skip to main content
10.1145/3452144.3452282acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development Concept of Controversial History Material in Senior High School in Indonesia

Published: 25 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

This research aims to formulate the development concept of controversial history material in senior high school in Indonesia. The type of research is qualitative research. The method used is library research. The object of study is the 30 September 1965 Movement or the G 30 S. Data collection uses the library source, namely curriculum documents, textbooks, and any other sources relevant. Data is processed and validated through source triangulation. Data that has been collected is analyzed by interactive analysis. The result of the research shows that the construction of the G 30 S material in history textbooks in senior high school is dominated by one interpretation versions. It was required material development. Various versions of the G 30 S need to be integrated into the substance of the event material so that it reflects the balance. Various interpretation versions of the G 30 S are presented by revealing the strengths and weaknesses of each interpretation versions and are integrated into the construction of the material. With the development concept of these materials, the construction of the material about the G 30 S can be more comprehensive and balances.

References

[1]
Bambang Purwanto. 2001. Reality And Myth In Contemporary Indonesian History. Humaniora, VIII (2), 111--123.http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/detail.php?dataId=7927.
[2]
Tsabit Azinar Ahmad. 2010. Implementasi Critical Pedagogy dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Kontroversial di SMA Negeri Kota Semarang. Master's Thesis at Universitas Sebelas Maret. Tesis Surakarta.
[3]
Krisnadi. 2006. Kontroversi Seputar G 30 S 1965. Paper in Socialization of History Curriculum G 30 S at Hall of Education and Culture Service, Central Java, 7 December.
[4]
Tsabit Azinar Ahmad, Ibnu Sodiq, Andi Suryadi. 2014. Kendala-Kendala Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Kontroversial di SMA Negeri Kota Semarang. Paramita, 24(2), 266--276. v24i2.3128.
[5]
Ariel Heryanto. 1999. Where Communism Never Dies, Violence, Trauma and Narration in The Last Cold War Capitalist Authoritarian State. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(2), 147--177.
[6]
Mary S and Zurbuchen. 2002. History, Memory, and the '1965 Incident' in Indonesia. Asian Survey, XLII(4), 561--581.
[7]
Sri Lestari Wahyuningroem. 2013. Seducing for Truth and Justice: Civil Society Initiatives for the 1965 Mass Violence in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32(3), 115--142, 2013. 00306.
[8]
Bambang Purwanto. 2009. Sejarah, Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Kontroversial: Sebuah Catatan Diskusi. Paper in Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Sejarah Kontroversial: Problem dan Solusi. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 28 Mei.
[9]
Hakimul Ikhwan, Vissia Ita Yulianto, Gilang Desta Parahita. 2019. The Contestation of Social Memory in the New Media: A Case Study of the 1965 Killings in Indonesia. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(1), 3--16.
[10]
Max Lane. 2015. 50 Years since 30 September, 1965: The Gradual Erosion of a Political Taboo. Perspektive, 2015(66), 1--10. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wpcontent/uploads/pdfs/ ISEAS_Perspective_2015_66.pdf
[11]
Ketut Sedana Arta. 2012. Kurikulum dan Kontroversi Buku Teks Sejarah Dalam KTSP. Media Komun. FIS, 11(1), 154--168.
[12]
Thomas Misco. 2007. Using Curriculum Deliberation to Address Controversial Issues: Developing Holocaust Education Curriculum for Latvian School. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 2(8), 1--12.
[13]
Mary Soley. 1996. If It's Controversial, Why Teach It?. Social Education, 60(1), 9--14. https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/publications/se/6001/600101.html.
[14]
Hieronymus Purwanta. 2012. Evaluasi Isi Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah Pada Masa Orde Baru. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXI (3), 424--440. https://doi.org/10.21831/ cp.v0i3.1551.
[15]
Abdul Manaf, Kartowagiran, Harun. 2020. Character and Values of Junior High School Students in the Coastal Area, Indonesia. New Education Review, 60(2), 40--48.
[16]
Sarah Philpott, Clabough, Jeremiah, McConkey, Lance & Turner, Thomas N. 2011. Controversial issues: To teach or not to teach? That is the question!, Georgia Social Studies Journal. 1(1).https://coe.uga.edu/assets/downloads/misc/gssj/S-Philpott-et-al-2011.pdf.
[17]
Singgih Tri Sulistiyono. 2011. Controversy in history education: experiences of Japan and Indonesia. Agastya, 1(2), 133--151.
[18]
Nugroho. 2017. Controversial Issues in Historical Learning: Problem or Challenge?, Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Education Conference (AECON 2017), 22--25.
[19]
Mestika Zeid. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
[20]
Huberman, A.M & Miles, M.B. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Method. Sage Publication.
[21]
Merle Calvin Ricklefs. 2001. Sejarah Indonesia Modern (3nd. ed.). Yogyakarta, Gadjahmada University Press.
[22]
Abdurakhman, Arif Pradono, Linda Sunarti, Susanto Zuhdi. 2018. Sejarah Indonesia untuk SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas XII. Jakarta, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
[23]
Geoffrey Robinson. 2018. The Killing Season. A History of The Indonesian Massacre, 1965--1966. New Jersey. Princeton University Press.
[24]
Bambang Purwanto and Asvi Warman Adam. 2005. Menggugat Historiografi Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Ombak.
[25]
Jenny K. Matitaputty. 2016. Model Pembelajaran Isu-isu Kontroversial Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. SOSIO DIDAKTIKA: Social Science Education Journal, 3(2), 185--192. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/sd.v3i2.4365.
[26]
Abdul Aziz Wahab. 2008. Metode dan Model-Model Mengajar IPS. Bandung, Alfa Betha.
[27]
Rochiati Wiriaatmadja. 2002. Pendidikan Sejarah di Indonesia. Bandung. Historia Utama Press.

Index Terms

  1. Development Concept of Controversial History Material in Senior High School in Indonesia

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICLIQE 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
    September 2020
    868 pages
    ISBN:9781450375726
    DOI:10.1145/3452144
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 April 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Controversial History Material
    2. Development Concept
    3. Senior High School

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICLIQE 2020

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 32
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media