skip to main content
10.1145/3452144.3452194acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Theme Choice and Thematic Progression of Discussion Section in Engineering English Lectures

Published: 25 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In the fourth industrial revolution, globalization of higher education has been significant demands for higher education across national borders, both in the field of teaching and research. Some research has found that linguistic issues become a major problem for most Indonesian students who are studying at overseas universities. The students mostly faced problem in capturing lecture contents or lecture important points delivered by lecturers. This study then looked into the types and functions of theme choices and thematic progression deployed in Engineering English Lecture-Discussion in a university in the Netherlands, where English is used as the medium instruction. The Hallidayan notion of Theme (1994) and thematic progression (Eggins, 2004) were applied. By employing a content qualitative analysis approach, seven lecturers were selected and video-taped during formal teaching hours. A total of 394 clauses in the Engineering English Lecture discussion were identified and analyzed. The results showed that all clauses have an ideational point of departure or theme and also, the speaker may choose to express an interpersonal and a textual theme. The ideational theme and the combination of constant - zig-zag Theme pattern dominantly occupied the theme system chosen for the Engineering English Lecture-Discussion. In summary, theme choice and progression can be used to develop a text and to facilitate the understanding of the message. So, it will be useful for EFL students to achieve specifiable goals such a lecture content.

References

[1]
Cheng, S.W. 2012. "That's it for today": Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for specific purposes. 31 234--248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.004
[2]
Jalilifar, A, Shahri, S, Mir. F. 2016. Persian Academic Lecture Closings: An Investigation into Verbal and Non-verbal Ending Indicators. Linguistik online 75, 1-16 http://dx.doi.org/10.13092/lo.75.2515.
[3]
Christie, F. 1995. Pedagogic Discourse in the Primary School. Linguistics and Education, 7, 221--242.
[4]
Sunardi, S., Tarjana, M. S., Poedjosoedarmo, S., & Santosa, R. 2018. Interpersonal Realizations of Pedagogic Discourse in Indonesian EFL Classrooms. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 2(3), 205--215. https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v2i3.5678.
[5]
Kuswoyo, H. & Rido, A. 2019. Process Types of Transitivity System in Engineering Lecture Introduction: A Pedagogic Discourse. Lingua, Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra, Vol. 19, (2), 85--96.
[6]
Young, L.1995: "University lectures: Macro-structure and micro-features". In: Flowerdew, John (ed.): Academic listening: Research perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 159--176.
[7]
Rido, A. 2015. The use of discourse markers as an interactive feature in science lecture discourse in L2 setting. TEFLIN Journal, 21 (1), 90--10.
[8]
Yeh, K & Chih Huang, C. 2016. Mandarin-speaking children's use of the discourse markers hao 'okay' and dui 'right' in peer interaction. Language Sciences. 57, 1--20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.004.
[9]
Rido, A, Nambiar, R.M.K. Ibrahim, N. 2014. Interaction strategies of master teachers in Indonesian vocational classroom: A case study. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 21(3): 85 - 98.
[10]
Rido, A. Nambiar, R.M. K, Ibrahim, N. 2016.Teaching and Classroom Management Strategies of Indonesian Master Teachers: Investigating a Vocational English Classroom. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3): 93 - 109.
[11]
Rido, A & Sari, F.M. 2018. Characteristics of classroom interaction of English language teachers in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Language Education, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2018 pp. 40--50.
[12]
Kuswoyo, H, Sujatna, E.T.S, Maulia, L, & Rido, Akhyar. 2020. Cohesive Conjunctions and and so as Discourse Strategies in English Native and Non-Native Engineering Lecturers: A Corpus-Based Study. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29 (7), 2322--2335.
[13]
Morell, T. (2007). What enhances EFL students' participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 222--237.
[14]
Zare, Javad & Keivanloo-Shahrestanaki, Zahra. 2017. Genre awareness and academic lecture comprehension: The impact of teaching importance markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol.27, Pages 31--41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.03.001
[15]
Azer, S.A. 2009. What makes a great lecture? Use of lectures in a hybrid PBL curriculum. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 25(3), 109--115.
[16]
Farangi, M.R. 2015. Exploring the nature of classroom discourse in grammar class: Systemic functional grammar. Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
[17]
Christie, F. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. New York:Continuum.
[18]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) London: Hodder education.
[19]
Eggins, S. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: continuum.
[20]
Christie, F. 1991. Pedagogical and Content Registers in a Writing Lesson. Linguistics and Education 3, 203--324.
[21]
Emilia, E. 2016. Pendekatan berbasis Teks: dalam pengajaran bahasa Inggris. Bandung: Kiblat Buku Utama.
[22]
Institute of International Education. 2017. Open doors 2017 report: Information and data tables. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org.
[23]
Kim, J, Kim, E.G, Kweon, S.O. 2018. Challenges in implementing English-medium instruction: Perspectives of Humanities and Social Sciences professors teaching engineering students. English for Specific Purposes, 51, PAGES. 111--123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.005
[24]
Spring, J. 2008. Globalization of Education: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
[25]
Thompson, S. 1994. Frameworks and Contexts: A Genre-Based Approach to Analyzing Lecture Introductions. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 171--186.
