skip to main content
10.1145/3450337.3483454acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Escape the Fake: Development and Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Escape Room Game for Fighting Fake News

Published:15 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today's digital natives easily master new devices, but there is a greater need to provide them with a strong foundation of attitudes, skills and values to interpret the world around them. Moreover, in the context of remote schooling, providing students with opportunities to learn outside of the classroom and in an interactive manner is equally important. In this article, we address these issues by providing an account of Escape Fake, an augmented reality (AR) escape room game for educating young people about fake news. We show how such a game can be designed for playing at home, thereby providing interactive learning opportunities remotely. We discuss how to teach information literacy, by introducing the design process and gameplay of Escape Fake. In our evaluation with teenagers and young adults (n=49), we investigated the flow experience, attitude towards learning effectiveness and interest in learning with an AR escape game. Escape Fake was very well accepted by youth, who are willing to play the game in their free time. These results provide considerations for educators, researchers and designers who develop educational content by means of AR escape rooms.

References

  1. Azita Iliya Abdul Jabbar and Patrick Felicia. 2015. Gameplay Engagement and Learning in Game-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research 85, 4: 740–779. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315577210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, and B. MacIntyre. 2001. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21, 6: 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Carlos Borrego, Cristina Fernández, Ian Blanes, and Sergi Robles. 2017. Room escape at class: Escape games activities to facilitate the motivation and learning in computer science. Journal of Technology and Science Education 7, 2: 162. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Denise M. Bressler, Alec M. Bodzin, and Michael Shane Tutwiler. 2019. Engaging middle school students in scientific practice with a collaborative mobile game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35, 2: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12321Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Alina Campan, Alfredo Cuzzocrea, and Traian Marius Truta. 2017. Fighting fake news spread in online social networks: Actual trends and future research directions. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 4453–4457. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dongho Choi, JiHo An, Chirag Shah, and Vivek Singh. 2017. Examining information search behaviors in small physical space: An escape room study: Examining Information Search Behaviors in Small Physical Space: An Escape Room Study. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54, 1: 640–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia. 2018. Fighting fake news: a role for computational social science in the fight against digital misinformation. Journal of Computational Social Science 1, 1: 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-017-0005-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2009. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper [and] Row, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brian Detlor, Lorne Booker, Alexander Serenko, and Heidi Julien. 2012. Student perceptions of information literacy instruction: The importance of active learning. Education for Information 29, 2: 147–161. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2012-0924Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yoram Eshet-Alkalai. 2012. Thinking in the Digital Era: A Revised Model for Digital Literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 9: 267–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Panagiotis Fotaris and Theodoros Mastoras. 2019. Escape Rooms for Learning: A Systematic Review. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Game Based Learning, 30. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.19.179Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Julian Fraillon, John Ainley, Wolfram Schulz, Daniel Duckworth, and Tim Friedman. 2019. IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 Assessment Framework. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19389-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lindsay Grace and Bob Hone. 2019. Factitious: Large Scale Computer Game to Fight Fake News and Improve News Literacy. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, Ravit Golan Duncan, and Clark A. Chinn. 2007. Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42, 2: 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Huei-Tse Hou and Ming-Chaun Li. 2014. Evaluating multiple aspects of a digital educational problem-solving-based adventure game. Computers in Human Behavior 30: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y.H. Hsieh, Y.C. Lin, and H.T. Hou. 2013. Exploring the role of flow experience, learning performance and potential behavior clusters in elementary students’ game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments: 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Susan A. Jackson, Andrew J. Martin, and Robert C. Eklund. 2008. Long and Short Measures of Flow: The Construct Validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and New Brief Counterparts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 30, 5: 561–587. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.5.561Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Michael Kerres and Claudia De Witt. 2003. A Didactical Framework for the Design of Blended Learning Arrangements. Journal of Educational Media 28, 2–3: 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165032000165653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kristian Kiili and Timo Lainema. 2008. Foundation for measuring engagement in educational games. Interactive Learning Research 19, 3: 469–488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Anna Eva Kinio, Laurence Dufresne, Tim Brandys, and Prasad Jetty. 2019. Break out of the Classroom: The Use of Escape Rooms as an Alternative Teaching Strategy in Surgical Education. Journal of Surgical Education 76, 1: 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. John Kirriemuir and Angela Mcfarlane. 2004. Literature Review in Games and Learning. Retrieved from https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190453/documentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Paul A. Kirschner and Slavi Stoyanov. 2020. Educating Youth for Nonexistent/Not Yet Existing Professions. Educational Policy 34, 3: 477–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818802086Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Boriana Koleva, Matt Adams, Ian Taylor, Steve Benford, Mike Fraser, Chris Greenhalgh, Holger Schnädelbach, Dirk vom Lehn, Christian Heath, and Ju Row-Farr. 2001. Orchestrating a mixed reality performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’01, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. David R. Krathwohl. 2002. A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice 41, 4: 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sonsoles Lopez-Pernas, Aldo Gordillo, Enrique Barra, and Juan Quemada. 2019. Examining the Use of an Educational Escape Room for Teaching Programming in a Higher Education Setting. IEEE Access 7: 31723–31737. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902976Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Leah Mann. 2018. Making a Place for Makerspaces in Information Literacy. Information Literacy and Instruction, 58, 2: 82–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee C. McIntyre. 2018. Post-truth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. David Merrill. Using the First Principles of Instruction to Make Instruction Effective, Efficient, and Engaging. In Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology: The Past, Present, and Future of Learning and Instructional Design Technology. Retrieved April 17, 2020 from https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/using_the_first_principles_of_instructionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Scott Nicholson. 2018. Creating Engaging Escape Rooms for the Classroom. Childhood Education 94, 1: 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2018.1420363Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jan L. Plass and Ulas Kaplan. 2016. Emotional Design in Digital Media for Learning. In Emotions, Technology, Design, and Learning. Elsevier, 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801856-9.00007-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Christina Pollalis, Catherine Grevet, Lauren Westendorf, Samantha Finn, Orit Shaer, and Panagiotis Metaxas. 2018. Classroom Activity for Critical Analysis of News Propagation Online. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3174355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Raymond Pun. 2017. Hacking the Research Library: Wikipedia, Trump, and Information Literacy in the Escape Room at Fresno State. The Library Quarterly 87, 4: 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/693489Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Katie Salen Tekinbaş and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Alice Veldkamp, Joke Daemen, Stijn Teekens, Stefan Koelewijn, Marie‐Christine P. J. Knippels, and Wouter R. Joolingen. 2020. Escape boxes: Bringing escape room experience into the classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology 51, 4: 1220–1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12935Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Brian Winn. 2008. The Design, Play, and Experience Framework. In Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. Kent State University, Kent.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rachel M. Wong and Olusola O. Adesope. 2021. Meta-Analysis of Emotional Designs in Multimedia Learning: A Replication and Extension Study. Educational Psychology Review 33, 2: 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09545-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Gavin Wood, Kiel Long, Tom Feltwell, Scarlett Rowland, Phillip Brooker, Jamie Mahoney, John Vines, Julie Barnett, and Shaun Lawson. 2018. Rethinking Engagement with Online News through Social and Visual Co-Annotation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Escape the Fake: Development and Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Escape Room Game for Fighting Fake News
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                CHI PLAY '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
                October 2021
                414 pages
                ISBN:9781450383561
                DOI:10.1145/3450337

                Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 15 October 2021

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • extended-abstract
                • Research
                • Refereed limited

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format