skip to main content
10.1145/3452144.3453738acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ICT Literacy among High School Students Based on E-Learning Effectivity in Surakarta

Published: 25 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Skills for living in the world are 21st century skills based on information, information, and communicate literacy. ICT literacy supports education successfully due to the fact that ICT literacy on education is lower than general ICT usage. E-learning engages ICT tools to increase transfer of knowledge, then e-learning usage is expected to improve ICT literacy especially on education. The purpose of this study is to determine ICT literacy through the assessment of school e-learning effectiveness. The questionnaire consisted of students' ICT literacy tests based on PISA (2012) and the assessment of e-learning effectiveness according to The European Association of Distance Teaching Universities. The results showed students' ICT literacy of high level school is 34.95%, middle level school is 34.95%, and lower level school is 34.95% while the assessment of school e-learning effectiveness is around 43.07%. We determined the impression of the students' ICT literacy with the assessment of school e-learning effectiveness. This study shows that there is an influence between ICT literacy of students towards the assessment of e-learning effectivity at school (sig <0.05). The results of the research have shown that the effectiveness of using e-learning in the learning process needs to be optimized to improve students' ICT literacy.

References

[1]
L. L. Fong, G. K. Sidhu, and C. Y. Fook. 2013. Exploring 21st century skills among postgraduates in Malaysia. Prosedia Social and Behavioral Sciences vol.123, pp.130-138
[2]
J. Kim and W. Lee.2013. Meanings of criteria and norms: Analyses and comparisons of ICT literacy competencies of middle school students. Journal of Computer & Education, vol.64, pp.81-94
[3]
E. van Laar, A. J.A.M. van Deursen, J. A.G.M. van Dijk, J. de Haan. 2017. The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, vol.72, pp.577--588
[4]
F. Siddiq, R. Scherer, and J. Tondeur. 2016. Teachers' emphasis on developing students' digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers & Education, vol.92-93, pp. 1--14.
[5]
T. J. Barrett, A. T. Stull, T. M. Hsu, and M. Hegarty. 2015. Constrained interactivity for relating multiple representations in science: When virtual is better than real. Computers & Education, vol.81, pp.69--81.
[6]
A. Heinze and C. Procter.2004. Reflections On The Use Of Blended Learning. Conference Proceedings of Education. in a Changing Environtment. Manchester: University of Salford ISBN: 0902896806 Retrieved from http://www.edu.salford.ac.uk/her/ (Accessed: 10 July 2020)
[7]
Uwes A C. 2017. PEDATI Model Desain Pembelajaran Blended. Jakarta: Ministry of Research and Technology/National Agency for Research and Innovation
[8]
R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and T. Teo. 2015. Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, vol.88, pp.202--214
[9]
P. Rosman and L. Burita. 2014. Concept of the computer science course and some aspects of ICT integration into education. Journal E&M Economics and Management, vol.17(3), pp. 169--180
[10]
B. Kołodziejczak and M. Roszak.2017. ICT Competencies for Academic E-Learning. Preparing Students for Distance Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, vol.6(3).
[11]
R. A. Rasheed, A. Kamsin and N. A. Abdullah. 2019. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Journal of Computer & Education, vol.144.
[12]
A. Marchalot et all. 2017. Effectiveness of a blended learning course and flipped classroom in first year anaesthesia training. Journal of Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, vol.313, pp.5-9
[13]
C. Dziuban, C. R. Graham, P. D. Moska, A. Norberg, and N. Sicilia. 2018. Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol.15(1), p.3.
[14]
M. Lennon et al. 2003. Feasibility study for the PISA ICT literacy assessment: report to network. OECD Publishing Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504154.pdf (Accessed: 7 Mei 2019)
[15]
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Are students ready for a technology-rich world?, what PISA studies tell us. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/35995145.pdf (Accessed: 7 Mei 2019)
[16]
International ICT Literacy Panel. 2002. Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. ETS Report of the International ICT Literacy Panel Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/ICTREPORT.pdf (Accessed: 3 Mei 2019)
[17]
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511 (Accessed: 7 Mei 2019)
[18]
Ehlers et al. 2006. Quality in e-learning: use and dissemination of quality approaches in European e-learning: a study by the European Quality Observatory. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260423303_Quality_in_e-learning_use_and_dissemination_of_quality_approaches_in_European_e-learning_a_study_by_the_European_Quality_Observatory (Accessed: 3 Mei 2019)
[19]
Ubachs et al. 2007. Quality Assessment for E-learning: a Benchmarking Approach. Maastricht: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities. [E-book] Available: http://e-xcellencelabel.eadtu.eu/tools/manual (Accessed: 3 Mei 2019)
[20]
K. Williams, K. Kear, and J. Rosewell. 2012. Quality Assessment for E-learning: a Benchmarking Approach (2nd). Maastricht: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities. [E-book] Available: http://e-xcellencelabel.eadtu.eu/tools/manual (Accessed: 3 Mei 2019)
[21]
K. Kear et al. 2016. Quality Assessment for E-learning: a Benchmarking Approach (Third edition). Maastricht: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities. [E-book] Available: http://e-xcellencelabel.eadtu.eu/tools/manual (Accessed: 3 Mei 2019)
[22]
J. Perez and M. Coffin Murray. 2010. Generativity: The New Frontier for Information and Communication Technology Literacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management, vol.5, pp.127-137
[23]
S. Loanne and C. Natasha. 1997. The Information Literacy Debate. Jounal Academis Librarianship, vol.23(1), pp.9-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(97)90066-5
[24]
A. J.A.M. van Deursen, E. J. Helsper and R Eynon. 2015. Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society, vol.19(6), pp.804--823
[25]
R. Scherera and J. E. Gustafsson. 2015. Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, vol.88, pp.202--214
[26]
M. Claro, A. Salinas, T. C. Hutt, and E. S. Martin. 2018. Teaching in a Digital Environment (TIDE): Defining and measuring teachers' capacity to develop students' digital information and communication skills. Computers & Education, vol.121
[27]
M. J. Kintu and C. Zhu. 2016. Student Characteristics and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment Intervention in a Ugandan University. Electronic Journal Of E-Learning, vol.14(3), pp.181-195
[28]
D.l D. Felisonia and A. S. Godoib. 2018. Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computer & Education: An International Journal, vol.117, pp.175--187.
[29]
C. K. Lo. 2018. Grounding the flipped classroom approach in the foundations of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.66(3), pp.793-811
[30]
Spector. 2016. Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
[31]
S. I. Freitas, J. Morgan and D. Gibson. 2015. Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in highereducation? Engagement and course retention in onlinelearning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol.46 (3), pp.455--471
[32]
M. Lai, K. M. Lam, and C. P. Lim. (2016). Design principles for the blend in blended learning: a collective case study. Teaching In Higher Education, vol.21(6), pp.716--729.
[33]
S. Zacks and M. Hen. 2018. Academic interventions for academic pro crastination: A review of the literature, Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, vol.46(2), pp.117-130
[34]
M. L. Wilson, A. D. Ritzhaupt, and L. Cheng. 2020. The impact of teacher education courses for technology integration on pre-service teacher knowledge: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education, vol.156.
[35]
E. Er, T. J. Kopcha, and M. Orey. 2015. Exploring college students' online help-seeking behavior in a flipped classroom with a web-based help-seeking too. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol.31(5). pp.537 Available: https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/2527/1310
[36]
M. L. Hung and C. Chou. 2015. Students' perceptions of instructors' roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers & Education, vol.81, pp.315--325.
[37]
M. G. Brown. 2016. Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1--10.
[38]
G. Ignatow and L. Robinson. 2017. Pierre Bourdieu: theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 950--966.
[39]
P. W. C. Prasad, A. Maag, M. Redestowicz, and L. S. Hoe. 2018. Unfamiliar technology: Reaction of international students to blended learning. Computers & Education, 122, 92--103.
[40]
V. Nikoli, D. Petkovi, N. Deni, M. Milovančevi, and S. Gavrilovi. 2018. Appraisal and review of e-learning and ICT systems inteaching process, Physica A.
[41]
M. Ahmad, J. Badusah, A. Z. Mansor, A. A. Karim, F. Khalid, M. Y. Daud, et al. 2016. The application of 21st century ICT literacy model among teacher trainees.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol.15(3), pp.151--161. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1106417
[42]
P. R. Albion, J. Tondeur, A. F. Baruch, and J. Peeraer. 2015. Teachers' professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, vol.20(4), pp.655--673.

Index Terms

  1. ICT Literacy among High School Students Based on E-Learning Effectivity in Surakarta

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICLIQE 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
      September 2020
      868 pages
      ISBN:9781450375726
      DOI:10.1145/3452144
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 25 April 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. 21st Century Skills
      2. E-Learning Effectiveness
      3. ICT Literacy

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ICLIQE 2020

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 49
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media