[26]
Lee, J.J. 2009: "Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions". English for Specific Purposes 28/1: 42--57.
[27]
Shamsudin, S & Ebrahimi, S J. 2013. Analysis of the moves of engineering lecture introductions. Procedia: social and behaviour sciences, 70, 1303 -1311.
[28]
Lee, J.J., 2011. "A Genre Analysis of Second Language Classroom Discourse: Exploring the Rhetorical, Linguistic, and Contextual Dimensions of Language Lessons." Dissertation, Georgia State University. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/alesl_diss/20.
[29]
Shamsudin, S, Yusof, Masdinah Alauyah Md, Raof, Abdul Halim Abdul. 2012. Lecture Language in Malaysian Engineering Lecture Corpus, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences 56 (2012) 298--306, Teknologi Malaysia
[30]
Shamsudin, S, Yusof, Masdinah Alauyah Md, Raof, Abdul Halim Abdul. 2016. Teaching Discussion Section: Graduate Student Instructor. University of California: GSIs Teaching & Resource Center. (Retrieved on August, 1 2020 at https://gsi.berkeley.edu/gsi-guide-contents/discussion-intro/)
[31]
Mutrofin, D, I Nyoman Sudana, A, I Wayan, S, Punaji. 2017. The Effect of Instructional Methods (Lecture-Discussion versus Group Discussion) and Teaching Talent on Teacher Trainees Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8, No.9
[32]
Shokri, A. 2016. Peripheral Themes in Applied Linguistics Articles. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(1), pages. 138--156, 10.22055/RALS.2016.11781.
[33]
Chen, Xin, Song, Yunxia, Wang, Shouhong. 2011. A Research on EFL Reading Teaching from the Perspective of Theme-Rheme Theory with Broad Network Materials in S. Lin and X. Huang (Eds.): CSEE 2011, Part IV, CCIS 217, pp. 313--318.
[34]
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
[35]
Herriman, J. 2011. Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners" writing in English, Nordic Journal of English studies. Vol.10, (1), 1--28
[36]
Kuswoyo, H, Sujatna, E.T.S, Citraresmana, E. 2013. Theme of Imperative Clause in Political Advertising Slogan, Research Journal of English Language and Literature, Vol.1.Issue.4, pages. 162--168.
[37]
Wei, J. 2016. Thematic choice in Chinese college students' English essays. English for Specific Purposes, 41 (2016) 50-67, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.09.003
[38]
McCabe-Hidalgo, A., & Belmonte, I. 1998. Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. Didáctica: Lengua y Literatura, 10, 13
[39]
Dejica-Cartis, D & Cozma, M. 2013. Using Theme-Rheme analysis for improving coherence and cohesion in target-texts: a methodological approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 890--894.
[40]
Backlund. 1992. Theme in English Telephone Conversation. Language Sciences, Volume 14, Number 4, pp. 545--564.
[41]
Trillo, J. R. 1994. Ahm, ehm, you call it theme?. A thematic approach to spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 495--509.
[42]
Taboada, M. & Lavid, J. 2003. Rhetorical and thematic patterns in scheduling dialogues: A generic characterization. Functions of Language 10:2 (2003), 147--178
[43]
Leong Ping, A. 2005. Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies, 7(6).701--732.
[44]
Kuswoyo, H. 2016. Thematic Structure in Barack Obama's Press Conference:A Systemic Functional Grammar Study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. Vol. 7 No. 2; pages. 258--267.
[45]
Hawes & Thoams. 2015. Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals, Ampersand 2 (2015) 93-100, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002
[46]
Alsop, S & Nesi, H. 2015. Introductions in engineering lectures. Conference: Proceedings of the 8th International Corpus Linguistics conference (CL2015), At: Lancaster University, UK.
[47]
Cresswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods approach. U.S.A: SAGE Publication, Inc.
[48]
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[49]
Moleong, Lexy J. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja
[50]
Satori & Komariah. 2017.Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[51]
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
[52]
Bengtsson, M. 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open Volume 2, Pages 8-14
[53]
Mahsun. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
[54]
Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana
[55]
Mauranen, A. 1999. What sort of theme is there? A translational perspective. In Languages in Contrast 2(1) (pp. 57--86)
[56]
Halliday, M.A.K 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
[57]
Sujatna, E. T. S., Pamungkas, K., & Heriyanto, H. 2018. Thematic Progression of Higher Education Advertorials: A Case Study in English and Bahasa Indonesia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(8) 1--11.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)‘Thank You Very Much’: Feedback Strategies in University English Literature Lecture InteractionEuropean Journal of Educational Research10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.29volume-12-2023:volume-12-issue-1-january-2023(29-40)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2023

Index Terms

  1. Theme Choice and Thematic Progression of Discussion Section in Engineering English Lectures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICLIQE 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
    September 2020
    868 pages
    ISBN:9781450375726
    DOI:10.1145/3452144
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 April 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. engineering English lecture
    2. systemic functional linguistics
    3. thematic choice
    4. thematic progression

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICLIQE 2020

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)78
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)‘Thank You Very Much’: Feedback Strategies in University English Literature Lecture InteractionEuropean Journal of Educational Research10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.29volume-12-2023:volume-12-issue-1-january-2023(29-40)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media