skip to main content
10.1145/3452144.3452211acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality Management at SDN Percobaan 3 Pakem Sleman, Yogyakarta

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 April 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to describe the quality management at SDN Percobaan 3 PAKEM Sleman Yogyakarta. The method used in this research is qualitative with a phenomenological approach. Data collection was carried out by observation, interviews, and documentation. The results are 1. Principals, teachers, and employees are committed to hard work, smart work, conscientious work, and "ikhlas" work have become a work culture at SDN Percobaan 3 PAKEM, 2. The Principal always builds a strong synergy between the government, namely the Education Office and District Government, and involves the community who are part of the "Tri Pusat Pendidikan", 3. Accountable, transparent, and participatory principles are applied in the management of all school components, starting from School-Based Management, learning components, libraries, extracurricular activities, and student health unit, 4. The principal gives directions to teachers and staff to participate in creating quality innovations in each component, and finally, 5) In terms of learning quality, the principal and teachers create learning innovations called "Pola Asuh 28 "and" Pusaka Pelajar". The results of this study concluded that, as one of the reference schools, SDN Percobaan 3 Pakem has constraints in funding, especially in preparing the quality of schools with ISO standards.

References

  1. Abdullah Çalişkan, Ömer Turunç and İrfan Akkoç Related information. (2014). How does organisational culture affect the innovative behaviours? The mediating role of perceived insider status. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2014.064364. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbar, Sa'dun dan Hadi Sriwiyana. (2010). Pengembangan kurikulum dan Pembelajaran: Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Cipta Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Armistead, C.G., G. Clark. (1996). Customer Service and Support (Layanan dan Dukungan Kepada Pelanggan). PT Elex Media Komputindo - Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta, hal. 43--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Athina Skapinaki and Maria Salamoura. (2020). Investigating primary school quality using teachers' self-efficacy and satisfaction. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 17--24. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3603340. www.jthsm.grGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardine Wirjana. (2007). Mencapai Manajemen Berkualitas. Andi: Yopgyakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Claudia Herresthal. 2020. Performance-Based Rankings and School Quality. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa036.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Connelly, F. Michael, dan D. Jean Clandinin. (1988). Teacher as Curriculum Planners, Amsterdam Venue: Teacher College Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, John W. (2014). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. YOGYAKARTA: PUSTAKA PELAJAR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosby, P.B. (1979). Quality is Free: The Art of Marking Quality Certain. New. York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cucun Sunaengsih, Muthahharah Thahir, Badrud Tamam, Bunga Safitri. 2020. Analysis of The Management Aspect Of Primary School Quality Improvement. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/EARR/article/view/22476. Doi: 10.17509/earr.v2i2.22476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Erasmus+. A Whole School Approach to Tackling Early School Leaving. (2005). Directorate-General for Education and Culture, Education & Training 2020 / Schools policy, 2015. https://ec.europa.euGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Feigenbaum A.V. (1991). Total Quality Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. I. Aldrich. 2019. The Future of the Primary School. https://journals.sagepub.com. doi/10.1177/002205749203602212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Garvin, David A. (1988). Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge. New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hümeyra Uysal and Alper YORULMAZ. 2020. Primary School First Grade Students' Parents' Metaphorical Perception of the Concepts of "Primary School" and "Primary School Teacher". International Journal of Field Education. Ijofe, 2020, 6 (1), 92--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Husain Salilul Akareem and Syed Shahadat Hossain. 2016. Determinants of education quality: what makes students' perception different? https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrer20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Imam, S Tunggal dan Amin W Tunggal. (2002). Membangun Konsep Corporate. Governance. Havarindo: Jakarta. Indriantoro, Nur Bambang Supomo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenny Waller and Derek Allen. (1995). The T.Q.M. Toolkit: A Guide to Practical Techniques for Total Quality Management. Kogan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Juran, J.M. (1989). Juran on Quality by Design. New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Hasan, Md. S. Islam, A. T. Shams, H. Gupta. 2018. Total Quality Management (TQM): Implementation in Primary Education System of Bangladesh. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering. Int. J. Res. Ind. Eng. Vol. 7, No. 3 (2018) 370--380. www.riejournal.com. DOI: 10.22105/riej.2018.128170.1041.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kadariah. (2019). Analysis of the Principal's Role in Improving the Quality of Primary School Management. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/iap. DOI: 10.26858/jiap.v9i2.12333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lunenburg and Irby. (2006).The Principalship. Vision to Action. USA: Cengage Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin Skutil. 2018. Evaluation as One of the Key Aspects of Primary School Education. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iced-18/25905554. https://doi.org/10.2991/iced-18.2018.5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McMillan, J.H., and Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in Education. New York: Longman, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Miles, B. Mathew dan Michael Huberman. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mohamad Farhan TaufikSiti and Irene Astuti Dwiningrum. (2020). Social Capital and School Quality. 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Character Educations (ICoSSCE 2019). Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200130.042.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Natasa Brankovic, Vesna Rodić, Svetlana Kostovic. (2012). Determination of indicators of school culture in primary schools. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299466642Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Njora Hungi. (2017). Quality of Primary School Inputs in Kenya. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315108780. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20391.75685.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Nursuhana Alauddin and Shu Yamada. (2019). Overview of Deming Criteria for Total Quality Management Conceptual Framework Design in Education Services. DOI: 10.26666/rmp.jesr.2019.5.3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Permendikbud RI No 28 Tahun 2016. Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Dasar dan Menegah.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Pratt, David. (1980). Curriculum Design and Development, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Robbins, Stephen P. (1996). Perilaku Organisasi Edisi ke 7 (Jilid II). Jakarta: Prehallindo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Saadeddine Shehab and Emma Mercier. (2019). Implementing collaborative learning in classrooms: science teachers' perspectives. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJIIE.2019.102597Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sompong Panhoon and Suwimon Wongwanich. 2014. An Analysis of Teacher Feedback for Improving Teaching Quality in Primary Schools. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275543341. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.902.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 20 Tahun 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Quality Management at SDN Percobaan 3 Pakem Sleman, Yogyakarta

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICLIQE 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
      September 2020
      868 pages
      ISBN:9781450375726
      DOI:10.1145/3452144

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader