research-article

Teacher's acceptance of online education platform into foreign language teaching in Chinese higher education

Authors:

Sheng-Hsiung ChiuAuthors Info & Claims

IC4E '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning

Pages 260 - 263

https://doi.org/10.1145/3450148.3450169

Published: 13 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

China's increasingly frequent multilateral economic trade activities require continuous cultivate high-quality foreign language talents. With the outbreak of the COVID-19, foreign language teaching in universities is confronted with the rapid transition of teaching mode, and teacher's using status of online teaching platforms is urgently demanded to be understood. The purpose of this research is to explore the variable factors that influence teachers’ intention to use online teaching platforms. This research uses the Technology Acceptance Model which has a relatively complete explanatory ability as the theoretical basis, extracts two core independent variables and introduces experience as interference factors to construct the framework of this research. Taking Guangxi universities as an example, a questionnaire survey was distributed to 35 universities, with 263 foreign language teachers participated anonymously. The results of data analysis can help education researchers comprehend the current foreign language teachers’ using status of online teaching platforms, at the same time provide a knowledge-based understanding of how to optimize and cultivate teachers informationization teaching capabilities to governments and universities.

References

[1]

Ministry of education. 2020. The thirteenth five-year plan of education informational. Retrieved Jun 07, 2016 from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201606/t20160622_269367.html

[2]

Zhuhua W. 2012. E-moderating is the Key to Teaching and Learning Online: An interview with Dr. Gilly Salmon. Open Education Research. 18, 6 (December 2012), 4-8.

[3]

Gacs A, Goertler S, and Spasova S. 2020. Planned online language education versus crisis‐prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals. 53 (May 2020).

[4]

Rice M. F, and Deschaine M. E. 2020. Orienting Toward Teacher Education for Online Environments for All Students. The Educational Forum. 84, 2 (January 2020), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1702747

[5]

Dulcic Z, Pavlic D, and Silic I. 2012. Evaluating the intended use of Decision Support System (DSS) by applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in business organizations in Croatia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 58 (December 2012), 1565-1575.

[6]

Hong S, Thong J Y, and Tam K Y. 2006. Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision support systems. 42, 3 (December 2006), 1819-1834.

[7]

Ward R. 2013. The application of technology acceptance and diffusion of innovation models in healthcare informatics. Health Policy and Technology. 2, 4 (December 2013), 222-228.

[8]

Adov L, Pedaste M, Leijen Ä, and Rannikmäe M. 2020. Does it have to be easy, useful, or do we need something else? STEM teachers’ attitudes towards mobile device use in teaching. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 29, 4 (July 2020), 511-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1785928

[9]

Scherer R, Siddiq F, and Tondeur J. 2019. The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers and Education. 128 (September 2019), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

[10]

Holden H, and Rada R. 2014. Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 43, 4 (February 2014), 343-367.

[11]

Yuen A H, and Ma W W. 2008. Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 36, 3 (July 2008), 229-243.

[12]

Hong J Y, Suh E H, and Kim S J. 2009. Context-aware systems: A literature review and classification. Expert Systems with applications. 36, 4 (May 2009), 8509-8522.

[13]

Wu B, and Chen X. 2016. Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior. 67 (September 2016), 221-232.

[14]

Peng B. 2012. An overview of the researches on technology acceptance model. Research on Library Science. (January 2012).

[15]

Nunnally J C. 1994. Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education.

[16]

Williams B, Onsman A, and Brown T. 2010. Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian journal of paramedicine. 8, 3 (August 2010).

[17]

Taylor S, and Todd P. 1995. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS quarterly. 19, 4 (December 1995), 561-570.

[18]

Davis F D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. (September 1995), 319-340.

[19]

Teo T, and Zhou M. 2017. The influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments. 25, 4 (February 2016), 513-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844

Cited By

Tsai YChen MFang C(2024)The Study on the Acceptance and Learning Effectiveness of Using E-Learning for Students in Fine Art and Design CollegesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.337914512(42055-42067)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3379145
Zhu Y(2023)Design of Computer Platform of Chinese Education for Online Education2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management (SSIM)10.1109/SSIM59263.2023.10469428(109-113)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SSIM59263.2023.10469428
Rosli MSaleh NMd. Ali AAbu Bakar SMohd Tahir L(2022)A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model for the Sustainability of Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Identified Research GapsSustainability10.3390/su14181138914:18(11389)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389

Index Terms

Teacher's acceptance of online education platform into foreign language teaching in Chinese higher education

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Determinants of Foreign Language Teachers’ Intention to Adopt Online Teaching: An empirical study by the combined model of TAM and TTF
ICDTE '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education

The purpose of this study is to explore the factors that influence foreign language teachers’ intention to use (IU) the online platform by integrating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task Technology Fit (TTF). A sample of 358 foreign language ...
A program design for computer education for teacher education colleges
Culturally Relevant Teaching and Multicultural Education Across STEM Courses for Teacher Education and High School

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

IC4E '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning

January 2021

410 pages

ISBN:9781450388542

DOI:10.1145/3450148

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

IC4E 2021

IC4E 2021: 2021 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning

January 10 - 13, 2021

Tokyo, Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
60
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)9
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Tsai YChen MFang C(2024)The Study on the Acceptance and Learning Effectiveness of Using E-Learning for Students in Fine Art and Design CollegesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.337914512(42055-42067)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3379145
Zhu Y(2023)Design of Computer Platform of Chinese Education for Online Education2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management (SSIM)10.1109/SSIM59263.2023.10469428(109-113)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SSIM59263.2023.10469428
Rosli MSaleh NMd. Ali AAbu Bakar SMohd Tahir L(2022)A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model for the Sustainability of Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Identified Research GapsSustainability10.3390/su14181138914:18(11389)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten