skip to main content
10.1145/3452144.3452153acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Development of Lesson Plan Based on Backward Design to Improve Students' Critical Thinking at Elementary School

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 April 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This research and development aim to develop a Lesson Plan Based on Backward Design that is feasible to improve the critical thinking of elementary school students. Research and development refer to Borg & Gall's theory. The study population was fifth-grade educators at Elementary School Dr. Wahidin Husodo in Metro, Lampung. The sample was determined using a purposive sampling technique of seven educators from different elementary schools. Data was collected through a questionnaire, observation and test results. The results showed that the Lesson Plan that developed was feasible to use and showed that it could improve students' critical thinking. This is proved by the increase in student learning outcomes and students' critical thinking skills after using a backward design lesson plan.

References

  1. N. M. Fuad, S. Zubaidah, S. Mahanal, and E. Suarsini, "Improving junior high schools' critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning" Int. J. Instr., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 101--116, 2017, doi: 10.12973/iji.2017.1017a.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B. B. Yazar Soyadι, "Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments" J. Gift. Educ. Creat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 71--71, 2015, doi: 10.18200/jgedc.2015214253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. R. Md, "21st Century Skill 'Problem Solving': Defining the Concept" Asian J. Interdiscip. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 64--74, 2019, doi: 10.34256/ajir1917.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. N. Che Teh, N. H. Isa, and A. Omar, "Critical Thinking Module in Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills among Secondary School Students" AJELP Asian J. English Lang. Pedagog., vol. 5, pp. 68--79, 2017, doi: 10.37134/ajelp.vol5.6.2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. H. Güner Berkant and S. Baysal, "Allosteric Learning Model in English Lesson: Teachers' Views, the Instructions of Curriculum and Course Book, A Sample of Daily Lesson Plan" Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 84--93, 2017, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. N. M. MZ and S. Suhardi, "Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Tematik-Integratif Berbasis Sastra Bagi Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar" J. Prima Edukasia, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 176, 2016, doi: 10.21831/jpe.v4i2.7717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. N. Bahr, "Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking in Higher Education" Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn., vol. 4, no. 2, 2010, doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Hodaeian, "The effect of Backward Design on Intermediate EFL Learners ' L2 Reading Comprehension: Focusing on Learners ' Attitudes" vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 80--93, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. R. Dale and W. R. Borg, "Educational Research: An Introduction" Br. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 146, 1965, doi: 10.2307/3119062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Daniele and L. G. Hubert-Pfalzgraf, "Synthesis of nanocrystalline Y2O3/Pr3+ from heterometallic alkoxide via sol-gel process" Mater. Lett., vol. 58, no. 14, pp. 1989--1992, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2003.12.021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The Development of Lesson Plan Based on Backward Design to Improve Students' Critical Thinking at Elementary School

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICLIQE 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
      September 2020
      868 pages
      ISBN:9781450375726
      DOI:10.1145/3452144

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader