Engkos Achmad Kuncoro
ABSTRACT
As a hub in multimodal transport, there are multiple stakeholders take part in the successful of dry port. This research proposed that the commitment among these stakeholders in terms of cost is essential to the dry ports’ performance. In addition, this research examined that collaborative supply chain as mediation between stakeholders’ cost commitment and dry port firms’ performance. The results showed that the indirect effect is larger than direct effect, which support the partial mediation effect. Finally, this research discussed the implication and limitation of this research.
- Violeta Roso, Dawn Rusell, Dawna Rhoades. 2019. Diffusion of Innovation Assessment of Adoption of the Dry Port Concept. Transactions on Maritime Science, Vol. 3, 26–36.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jagan Jeevan, Shu-Ling Chen, Stephen Cahoon. 2018. Determining the Influential Factors of Dry Port Operations: Worldwide Experiences and Empirical Evidence from Malaysia. Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 20, 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0063-yGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- A. Beresford, S. Pettit, Q. Xu, and S. Williams. 2012. Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 14 (1), 73–98.Google Scholar
- Lam Canh Nguyen, Theo Nottebom. 2016. A Multi-Criteria Approach to Dry Port Location in Developing Economics with Application to Vietnam. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. Vol. 32 (1), 23–32. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.03.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hercules Haralambides, Girish Gujar. 2012. On Balancing Supply Chain Efficiency and Environmental Impacts: An Eco-DEA Model Applied to the Dry Port Sector of India. Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 14, 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2011.19Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shinya Hanaoka and Madan B. Regmi. 2011. Promoting Intermodal Freight Transport through the Development of Dry Port in Asia: An Environmental Perspective. IATTS Research, 35, 16–23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Femi Yulianti, Murni Dwi Astuti, Ayudita Oktafiani. 2019. Faktor-Faktor Sukses Pemilihan Lokasi Pembangunan Dry Port di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Terapan. Vol. 6 (1, December), 49–55.Google Scholar
- Bram DeSmet, B. 2018. Supply chain strategy and financial metrics: The supply chain triangle of service, cost and cash. Kogan Page Publishers.Google Scholar
- Qinhua Zhu and Joseph Sarkis. 2006. An Inter-Sectoral Comparison of Green Supply Chain Management in China: Drivers and Practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 24, 472–486.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Magali Delmas. 2001. Stakeholders and Competitive Advantage: The Case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management. Vol. 10 (3), 343–358.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Seuring and M. Muller. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol 16, 1699–1710.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edwin M. Agwu. 2019. Impact of Stakeholders’ Analysis on Organizational Performance: A Study of Nigerian Financial Organizations. International Journal of Strategic Decision Science. Vol. 10 (4, October-December), 64 – 80.Google Scholar
- Mary J. Meixell and Patrice Luoma. 2015. Stakeholder Pressure in Sustainable Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Vol. 45 (1/2), 69–89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Rebs, M. Brandenburg, S. Seuring, and M. Stohler. 2018. Stakeholder Influences and Risks in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies. Business Research, vol. 11, 197–237.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. B. E. Clarkson. 1995. A Stakeholder Framework of Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 92–117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. E. Freeman. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
- J. Frooman. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies, Academy of Management Journal, 24 (2), 191–205.Google Scholar
- Carlos Ferro-Soto, Luz Amparo Macias-Quintana, and Paula Vazquez-Rodriguez. 2018. Effect of Stakeholders-Oriented Behavior on the Performance of Sustainable Business. Sustainability. Vol. 10 (4724), 1–27.Google Scholar
- T. J. Rowley. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Journal, 22 (4), 887–910.Google Scholar
- D. B. Turban, and D. W. Greening. 1996. Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 40 (3), 658–672.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. I. Berman, A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha, T. M. Jones. 1999. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 488–506.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. J. Hillman, and G. D. Keim. 2001. Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, 125–139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. S. Harrison, D. A. Bosse, and R. A. Phillips. 2010. Managing for Stakeholders, Stakeholder Utility Functions, and Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 31, 58–74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. E. Greennley, G. J. Hooley, and J. Rudd. 2005. Market Orientation in a Multiple Stakeholder Orientation Context: Implications for Marketing Capabilities and Assets. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1483–1494.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. C. Ferrel, T. L. Gonzales-Padron, G. T. M. Hult, and I. Maignan. 2010. From Market Orientation to Stakeholder Orientation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, vol. 29 (spring), 93–96.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Maignan, T. L. Gonzales-Padron, G. T. M. Hult, and O. C. Ferrel. 2011. Stakeholder Orientation: Development And Testing of A Framework for Socially Responsible Marketing, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19 (4), 313–338.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. R. Dill. 1975. Public Participation in Corporate Planning – Strategic Management in a Kibitzer's World. Long Range Planning, vol. 8 (1), 57–63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Mitroff and J. Emshoff. 1979. On Strategic Assumption-Making, Academy of Management Review. vol. 4, 1–12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ekawee Vaitoonkiat and Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol. 2020. Stakeholder Orientation's Contribution to Firm Performance, The Moderating Effect of Perceived Market Uncertainty, vol. 43 (7), 863–883.Google Scholar
- Michela Le Pira, Edoardo Marcucci, Valerio Gatta, Matteo Ignaccolo, Giuseppe Inturri, Alessandro Pluchino, 2017. Towards A Decision-Support Procedure to Foster Stakeholder Involvement And Acceptability Of Urban Freight Transport Policies. European Transport Research. Review, vol. 9 (54), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Maria Eleonor Lindholm and Magnus Blinge. 2014. Assessing Knowledge And Awareness Of The Sustainable Urban Freight Transport Among Swedish Local Authority Policy Planners. Transport Policy, vol. 32, 124–131.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert M. Morgan and Shelby Hunt. 1994. The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 58 (July), 20–38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mei-Yun Leung, Alice Chong, S. Thomas NG, and Michael C. K. Cheung. Demystifying Stakeholders’ Commitment and Its Impacts on Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, vol. 22, 701–715.Google Scholar
- Ing-Long Wu, Cheng-Hung Chuang, and Chien-Hua Hsu. 2014. Information Sharing and Collaborative Behaviors in Enabling Supply Chain Performance: A Social Exchange Perspective. International Journal Production Economics. Vol. 148, 122–132.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonja Mlaker Kac, Irena Gorenak, Vojko Potocan. 2015. Influence of Relationship Commitment and Trust on Collaborative Behavior in Supply Chains. Promet-Traffic & Transportation. Vol. 27 (1), 77–84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert B. Handfield and Christian Bechtel. 2002. The Role of Trust and Relationship Structure in Improving Supply Chain Responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 31, 367–382.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hau L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, and Seungjin Whang. 1997. The bullwhip effect in supply chain. Sloan Management Review, vol. 38 (3, Spring), 93–102.Google Scholar
- R. R. Lummus, L. K. Duclos, and R. J. Vokurka. 2003. The impact of marketing initiatives on the supply chain. Supply Chain Management, vol. 8 (4), 317–323.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandy D. Jap. 1999. Pie-expansion efforts: collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 36 (4, November), 461–476.Google Scholar
- P. D. Larson and J. D. Kulchitsky. 2000. The use and impact of communication media in purchasing and supply management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 5 (2), 29–37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rodrigo Bandeira-de-Mello, Rosilene Marcon, and Anete Alberton. 2011. Performance Effects of Stakeholder Interaction in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Brazil. Brazilian Administration Review, vol. 8 (3), 329–350.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valerio Gatta, Edoardo Marcucci, Marialisa Nigro, Sergio Maria Patella, Simone Serafini, 2018. Public Transport-Based Crowdshipping for Sustainable City Logistics: Assessing Economic and Environmental Impacts. Sustainability, vol. 11 (1).Google Scholar
- Anjali Awasthi, Jean-Marie Proth. 2006. A Systems-Based Approach for City Logistics Decision Making. Journal of Advances in Management Research, vol. 3 (2), 7–17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qinghua Zhu, Joseph Sarkis, and Yong Geng. 2005. Green Supply Chain Management in China: Pressures, Practices and Performances. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Vol. 25 (5), 449–468.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roberta Alves, Renato da Silva Lima, David Custodio de Sena, Alexandre Ferreira de Pinho, and Jose Holguin-Veras. 2019. Agent-Based Simulation Model for Evaluating Urban Freight Policy to E-Commerce. Sustainability. Vol. 11 (4020), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Nilesh Anand, Mengchang Yang, J. H. R. van Duin, and Lori Tavasszy. 2012. GenCLOn: An Ontology for City Logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39 (15), 11944–11960.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Taniguchi, and D. Tamagawa. 2005. Evaluating City Logistics Measures Considering the Behavior of Several Stakeholders. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 6 (12), 3062–3076.Google Scholar
- Cindy Gurlain, Samuel Renauly, Francesco Ferrero, and Sebasties Faye. 2019. Decision Support Systems for Smarter and Sustainable Logistics of Construction Sites. Sustainability, vol. 11 (10), 2762.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leise K. Oliveira, Betty Barraza, Bruno V. Bertocini, Cassiano A. Isler, Dannubia R. Pires, Ellen C. N. Madalon, Jessica Lima, Jose G. V. Vieira, Leonardo H. Meira, lilian S. F. P. Bracarense, Renata A. Bandeira, Renata L. M. Oliveira, and Suellem Ferreira. 2018. An Overview of Problems and Solutions for Urban Freight Transport in Brazillian Cities. Sustainability, vol. 10 (4), 1233.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Francesco Russo and Antonio Comi. 2016. Urban Freight Transport Planning towards Green Goals: Synthetic Environmental Evidence from Tested Results. Sustainability, vol. 8 (381), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Ruth Banomyong. 2018. Collaboration in Supply Chain Management: A Resilience Perspective. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
- Kristin Scholten and Sanne Schilder. 2015. The Role of Collaboration in Supply Chain Resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. Vol. 20 (4), 471–484.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ahmet Doganay and Sinem Ergun. 2017. The Effect of Supply Chain Collaboration on Supply Chain Performance. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics. Vol. 4 (1), 30–39.Google Scholar
- Farhad Panahifar, P. J. Byrne, Mohammad Asif Salam, Cathal Heavey. 2018. Vol. 31 (3), 358–379.Google Scholar
- Nagehan Uca, Murat Cemberci, Mustafa Emre Civelek, and Huriye Yilmaz. 2017. The Effect of Trust in Supply Chain on the Firm Performance through Supply Chain Collaboration and Collaborative Advantage. Journal of Administrative Sciece, vol. 15 (30), 215–230.Google Scholar
- A. Vereecke and S. Muylle. 2006. Performance improvement through supply chain collaboration in Europe. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 26 (11), 1176–1198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Dyer and H. Singh. 1998. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, 660–679.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mei Cao and Qingyu Zhang. 2011. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 29, 163–180.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ki-Hyun Um and Sang-Man Kim. 2019. The Effects of Supply Chain Collaboration on Performance and Transaction Cost Advantage: The Moderation and Nonlinear Effects of Governance Mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 217, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.025Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Grover, J. Teng, and K. Fiedler. 2002. Investigating the role of information technology in building buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Association for Information Systems, vol. 3, 217–245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Botes, W. Niemann, and T. Kotze. 2017. Buyer-Supplier Collaboration and Supply Chain Resilience: A Case Study in the Petrochemical Industry. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering. Vol. 28 (4, December), 183–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.7166/28-4-1736Google Scholar
- R. Indrawan and P. Yaniawati. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Campuran. PT REFIKA Aditama. Bandung.Google Scholar
- Uma Sekaran and Roger Bougie. 2016. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2017. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Second Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., USA.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Why Supply Chain Collaboration Matters for Indonesian Dry Port Firms?
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Effect of Supply Chain Collaboration and Service Stakeholder Commitment on Dry Port Firm Performance
ICCMB '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Computers in Management and BusinessA dry port (or land port) is an inland area or intermodal port directly connected to a seaport. Cikarang Dry Port, as one of the best performing dry ports among other dry ports in Indonesia, has only contributed 18% to the loading and unloading volume ...
Schedule design for sustainable container supply chain networks with port time windows
This paper studies a practical liner shipping schedule design problem with port time windows for container supply chain networks. A mixed-integer nonlinear non-convex model that incorporates the availability of ports is proposed to minimize the sum of ...
Supply Chain Integration and Collaboration for Improving Supply Chain Performance: A Dynamic Capability Theory Perspective
HICSS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)In recent years, competition is no longer between organizations, but among supply chains. Organizational competences, such as relational competence, top management support and information technology (IT) competence, have been recognized as critical ...
Comments