (2006), 216--239.

[74]

Lois M. Verbrugge and Purvi Sevak. 2002. Use, type, and efficacy of assistance for disability. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 57, 6 (2002), S366--S379.

[75]

GlenWWhite, Jamie Lloyd Simpson, Chiaki Gonda, Craig Ravesloot, and Zach Coble. 2010. Moving from independence to interdependence: A conceptual model for better understanding community participation of centers for independent living consumers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 20, 4 (2010), 233--240.

[76]

Graham Wilson and Stephen A. Brewster. 2016. Using Dynamic Audio Feedback to Support Peripersonal Reaching in Young Visually Impaired People. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 209--218.

[77]

Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 3, 3 (2011), 9.

Digital Library

[78]

Nancy Worth. 2013. Visual Impairment in the City: Young People's Social Strategies for Independent Mobility. Urban Studies 50, 3 (2013), 574--586.

Cited By

Bandukda MAzmi AXiao LHolloway C(2024)Experience-Sharing to Support Inclusive Travel for Blind and Partially Sighted PeopleSustainability10.3390/su1620882716:20(8827)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208827
Barbareschi GRyoichi AKawaguchi MTakeda MMinamizawa K(2024)SeaHare: An omidirectional electric wheelchair integrating independent, remote and shared control modalitiesProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675657(1-16)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663548.3675657
Lee JLee BChoi SSeo JChoe E(2024)Identify, Adapt, PersistProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36595858:2(1-21)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659585
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Designing for Independence for People with Visual Impairments
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Accessibility
    1. Empirical studies in accessibility

Recommendations

Designing motion marking menus for people with visual impairments

We explored the potential of marking menus as a solution to current problems of people with visual impairments in using mobile devices.We proposed motion-based marking menus (MMM) for eyes-free interactions in smartphones for people with visual ...
Non-Visual Cooking: Exploring Practices and Challenges of Meal Preparation by People with Visual Impairments
ASSETS '21: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

The reliance on vision for tasks related to cooking and eating healthy can present barriers to cooking for oneself and achieving proper nutrition. There has been little research exploring cooking practices and challenges faced by people with visual ...
“It Feels Like Taking a Gamble”: Exploring Perceptions, Practices, and Challenges of Using Makeup and Cosmetics for People with Visual Impairments
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Makeup and cosmetics offer the potential for self-expression and the reshaping of social roles for visually impaired people. However, there exist barriers to conducting a beauty regime because of the reliance on visual information and color variances in ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

April 2021

5016 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3460939

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2021

Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

NSF (National Science Foundation)

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

19
Total Citations
View Citations
1,224
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)442
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)76

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bandukda MAzmi AXiao LHolloway C(2024)Experience-Sharing to Support Inclusive Travel for Blind and Partially Sighted PeopleSustainability10.3390/su1620882716:20(8827)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208827
Barbareschi GRyoichi AKawaguchi MTakeda MMinamizawa K(2024)SeaHare: An omidirectional electric wheelchair integrating independent, remote and shared control modalitiesProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675657(1-16)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663548.3675657
Lee JLee BChoi SSeo JChoe E(2024)Identify, Adapt, PersistProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36595858:2(1-21)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3659585
Lyu YCarroll J(2024)"Because Some Sighted People, They Don't Know What the Heck You're Talking About:" A Study of Blind Tokers' Infrastructuring Work to Build IndependenceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372978:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637297
Li XZhou XDong RZhang YWang X(2024)Efficient Bottom-Up Synthesis for Programs with Local VariablesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36328948:POPL(1540-1568)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632894
Figueiredo MAnkrah EPowell JEpstein DChen Y(2024)Powered by AIProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314147:4(1-24)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3631414
Barbareschi GKumar TKim CChernyshov GKunze K(2024)"Speech is Silver, Silence is Golden " Analyzing Micro-communication Strategies between Visually Impaired Runners and their GuidesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642388(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642388
Lee MKim SIn H(2024)Archi-TangiBlock: A Modular Block Based Tangible Media as a CAD Tool for Visually Impaired PeopleIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.338231112(46582-46595)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3382311
Murnane EGlazko YCosta JYao RZhao GMoya PLanday J(2023)Narrative-Based Visual Feedback to Encourage Sustained Physical ActivityProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35807867:1(1-36)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3580786
Jain GTeng YCho DXing YAziz MSmith B(2023)"I Want to Figure Things Out": Supporting Exploration in Navigation for People with Visual ImpairmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794967:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579496
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents