skip to main content
10.1145/3450741.3467469acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Designing for Aesthetic Experience

Published:22 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital ways of representing fine art are significantly changing the way art is put on display. New exhibition formats including digital projections of fine art allow us to rethink how we can use technology to create art experiences. However, replicating the existing relationships between art, meta-text and visitor might not be the right way. In this project, I explore new ways of creating technologically enabled experiences with fine art paintings based on John Dewey’s concepts of aesthetic experience and expression. Utilizing a constructive design research approach, I create concrete prototypes and designs that expand research on aesthetics of interaction to propose new ways for museums to create art experiences.

References

  1. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, California. OCLC: 930589099.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques(DIS ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Peter Dalsgaard and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2008. Performing perception—staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 3 (Nov. 2008), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/1453152.1453156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. John Dewey. 2005. Art as Experience. Penguin. Google-Books-ID: aAbqAGo5MwwC original-date: 1934.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carol Duncan. 2005. The art museum as ritual. Heritage, museums and galleries: an introductory reader (2005), 78–88. Publisher: Routledge London and New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marc Hassenzahl. 2010. Experience design: technology for all the right reasons. Number 8 in Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, Calif.OCLC: 823256284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ilpo Kalevi Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redström, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Design research through practice: from the lab, field, and showroom. Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier, Waltham, MA. OCLC: ocn714729504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Eva Lenz, Marc Hassenzahl, and Sarah Diefenbach. 2017. Aesthetic interaction as fit between interaction attributes and experiential qualities. New Ideas in Psychology 47 (Dec. 2017), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Youn-kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, Heekyoung Jung, and Justin Donaldson. 2007. Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces - DPPI ’07. ACM Press, Helsinki, Finland, 239. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314161.1314183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Marianne Graves Petersen, Ole Sejer Iversen, Peter Gall Krogh, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2004. Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS ’04. ACM Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 269. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Naomi Rea. 2020. ’Museums Can Learn From the Entertainment Industry’: Why the Van Gogh Museum Is Launching an Experiential Pop-Up in London. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/van-gogh-museum-experience-london-1777419 Section: Art World.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Erik Stolterman and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. Concept-Driven Interaction Design Research. Human–Computer Interaction 25, 2 (May 2010), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020903586696Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition
    June 2021
    581 pages
    ISBN:9781450383769
    DOI:10.1145/3450741

    Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 June 2021

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format