skip to main content
10.1145/3450741.3466807acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Voices and Voids: Subverting Voice Assistant Systems through Performative Experiments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Responding to concerns such as privacy, surveillance, and the commodification of personal data with regards to voice assistants, this artistic research focuses on creating performative artifacts and vignettes that challenge artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies. By allowing AI voice assistants to listen to our most private conversations, we become receptive to their mediated care, while forgetting or ignoring how much these automated interactions have been pre-scripted. With our project Voices and Voids, we reclaim, examine, and ultimately transcode these voice assistant data through interdisciplinary performance and Post-Internet Art. In this paper, we thematically describe 12 vignettes which represent embodied and sonic experiments using a combination of design, data-driven art, cyber crafts, found-object and traditional percussion instruments, spoken word, and movement. We conclude with a discussion of how the experiments worked as a multifaceted whole, and how we used interdisciplinary methods as a central approach.

References

  1. Ashraf Abdul, Jo Vermeulen, Danding Wang, Brian Y. Lim, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2018. Trends and Trajectories for Explainable, Accountable and Intelligible Systems: An HCI Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–18. Retrieved February 15, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hazim Almuhimedi, Florian Schaub, Norman Sadeh, Idris Adjerid, Alessandro Acquisti, Joshua Gluck, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2015. Your Location has been Shared 5,398 Times! A Field Study on Mobile App Privacy Nudging. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 787–796. Retrieved February 15, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Maryanne Amacher. Maryanne Amacher - Monoskop. Retrieved February 17, 2021 from https://monoskop.org/Maryanne_AmacherGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tawfiq Ammari, Jofish Kaye, Janice Y. Tsai, and Frank Bentley. 2019. Music, Search, and IoT: How People (Really) Use Voice Assistants. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 3 (April 2019), 1–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Annette Arlander, Bruce Barton, Melanie Dreyer-Lude, and Ben Spatz (Eds.). 2017. Performance as Research: Knowledge, methods, impact (1st edition ed.). Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank Bentley, Chris Luvogt, Max Silverman, Rushani Wirasinghe, Brooke White, and Danielle Lottrjdge. 2018. Understanding the Long-Term Use of Smart Speaker Assistants. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 3 (September 2018), 1–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3264901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Heidi R. Biggs, Cayla Key, Audrey Desjardins, and Afroditi Psarra. 2021. Moving Design Research: GIFs as Research Tools. In Proceedings of the 2021 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’21), ACM Press, 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Simone Browne. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness (Illustrated edition ed.). Duke University Press Books, Durham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. John Cage. 2015. John Cage: Diary: How to Improve the World (1965)ghost (n edition ed.). Siglio, Los Angeles, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Julia Cambre, Samantha Reig, Queenie Kravitz, and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2020. “All Rise for the AI Director”: Eliciting Possible Futures of Voice Technology through Story Completion. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2051–2064. Retrieved January 25, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395479Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Linda Candy and Ernest Edmonds (Eds.). 2012. Interacting: Art, Research and the Creative Practitioner. Libri Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eugene Cho. 2019. Hey Google, Can I Ask You Something in Private? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300488Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. James Coupe. JAMES COUPE | Time-Clock. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from http://jamescoupe.com/?p=2476Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. James Coupe. JAMES COUPE | Let Us Pray. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from http://jamescoupe.com/?p=2439Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. James Coupe. JAMES COUPE | General Intellect. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from http://jamescoupe.com/?p=2093Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler. 2018. Anatomy of an AI System. Anatomy of an AI System. Retrieved February 21, 2021 from http://www.anatomyof.aiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Audrey Desjardins, Heidi R. Biggs, Cayla Key, and Jeremy E. Viny. 2020. IoT Data in the Home: Observing Entanglements and Drawing New Encounters. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stefania Druga, Randi Williams, Cynthia Breazeal, and Mitchel Resnick. 2017. “Hey Google is it OK if I eat you?”: Initial Explorations in Child-Agent Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 595–600. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3084330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Justin Edwards and Elaheh Sanoubari. 2019. A need for trust in conversational interface research. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342809Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 937–946. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2208516.2208538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wesley Goatley. Chthonic Rites | Wesley Goatley. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from https://www.wesleygoatley.com/chthonic-rites/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mary L. Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass (Illustrated edition ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Garnet Hertz. Experiments in Surveillance Capitalism. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from http://conceptlab.com/surveillancecapitalism/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Joseph Lindley, Haider Ali Akmal, Franziska Pilling, and Paul Coulton. 2020. Researching AI Legibility through Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376792Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ilan Manouach. Harvested – Ilan Manouach. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from https://ilanmanouach.com/project/harvested/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ilan Manouach. The Cubicle Island – Ilan Manouach. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from https://ilanmanouach.com/project/cubicleisland/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lauren Lee McCarthy. SOMEONE — Lauren Lee McCarthy. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from https://lauren-mccarthy.com/SOMEONEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicholas Micallef, Mike Just, Lynne Baillie, and Maher Alharby. 2017. Stop annoying me! an empirical investigation of the usability of app privacy notifications. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 371–375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Iohanna Nicenboim, Elisa Giaccardi, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Anuradha Venugopal Reddy, Yolande Strengers, James Pierce, and Johan Redström. 2020. More-Than-Human Design and AI: In Conversation with Agents. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’ 20 Companion), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 397–400. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395912Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Emmi Parviainen and Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard. 2020. Experiential Qualities of Whispering with Voice Assistants. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. Retrieved January 25, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. James Pierce. 2019. Smart Home Security Cameras and Shifting Lines of Creepiness: A Design-Led Inquiry. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45:1-45:14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. James Pierce, Sarah Fox, Nick Merrill, Richmond Wong, and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. An Interface Without A User: An Exploratory Design Study of Online Privacy Policies and Digital Legalese. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1345–1358. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196818Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Matt Ratto. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society 27, 4 (July 2011), 252–260. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Stuart Reeves. 2019. Conversation considered harmful? In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342796Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jonathan Reus. Anatomies of Intelligence. Retrieved February 9, 2021 from https://jonathanreus.com/portfolio/anatomies-of-intelligence/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jon Rogers, Loraine Clarke, Martin Skelly, Nick Taylor, Pete Thomas, Michelle Thorne, Solana Larsen, Katarzyna Odrozek, Julia Kloiber, Peter Bihr, Anab Jain, Jon Arden, and Max von Grafenstein. 2019. Our Friends Electric: Reflections on Advocacy and Design Research for the Voice Enabled Internet. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 114:1-114:13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kurt Schwitters. URSONATE de Kurt Schwitters. Retrieved February 19, 2021 from https://www.costis.org/x/schwitters/ursonate.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. William Seymour. 2018. How loyal is your Alexa? Imagining a Respectful Smart Assistant. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3180289Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Ben Shneiderman. 2020. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36, 6 (April 2020), 495–504. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Stephen Snow, Awais Hameed Khan, Stephen Viller, Ben Matthews, Scott Heiner, James Pierce, Ewa Luger, Richard Gomer, and Dorota Filipczuk. 2020. Speculative Designs for Emergent Personal Data Trails: Signs, Signals and Signifiers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Hildegard Westerkamp. Hildegard Westerkamp. Hildegard Westerkamp. Retrieved February 17, 2021 from http://www.hildegardwesterkamp.ca/main/index.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jordan Wirfs-Brock, Sarah Mennicken, and Jennifer Thom. 2020. Giving Voice to Silent Data: Designing with Personal Music Listening History. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Christian Wolff. Christian Wolff:: Foundation for Contemporary Arts. Retrieved February 17, 2021 from https://www.foundationforcontemporaryarts.org/recipients/christian-wolffGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Richmond Y. Wong, Ellen Van Wyk, and James Pierce. 2017. Real-Fictional Entanglements: Using Science Fiction and Design Fiction to Interrogate Sensing Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 567–579. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064682Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (1st edition ed.). PublicAffairs, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition
    June 2021
    581 pages
    ISBN:9781450383769
    DOI:10.1145/3450741

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format