skip to main content
10.1145/3450741.3467467acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Hacking the Creative Mind: An Insight Priming Tool to Facilitate Creative Problem-Solving

Published:22 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

People deal with problems every day, ranging from the banal to the piquant. On many occasions solutions to such problems occur in a moment of sudden comprehension called insight. Insight is a phenomenon that is often associated with high levels of intelligence and creativity and plays an important role in successful problem-solving. Due to its unpredictable occurrence, it has proven challenging to investigate insight systematically. This research explores a novel way to facilitate insight in creative problem-solving by activating processes that have been shown to be related to insight. Building on current research in Cognitive Neuroscience, the goal is to develop a creativity priming tool that would enable routine episodic boosts in creativity. For the on-going study, a computer interface is used to present a series of bespoke tasks created to modulate insight. The study is designed to help us understand better the dynamics of insight-based creative problem solving.

References

  1. Nancy C Andreasen. 2005. The creating brain: The neuroscience of genius.Dana Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Pamela I Ansburg and Katherine Hill. 2003. Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences 34, 7 (2003), 1141–1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Zsolt Beda, Steven M Smith, and Joseph Orr. 2020. Creativity on demand–Hacking into creative problem solving. NeuroImage (2020), 116867.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Edward M Bowden, Mark Jung-Beeman, Jessica Fleck, and John Kounios. 2005. New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in cognitive sciences 9, 7 (2005), 322–328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Richard P Chi and Allan W Snyder. 2011. Facilitate insight by non-invasive brain stimulation. PloS one 6, 2 (2011), e16655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Richard P Chi and Allan W Snyder. 2012. Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem. Neuroscience Letters 515, 2 (2012), 121–124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nancy D Chiaravalloti and Guila Glosser. 2004. Memory for faces dissociates from memory for location following anterior temporal lobectomy. Brain and Cognition 54, 1 (2004), 35–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. May I Conley, Danielle V Dellarco, Estee Rubien-Thomas, Alexandra O Cohen, Alessandra Cervera, Nim Tottenham, and BJ Casey. 2018. The racially diverse affective expression (RADIATE) face stimulus set. Psychiatry research 270(2018), 1059–1067.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Paul Egan and Jonathan Cagan. 2016. Human and computational approaches for design problem-solving. In Experimental Design Research. Springer, 187–205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the landscape of creativity support tools in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ronald S Friedman and Jens Förster. 2005. Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving.Journal of personality and social psychology 88, 2(2005), 263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mark Jung-Beeman, Edward M Bowden, Jason Haberman, Jennifer L Frymiare, Stella Arambel-Liu, Richard Greenblatt, Paul J Reber, and John Kounios. 2004. Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biol 2, 4 (2004), e97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Geir Kaufmann. 2003. The effect of mood on creativity in the innovative process. International handbook on innovation 1 (2003), 191–203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. John Kounios and Mark Beeman. 2009. The Aha! moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current directions in psychological science 18, 4 (2009), 210–216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. John Kounios and Mark Beeman. 2014. The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual review of psychology 65 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. John Kounios, Jennifer L Frymiare, Edward M Bowden, Jessica I Fleck, Karuna Subramaniam, Todd B Parrish, and Mark Jung-Beeman. 2006. The prepared mind: Neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight. Psychological science 17, 10 (2006), 882–890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Scott E Lipson, Oliver Sacks, and Orrin Devinsky. 2003. Selective emotional detachment from family after right temporal lobectomy. Epilepsy & Behavior 4, 3 (2003), 340–342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ksenija Marinkovic, Sharelle Baldwin, Maureen G Courtney, Thomas Witzel, Anders M Dale, and Eric Halgren. 2011. Right hemisphere has the last laugh: neural dynamics of joke appreciation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 11, 1(2011), 113–130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ingrid R Olson, Alan Plotzker, and Youssef Ezzyat. 2007. The enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing. Brain 130, 7 (2007), 1718–1731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Antti Oulasvirta and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Hci research as problem-solving. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4956–4967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gorana Pobric, Nira Mashal, Miriam Faust, and Michal Lavidor. 2008. The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 20, 1 (2008), 170–181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jiang Qiu, Hong Li, Jerwen Jou, Zhenzhen Wu, and Qinglin Zhang. 2008. Spatiotemporal cortical activation underlies mental preparation for successful riddle solving: an event-related potential study. Experimental brain research 186, 4 (2008), 629–634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S Ian Robertson. 2016. Problem solving: Perspectives from cognition and neuroscience. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Carola Salvi, Mark Beeman, Marom Bikson, Richard McKinley, and Jordan Grafman. 2020. TDCS to the right anterior temporal lobe facilitates insight problem-solving. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Carola Salvi, Emanuela Bricolo, Steven L Franconeri, John Kounios, and Mark Beeman. 2015. Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs. Psychonomic bulletin & review 22, 6 (2015), 1814–1819.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonathan W Schooler and Joseph Melcher. 1995. The ineffability of insight.(1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Robert J Sternberg and Janet E Davidson. 1995. The nature of insight.The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Fang Tian, Yuling Hou, Wenfeng Zhu, Arne Dietrich, Qinglin Zhang, Wenjing Yang, Qunlin Chen, Jiangzhou Sun, Qiu Jiang, and Guikang Cao. 2017. Getting the joke: Insight during humor comprehension–Evidence from an fMRI study. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017), 1835.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. F Tian, S Tu, J Qiu, JY Lv, DT Wei, YH Su, and QL Zhang. 2011. Neural correlates of mental preparation for successful insight problem solving. Behavioural brain research 216, 2 (2011), 626–630.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Suzanne K Vosburg. 1998. The effects of positive and negative mood on divergent-thinking performance. Creativity research journal 11, 2 (1998), 165–172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jennifer Walinga, J Barton Cunningham, and James N MacGregor. 2011. Training insight problem solving through focus on barriers and assumptions. The Journal of Creative Behavior 45, 1 (2011), 47–58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Robert W Weisberg. 2015. Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning 21, 1 (2015), 5–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition
    June 2021
    581 pages
    ISBN:9781450383769
    DOI:10.1145/3450741

    Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 June 2021

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format