skip to main content
10.1145/3451400.3451408acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Does Problem-Based Learning Enhance Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics Learning? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published:29 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

There have been many literatures presenting a meta-analysis on the overall effect of problem-based learning (PBL). However, there has been no specific meta-analysis on the overall effect of PBL on higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). The suggestion to promote HOTS supported by PBL leads to the need to consider the implications of related primary studies' heterogeneity level. This study aims to summarize, estimate, and evaluate the effect of PBL on Indonesian students’ HOTS in Mathematics learning using systematic review and meta-analysis that synthesize nine relevant primary studies published in Scopus journals and proceedings during 2016 - 2020. The Hedge equation was chosen to determine its effect size using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. The result revealed that the overall implementation of PBL had a very high positive effect significantly in enhancing Indonesian students’ HOTS in Mathematics learning based on random effect model. Moreover, the characteristics of HOTS did not cause the heterogeneity of the study results on the effect of PBL on students’ HOTS. These results suggest that Indonesian Mathematics teachers and lecturers should select PBL as one of the best solutions to enhance students’ HOTS in Mathematics learning.

References

  1. Bellamy, C. 2007. Online democratic deliberation in a time of information abundance. Fast Capitalism, 2(2), 121 – 126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Apriyani, T. D., Fadiawati, N., and Syamsuri, M. M. F. 2019. The effectiveness of problem-based learning on hoax information to improve students' critical thinking skills. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 3(1), 15 – 22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sellnow, T. L., Parrish, A., and Samenas, L. 2019. From hoax as crisis to crisis as a hoax: Fake news and information disorder as disruptions to the discourse of renewal. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 2(1), 121 – 142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tukina, Mozin, A. R., and Sanjaya, M. 2020. Disruptive innovation: A case of solving hoax information in Indonesia. Humaniora, 11(1), 7 – 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lewis, A., and Smith, D. 1993. Defining higher-order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131 – 137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Glaser, R. 1984. Education and thinking. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93 – 104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Newmann, F. M. 1988. Higher-order thinking in the high school curriculum. NASSP Bulletin, 72, 58 – 64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Allen, D. E., Duch, B. J., and Groh, S. E. 1996. The power of problem-based learning in teaching introductory science courses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 43 - 52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. 2004. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235 – 266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Newman, M. J. (2005). Problem-Based Learning: An Introduction and Overview of the Key Features of the Approach. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 32(1),12 – 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yew, E. H. J., and Goh, K. 2016. Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and its impact on learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 1 – 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Nargundkar, S., Samaddar, S., and Mukhopadhyay, S. 2014. A guided problem-based learning (PBL) approach: Impact on critical thinking. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 12(2), 91 – 108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Neber, H., and Neuhaus, B. J. 2013. Creativity and problem-based learning (PBL): A neglected relation. In: Tan, A. G. (eds) Creativity, Talent, and Excellence. Springer, Singapore. 43 – 56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Du, X. Y., Emmersen, J., Toft, E., and Sun, B. 2013. PBL and critical thinking disposition in Chinese medical students-A randomized cross-sectional study. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 72 – 83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Samura, A. O., Juandi, D., and Darhim. 2020. Improving mathematical critical thinking skills through problem-based learning. Proceedings in International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education 2019 (ICMScE 2019), 1 – 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wahyu, E. S., Sahyar., dan Ginting, E. M. 2017. The effect of problem-based learning (PBL) model toward a student's critical thinking and problem-solving ability in senior high school. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 633 – 638.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yolanda, F. 2019. The effect of problem-based learning on mathematical critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Proceedings in ICRIEMS 6, 1 – 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Katminingsih, Y., and Widodo, S. 2015. Pengaruh model pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa ditinjau menurut gender siswa SD Negeri Tarokan Kediri. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Matematika, 1(1), 77 – 89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pohan, A. M., Asmin, and Menanti, A. 2020. The effect of problem-based learning and learning motivation of mathematical problem-solving skills of class 5 students at SDN 0407 Mondang. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal, 3(1), 531 – 539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ahdhianto, E., Marsigit, Haryanto, and Nurfauzi, Y. 2020. Improving fifth-grade students’ mathematical problem-solving and critical thinking skills using problem-based learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 2012 – 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Indriani, D. S., Widyasari, W., Amril, L. O. 2019. Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa pada materi bilangan pecahan kelas IV SDIT At-Thoriq. E-Journal Skripsi: Fakultas Keguruan Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 1 – 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ali, R., Hukamdad, Akhter, A., and Khan, A. 2010. Effect of using the problem-solving method in teaching mathematics on the achievement of mathematics students. Asian Social Science, 6(2), 67 – 72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nahdi, D. S. 2018. Eksperimentasi model problem-based learning dan model guided discovery learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari self -efficacy siswa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 4(1), 50 – 56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Cumming, G. 2012. Understanding the new statistics effect sizes, confidence, intervals, and meta-analysis. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. L. 1981. Meta-analysis in social research. London: Sage Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Boreinstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., and Rothstein, H. R. 2009. Introduction to meta-analysis. United Kingdom: John Willey & Sons Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Cleophas, T. J., and Zwinderman, A. H. 2017. The modern meta-analysis (review and update of methodologies). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mike, W., and Cheung, L. 2015. Meta-analysis: A structural equational modeling approach. United Kingdom: John Willey & Sons Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shelby, L. B., and Vaske, J. J. 2008. Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences, 30, 96 – 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Miterianifa, Trisnayanti, Y., Khoiri, A., and Ayu, H. D. 2019. Meta-analysis: The effect of problem-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills. Proceedings in the 2nd International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Environment, and Education 2019, July 26 -28, Surakarta, Indonesia, 2194 (1), 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Ceviker Ay, S., and Orhan, A. 2020. The effect of different critical thinking teaching approaches on critical thinking skills: A meta-analysis study. Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 49, 88 – 111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kong, L., Qin, B., Zhou, Y., Mou, S., and Gao, H. 2014. The effectiveness of problem-based learning on the development of nursing students' critical thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 458 – 469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Niu, L., Linda, S., Behar_Horenstein, and Garvan, C. W. 2013. Do instructional interventions influence college students' critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 114 – 128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Lo, C. O., and Feng, L. 2020. Teaching higher-order thinking skills to gifted students: A meta-analysis. Gifted Education International, 36(2), 196 - 217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Tamur, M., and Juandi, D. 2020. Effectiveness of constructivism-based learning models against students' mathematical creative thinking abilities in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. Proceedings in MSCEIS 2019, October 12, Bandung, Indonesia, 1 – 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Park, I. 2019. The effect of problem-based learning strategies (PBL) on problem-solving skills: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(10), 197 – 205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothestein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., and Boreinstein, M. 2005. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustment. USA: John Willey & Sons Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ustun, U., and Eryilmaz, A. 2014. A research methodology to conduct effective research syntheses: Meta-analysis. Education and Science, 39 (174), 1 – 32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., and Pillai, V. 2008. Systematic review and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., and Abrami, P. C. 2014.A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing Higher Education, 26, 87 – 122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ionnidas, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., and Moher, D. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1 – 34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Orwin, R. G., Zelinsky, N. A. M., and Vevea, J. L. 2019. Evaluating Coding Decisions. In Copper, H., Hedges, L. V., dan Valentine, J. C., The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 3rd edition. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Lipsey, M. W., and Wilson, D. B. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Copper, H., Hedges, L. V., and Valentine, J. C. 2019. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 3rd edition. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Viera, A. J., and Garret, J. M. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: The Kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360 – 363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Thalheimer, W., and Cook, S. How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology, Retrieved from http://work-learning.com/effect_size.htm, 1 – 9, September 29, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Light, R., and Pillemer, D. 1984. Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Havard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Duval, S., and Tweedie, R. 2000. Trim and fill: A simple funnel plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455 – 463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Gleser, L. J., and Olkin, I. 1996. Models for estimating the number of unpublished studies. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 2493 – 2507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Higgins, J.P., and Thompson, S. G. 2002. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539 – 1558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., and Altman, D. G. 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 327, 557 – 560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Siddiq, F., and Scherer, R. 2019. Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27, 205 – 217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Savery, J. R. 2006. Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9 – 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Torp, L., and Sage, S. 2002. Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmidt, H. G. 1983. Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11 – 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Barrows, H. S. 1996. Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 3 – 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Hung, W. 2006. The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 55 – 77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Dagyar, D., and Demirel, M. 2015. Effects of problem-based learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Education and Science, 40(181), 139 – 174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Suparman, Juandi, D., and Tamur, M. 2021. Review of problem-based learning trends in 2010-2020: A meta-analysis study of the effect of problem-based learning in enhancing mathematical problem-solving skills of Indonesian students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(012103), 1 – 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBDE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Big Data and Education
    February 2021
    130 pages
    ISBN:9781450389389
    DOI:10.1145/3451400

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format