skip to main content
10.1145/3450614.3463417acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Affect-Aware Learning for Social Robots

Published:22 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Robots designed to collaborate with human partners should be able to implicitly anticipate and adapt to their needs. To do so, robots need a framework supporting cognition and mutual understanding in social settings. We posit that even basic cognitive processes, such as learning, could benefit from considering the social and affective dimensions. In this direction, we propose a recently developed scenario, based on a competitive game, as a tool to steer the development of socially-aware competitive reinforcement learning (RL).

References

  1. Pablo Barros, Alessandra Sciutti, Anne C Bloem, Inge M Hootsmans, Lena M Opheij, Romain HA Toebosch, and Emilia Barakova. 2021. It’s Food Fight! Designing the Chef’s Hat Card Game for Affective-Aware HRI. In Comp. 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 524–528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Pablo Barros, Ana Tanevska, Francisco Cruz, and Alessandra Sciutti. 2020. Moody Learners-Explaining Competitive Behaviour of Reinforcement Learning Agents. In 2020 Joint IEEE 10th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob). IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pablo Barros, Ana Tanevska, Ozge Yalcin, and Alessandra Sciutti. 2020. Incorporating Rivalry in reinforcement learning for a competitive game.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nikhil Churamani, Matthias Kerzel, Erik Strahl, Pablo Barros, and Stefan Wermter. 2017. Teaching emotion expressions to a human companion robot using deep neural architectures. In 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 627–634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yiannis Demiris and Matthew Johnson. 2003. Distributed, predictive perception of actions: A biologically inspired robotics architecture for imitation and learning. Connection Science (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090310001655129Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yuan Gao, Fangkai Yang, Martin Frisk, Daniel Hemandez, Christopher Peters, and Ginevra Castellano. 2019. Learning Socially Appropriate Robot Approaching Behavior Toward Groups using Deep Reinforcement Learning. In 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Riitta Hari, Linda Henriksson, Sanna Malinen, and Lauri Parkkonen. 2015. Centrality of Social Interaction in Human Brain Function. Neuron 88, 1 (2015), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gavin J Kilduff. 2014. Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science 5, 8 (2014), 944–952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Iuliia Kotseruba and John K. Tsotsos. 2020. 40 years of cognitive architectures: core cognitive abilities and practical applications. Artificial Intelligence Review(2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9646-yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennifer S. Lerner, Ye Li, Piercarlo Valdesolo, and Karim S. Kassam. 2015. Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology(2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Antonio Lieto. 2021. Cognitive Design for Artificial Minds. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Antonio Lieto, William G Kennedy, Christian Lebiere, Oscar J Romero, Niels Taatgen, and Robert L West. 2018. Higher-level knowledge, rational and social levels constraints of the common model of the mind. Procedia computer science 145 (2018), 757–764.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zimo Liu, Jingya Wang, Shaogang Gong, Huchuan Lu, and Dacheng Tao. 2019. Deep reinforcement active learning for human-in-the-loop person re-identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 6122–6131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Federico Manzi, Angela Sorgente, Davide Massaro, Daniela Villani, Daniele Di Lernia, Clelia Malighetti, Andrea Gaggioli, Domenico Rossignoli, Giulio Sandini, Alessandra Sciutti, Francesco Rea, Mario A. Maggioni, Antonella Marchetti, and Giuseppe Riva. 2021. Emerging Adults’ Expectations About the Next Generation of Robots: Exploring Robotic Needs Through a Latent Profile Analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking (2021). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0161Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlo Mazzola, Alexander Mois Aroyo, Francesco Rea, and Alessandra Sciutti. 2020. Interacting with a social robot affects visual perception of space. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hamidreza Modares, Isura Ranatunga, Frank L Lewis, and Dan O Popa. 2015. Optimized assistive human–robot interaction using reinforcement learning. IEEE transactions on cybernetics 46, 3 (2015), 655–667.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ioannis Papaioannou and Oliver Lemon. 2017. Combining chat and task-based multimodal dialogue for more engaging HRI: A scalable method using reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 365–366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Giulio Sandini, Alessandra Sciutti, and David Vernon. 2021 (submitted). Cognitive Robots. In Encyclopedia of Robotics. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Damian A. Stanley and Ralph Adolphs. 2013. Toward a neural basis for social behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.038Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Tanevska, F. Rea, G. Sandini, L. Cañamero, and A. Sciutti. 2020. A Socially Adaptable Framework for Human-Robot Interaction. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00121Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen Tan Viet Tuyen, Sungmoon Jeong, and Nak Young Chong. 2018. Emotional Bodily Expressions for Culturally Competent Robots through Long Term Human-Robot Interaction. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2008–2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Greet Van de Perre, Hoang-Long Cao, Albert De Beir, Pablo Gómez Esteban, Dirk Lefeber, and Bram Vanderborght. 2018. Generic method for generating blended gestures and affective functional behaviors for social robots. Autonomous Robots 42, 3 (2018), 569–580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. David Vernon. 2014. Artificial cognitive systems: A primer. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. David Vernon, Claes von Hofsten, and Luciano Fadiga. 2016. Desiderata for developmental cognitive architectures. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 18 (2016), 116–127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Alessia Vignolo, Nicoletta Noceti, Francesco Rea, Alessandra Sciutti, Francesca Odone, and Giulio Sandini. 2017. Detecting biological motion for human–robot interaction: A link between perception and action. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4 (2017), 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Oriol Vinyals, Igor Babuschkin, Wojciech M Czarnecki, Michaël Mathieu, Andrew Dudzik, Junyoung Chung, David H Choi, Richard Powell, Timo Ewalds, Petko Georgiev, 2019. Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Nature 575, 7782 (2019), 350–354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Affect-Aware Learning for Social Robots
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              UMAP '21: Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
              June 2021
              431 pages
              ISBN:9781450383677
              DOI:10.1145/3450614

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 22 June 2021

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

              Upcoming Conference

            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format