skip to main content
10.1145/3452144.3453764acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visually Impaireds Critical Thinking Skills (A Comparative Study between Inclusive School and Special School)

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 April 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate the critical thinking skills comparison of visually impaired students in inclusive school and special school. The method used in this study was quantitative method with a comparative type. The data used in this study were collected through observation and oral test. The research subjects were given 15 questions individually. Their responses were observed and matched with the rubric to score on a scale of 1-5 (each question had different rubric). The instrument of this study were validated through expert judgment process. The assessment of each expert was then analyzed using Aikens V formula and gave the results of the item's validity coefficient of 0.92-1 so that all the items developed in this study can be declared as valid items. The reliability testing technique used in this study was an internal consistency through the Alpha formula. The results of calculation process using this foormula show a reliability coefficient of 0.975, so it can be stated that the instrument developed in this study was very reliable. The results obtained in this study indicate that the critical thinking skills scores of visually impaired students in inclusive school were ranged from 44-80, while in special school ranged from 45--53. That data were then analyzed using Mann Whitney U test and gave the results of asymp sig. (2-tailled) value of 0.025. Thus, it can be concluded that there was a significant differences in critical thinking skills between visually impaired students in inclusive school and special school.

References

  1. Agesa, L., Challenges Face by Learners with Visual Impairments in Inclusive Setting in Trans-Nzoia County, Journal of Education and Practice, 5 (29), 185--192, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizikovitsh-Udi, E. & Cheng, D., Developing Critical Thinking Skills from Disposition to Abilities: Mathematics Education from Early Chilhood to High School, Scientific Research Publishing: Creative Education, 6 (1), 455--462, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arslantas, T. K., Foreign Language Education of Visually Impaired Individuals: A Review of Pervasive Study, IHEAD: Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 2 (2), 95--104, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. As'ari, A., Ideas for Developing Critical Thinking at Primary School Level, Presented on International of Addressing Higher Order Thinking: Critical Thinking Issues in Primary EducationUniversity of Muhammadiyah Makasar, Makasar, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayati, S., & Ghordel, S. Z., Relevance of The Mann Whitney Wilcoxon Test in The Survival Analysis of Newly Established Companies in Tunisia (Case of the Sfax Region)Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8 (12), 1--20, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B., Critical Thinking Skill Development: Analysis of A New Learning Management for Thai-High School, Journal of International Studies, 11 (2), 37--48, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Demiral, S., Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills of Visually Impaired Female National Judo Team Athletes, Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7 (3), 8--16, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Desiningrum, D. R., Psikologi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus, Yogyakarta: Psikosain, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Facione, P. A., Critical Thinking: What Is It & Why It Counts, Pearson Education: Insight Assessment, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Friend, M. & Bursuck, W., Menuju Pendidikan Inklusi: Panduan Praktis untuk Mengajar. Terj. Nuriowandari. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E., Improving Junior High Schools Critical Thinking Skill Based on Test Three Different Models of Learning, International Journal of Instruction, 10 (1), 101--116, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hadi, P., Kemandirian Tunanetra, Jakarta: Depdiknas Dirjen Dikti, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Huda, M., Susilo, H., & Sa'dijah, C., Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Penerapan Reciprocal Teaching, Presented on Prosiding Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Kerjasama Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kemendikbud, State University of Malang, Malang, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, E. B., Contextual Teaching and Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar Mengasyikan dan Bermakna, Bandung: Kaifa, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Korir, B. C., Challenges Encountered by Students with Visual Impairment and Teachers in An Integrated School Environment: A Case of Integrated Secondary School in Kericho District, Ainamoi Division, Kenya, International Journal of Education, Learning, and Development, 3 (8), 28--40, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurniawan, I., Implementasi Pendidikan bagi Siswa Tunanetra di Sekolah Dasar inklusi, Edukasi Islami Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4 (1), 144--160, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Liputan 6, Hadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0, Kemendikbud akan Rancang Ulang Kurikulum, https://www.liputan6.com, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Maindi, A. D., Challenges Face by Student with Visual Impairment when Learning Physics on Regular Secondary School, Internnational Journal of Education, Learning, and Development, 6 (9), 38--50, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mardliyah, A. A., Budaya Literasi sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis di Era Industri Revolusi 4.0, Presented on Prosiding SNP2M (Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat) Unim, (1), 171--176, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Meranti, T., Psikologi Anak Hiperaktif, Yogyakarta: Familia, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Morelle, M. & Tabane, R., Challenges Experienced by Learners with visual Impairment in South African Township Mainstream Primary School, South African Journal of Education, 39 (3), 1--6, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Nachar, N., The Mann-Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Sample Come from The Same Distribution, Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4 (1), 13--20, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nahlisa, R. M., Rukiyah, & Christiani, L., Buku Braille sebagai Jembatan Keterbatasan Akses Informasi Siswa Tunanetra Sekolah Luar Biasa Bagian A Driya Adi Semarang, Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 4 (2), 1--8, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Okezone, Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia Mencapai 9 Juta Jiwa, https://www.okezone.com/read/2015/, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rudiyati, S., Pendidikan Anak Tunanetra, Yogyakarta: State University of Yogyakarta, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rukajat, A., Pendekatan Penelitian Kuantitatif: Quantitative Research Approach, Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sriwidadi, T., Penggunaan Mann-Whitney pada Analisis Pengaruh Pelatihan Wiraniaga dalam Penjualan Produk Baru, Jakarta: Binus University, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sunanto, J., Potensi Anak Berkelainan Penglihatan, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Susanto & Nanda, D. S. Teaching and Learning English for Visually Impaired Students: An Ethnographic Case Study, English Review: Journal of English Education, 7 (1), 83--92, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Tanjung, B. S., & Iswari, M., Dukungan Orang Tua terhadap Prestasi Anak Tunanetra di Sekolah Inklusi, Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Kebutuhan Khusus, 7 (2), 1--5, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Triutari, I., Persepsi Mahasiswa Penyandang Disabilitas tentang Sistem Pendidikan Segregasi dan Inklusi (Deskriptif Kuantitatif pada Penyandang Disabilitas di Universitas Negeri Padang), E-Jupekhu (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Khusus) 1 (1), 221--229, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Triwiaty, R. & Assjari, M., Program Literasi Sekolah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Siswa Tunanetra SDLB di SLB Cimahi, Jassi Anakku, 18 (2), 51--56, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Unesco, Education for All (EFA) Global Monitoring Report 2009, Overcoming Inequality: Why Governance Matters, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000177683, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Visually Impaireds Critical Thinking Skills (A Comparative Study between Inclusive School and Special School)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICLIQE 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
      September 2020
      868 pages
      ISBN:9781450375726
      DOI:10.1145/3452144

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader