skip to main content
10.1145/3450588.3450590acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Role of End Users in Efficient Business Intelligence Solutions: A Preliminary Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Business intelligence (BI) is a highly regarded tool used to enhance decision-making and business procedures. Numerous studies argue for its effectiveness. However, the role of end users in ensuring efficient and effective BI solutions has received little attention in the literature. This paper presents a study of interviews with four BI end users to identify their influence on the efficiency of BI solutions. The interviews depart from theories within human-computer interaction (HCI) and information architecture (IA) to reveal users’ perspectives on actively engaging with BI solutions in everyday work tasks. The qualitative interviews demonstrate that users recognize the potential of working with BI and that engaged users support the efficient use of BI solutions in professional organizations. The study concludes that more research should be conducted in this field to increase our understanding of users as critical factors in the efficient use of BI solutions in organizations.

References

  1. R. Sherman. 2014. Business Intelligence Guidebook: From Data Integration to Analytics. Elsevier Science & Technology. San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Fink, N. Yogev, and A. Even. 2017. Business intelligence and organizational learning: An empirical investigation of value creation processes, Information & Management 54, 1 (2017), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.03.009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Z. Ravasan and S. R. Savoji. 2014. An Investigation of BI Implementation Critical Success Factors in Iranian Context, IJBIR 5, 3 (jul. 2014) 41–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijbir.2014070104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Gaardboe and T. Svarre. 2018. Business Intelligence Success Factors: A Literature Review, Journal of Information Technology Management, 29, 1 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Grubljesic and J. Jaklic. 2015. Business Intelligence Acceptance: The Prominence of Organizational Factors, Inf. Syst. Manage., 32, 4, (2015), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2015.1080000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean. 2003. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (2003), 9–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Petter and E. R. McLean, 2009. A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level, Information & Management, 46, 3 (apr. 2009), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Rosenfeld, P. Morville, and J. Arango. 2015. Information architecture, For the Web and Beyond, 4th ed. O`Reilly Media, Inc. Sebastopol.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N. Ain, G. Vaia, W. H. DeLone, and M. Waheed. 2019. Two decades of research on business intelligence system adoption, utilization and success – A systematic literature review, Decision Support Systems, 125 (okt. 2019), 113113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Adamala and L. Cidrin. 2011. Key success factors in Business Intelligence, J. Intell. Stud. Bus., 1, 1 (2011), 107–127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Bischoff, S. Aier, M. K. Haki, and R. Winter. 2015. Understanding continuous use of business intelligence systems: A mixed methods investigation, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 16, 2 (2015), 5–37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Gaardboe. 2018. Kritiske succesfaktorer for Business Intelligence. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. Aalborg, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Gaardboe, N. Sandalgaard, and F. Sudzina. 2017. The importance of task compatibility for web-enabled business intelligence success in e-government. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services, New York, 353–357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Gaardboe and T. Svarre. 2018. BI End-User Segments in the Public Health Sector. In: Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 231–242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C.-K. Hou. 2012. Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: An empirical study of Taiwan's electronics industry, International Journal of Information Management, 32, 6 (dec. 2012), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.03.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Jooste, J. van Biljon, and J. Mentz. 2013. Usability evaluation guidelines for business intelligence applications. In: Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference, New York, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513456.2513478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Molensky, W. Ketter, J. Collins, J. Bloemhof, and H. van de Koppel. 2010. Business intelligence gap analysis: a user, supplier and academic perspective. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: Roadmap for the Future of Electronic Business, New York, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2389376.2389393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Tamm, P. Seddon, and G. Shanks. 2013. Pathways to Value from Business Analytics. In: ICIS 2013 Proceedings, 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T. Mudzana and M. Maharaj, 2015.Measuring the success of business-intelligence systems in South Africa: an empirical investigation applying the DeLone and McLean Model: original research, South African Journal of Information Management, 17, 1 (2015), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v17i1.646.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Inge. 1929. But What Is Success?, The North American Review, 228, 3 (1929), 281–285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Kaiser and S. D. Young. 2013. The Blue Line Imperative: What Managing for Value Really Means. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. K. Leidecker and A. V. Bruno. 1984. Identifying and using critical success factors, Long Range Planning, 17, 1 (feb. 1984), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(84)90163-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. G. J. Kim. 2015. Introduction, In: Human-Computer Interaction Fundamentals and Practice. Taylor Francis. Abingdon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Preece, Y. Rogers, and H. Sharp. 2015. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. P. J. Smith, R. Beatty, C. C. Hayes, A. Larson, N. Geddes D., and M. C. Dorneich. 2012. Human-Centered Design of Decision-Support Systems. In: Human Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, 3rd ed., J. A. Jacko, Ed. CRC Press, London, 589–615.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. W. C. Adams. 2015. Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In: Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 4th ed., K. E. Newcomer, J. S. Wholey, and H. P. Hatry, Ed. Wiley, Hoboken, 492–505.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. H. Bhattacharya. 2008. Research Setting. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, L. M. Given, Ed.Sage, New York, 788–789.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. J. Tracy. 2010. Qualitative Quality: Eight ‘Big-Tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research -, Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 10 (2010), 837–851.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. A. Bryman. 2015. Social Research Methods, 5th ed. Oxford University Press. Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. A. Bryman and E. Bell. 2011. Business Research Methods, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. N. Mackenzie and S. Knipe. 2006. Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology, Issues in educational research, 16, 2 (2006), 193–205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. D. H. Olsen and P.-D. Bryant. 2012. Business Intelligence And Information Systems: Enhancing Student Knowledge In Database Courses, RBIS, 16, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.19030/rbis.v16i1.6759.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCMB '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
    January 2021
    153 pages
    ISBN:9781450388610
    DOI:10.1145/3450588

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format