skip to main content
10.1145/3450341.3457990acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

The influence of clutter on search-based learning, long-term memory, and memory-guided attention in real-world scenes: an eye-movement research protocol

Published:25 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have shown that visual clutter degrades visual search performance. This performance decrement is also reflected in several eye movement metrics, such as mean fixation duration, scan path length, and first saccade latency. However, whether and if so, how visual clutter might impact other cognitive processes that are important for adaptive functioning, like learning, long-term memory, and attention, remains poorly understood. Here, we present the rationale for the use of a three-stage experimental paradigm combined with eye-tracking to better understand the effects of visual clutter observed in real-world scenes on cognition and eye movement behavior. We also present preliminary behavioral findings on this topic from our lab and discuss areas with significant potential for future research.

References

  1. Park Soojin, Talia Konkle, and Aude Oliva. 2015. Parametric coding of the size and clutter of natural scenes in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 25, 7 (2015), 1792-1805. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht418Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeremy M. Wolfe. 1994. Guided search 2.0 a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1, 2 (1994), 202-238. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200774Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ruth Rosenholtz, Yuanzhen Li, Jonathan Mansfield, and Zhenlan Jin. 2005. Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA, 761-770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ruth Rosenholtz, Yuanzhen Li, and Lisa Nakano. 2007. Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision 7, 2 (2007), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.17Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Michael L. Mack, and Aude Oliva. 2004. Computational estimation of visual complexity. In the 12th Annual Object, Perception, Attention, and Memory Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mary J. Bravo, and Hany Farid. 2008. A scale-invariant measure of clutter. Journal of Vision, 8,1 (2008), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.1.23Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mark B. Neider, and Gregory J. Zelinsky. 2011. Cutting through the clutter: Searching for targets in evolving complex scenes. Journal of Vision 11,14 (2011), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.14.7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. John M. Henderson, Myriam Chanceaux, and Tim J. Smith. 2009. The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: Evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9, 32 (2009), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.1.32Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Biyun Zhu, and Xianghong Sun. 2012. Effects of superposition on oculomotor guidance and target recognition. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA, 333-337. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1071181312561077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Melissa R. Beck, Maura C. Lohrenz, Gregory J. Trafton. 2010. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: Global and local clutter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 3, 238-250. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0019633Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Melissa R. Beck, Michael Trenchard, Amanda van Lamsweerde, Rebecca R. Goldstein, and Maura Lohrenz. 2012. Searching in clutter: Visual attention strategies of expert pilots. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, Sage Publications, Santa Monica, CA, 1411-1415. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1071181312561400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Nadine Moacdieh, and Nadine Sarter. 2015. Display clutter: A review of definitions and measurement techniques. Human Factors, 57, 1 (2015), 61-100. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0018720814541145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Grayden J.F. Solman, and Daniel Smilek. 2012. Memory benefits during visual search depend on difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 6 (2012), 689-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.682053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Joseph H. Goldberg, and Xerxes P. Kotval. 1999. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 24, 6 (1999), 631-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Maya L. Rosen, Andrew N. Meltzoff, Margaret A. Sheridan, and Katie A. McLaughlin. 2019. Distinct aspects of the early environment contribute to associative memory, cued attention, and memory-guided attention: Implications for academic achievement. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 40 (2019) 100731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100731Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. The influence of clutter on search-based learning, long-term memory, and memory-guided attention in real-world scenes: an eye-movement research protocol

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ETRA '21 Adjunct: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
      May 2021
      78 pages
      ISBN:9781450383578
      DOI:10.1145/3450341

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 May 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

      Upcoming Conference

      ETRA '24
      The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
      June 4 - 7, 2024
      Glasgow , United Kingdom
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format