skip to main content
10.1145/3450337.3483470acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Enhancing Children Spatial Skills with Augmented Reality Serious Games

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Augmented reality (AR) applications have shown to be extremely valuable for entertainment and educational purposes. AR experiences support the learning performance of scientific subjects by providing visualization of phenomena and abstract concepts. This process facilitates the transfer of 2D information into 3D mental models, a cognitive process essential in the Chemistry domain. In the pages that follow, we contribute to the design and development of two AR serious games that combine participatory design with human-computer interaction principles to introduce Periodic Table concepts to 9-13-year old children. We present initial findings regarding the children’s acceptance and satisfaction of the games, usability, engagement and overall feedback from our target audience. Although the overall assessment showed positive results in AR’s entertainment value and usability, a preliminary pilot test (N=7) using a mix-method approach identified the need for minor game-play interventions. We aim to optimize our games by continuing our research with our target audience, analyzing their feedback, making refinements and assessing the game’s learning effectiveness. Our purpose is to research and create guidelines for designing AR serious games to facilitate the learning of abstract concepts while supporting spatial skills. We also aim to change student perception of Chemistry as challenging and dull, and to motivate children to invest in this area.

References

  1. Vanessa Cesário, Rui Trindade, Sandra Olim, and Valentina Nisi. 2019. Memories of carvalhal’s palace: Haunted encounters, a museum experience to engage teenagers. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 554–557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John Dewey. 1998. The essential Dewey: Pragmatism, education, democracy. Vol. 1. Indiana University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Matt Dunleavy. 2014. Design principles for augmented reality learning. TechTrends 58, 1 (2014), 28–34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ingo Eilks and Avi Hofstein. 2015. Relevant chemistry education: From theory to practice. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Melanie C. Green, Kaitlin Fitzgerald, and Melissa M. Moore. 2019. Archetypes and Narrative Processes. Psychological Inquiry 30, 2 (2019), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1614808 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1614808Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. RB Guay. 1977. The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test Purdue Research Foundation. West Lafayette, IN (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jorge Martín Gutiérrez, Melchor García Domínguez, and Cristina Roca González. 2015. Using 3D virtual technologies to train spatia skills in engineering. The International journal of engineering education 31, 1 (2015), 323–334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferli Septi Irwansyah, YM Yusuf, Ida Farida, and Muhammad Ali Ramdhani. 2018. Augmented reality (AR) technology on the android operating system in chemistry learning. In IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering, Vol. 288. IOP Publishing, 012068.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jorge Martín-Gutiérrez, Peña Fabiani, Wanda Benesova, María Dolores Meneses, and Carlos E Mora. 2015. Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in human behavior 51 (2015), 752–761.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sandra K Metoyer, Sarah Witham Bednarz, and Robert S Bednarz. 2015. Spatial thinking in education: Concepts, development, and assessment. In Geospatial Technologies and Geography Education in a Changing World. Springer, 21–33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Carla Morais. 2015. Storytelling with chemistry and related hands-on activities: Informal learning experiences to prevent “chemophobia” and promote young children’s scientific literacy. Journal of Chemical Education 92, 1 (2015), 58–65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Emily Moyer-Gusé. 2008. Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory 18, 3 (2008), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Farooq Mughal and Aneesa Zafar. 2011. Experiential learning from a constructivist perspective: Reconceptualizing the Kolbian cycle. International Journal of Learning and Development 1, 2(2011), 27–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Nora S Newcombe. 2013. Seeing Relationships: Using Spatial Thinking to Teach Science, Mathematics, and Social Studies.American Educator 37, 1 (2013), 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonathan Osborne, Shirley Simon, and Sue Collins. 2003. Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International journal of science education 25, 9 (2003), 1049–1079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Janet C Read, Stuart MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2002. Endurability, engagement and expectations: Measuring children’s fun. In Interaction design and children, Vol. 2. Shaker Publishing Eindhoven, 1–23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghassan Sirhan. 2007. Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pornpon Thamrongrat and Effie Lai-Chong Law. 2019. Design and Evaluation of an Augmented Reality App for Learning Geometric Shapes in 3D. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 364–385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.Journal of personality and social psychology 54, 6(1988), 1063.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsin-Kai Wu and Priti Shah. 2004. Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science education 88, 3 (2004), 465–492.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing Children Spatial Skills with Augmented Reality Serious Games
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI PLAY '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
            October 2021
            414 pages
            ISBN:9781450383561
            DOI:10.1145/3450337

            Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 15 October 2021

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Work in Progress
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format