skip to main content
10.1145/3452940.3453032acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciteeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Classification of Connectives Based on Combination Neural Network

Published: 17 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The overlap rate of connectives between different categories of connectives can be viewed directly from the heat map. Therefore, it is necessary to explore a classification method to minimize ambiguity of connectives. A series of methods for automatic classification of connectives in sentence-level are compared in this paper. A combination method is chosen by which we can predict the categories of connectives in a sentence. In the process of automatic classification of connectives, a supervised machine learning algorithm---K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) was used to classify connectives in order to reduce the ambiguous connectives. However, this method has not gained good effect of automatic classification of connectives. Therefore, authors took another three methods, including Forward Feed Neural Network (FFNN) algorithm, Backward Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) algorithm and a combination method of FFNN&BPNN algorithm. All of these three methods can get better accuracy than the result of KNN algorithm, while the highest accuracy gained by the combination method of FFNN&BPNN among these methods of the experiments. These works can find a maximally disambiguated approach for the classification of connectives that was abstract from Penn Discourse Treebank 3.0 (PDTB3.0).

References

[1]
Liesbeth DEGAND. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Louvain. (1998) On classifying connectives and coherence relations. Digital access to libraries.
[2]
Eleni Miltsakaki, Nikhil Dinesh, Rashmi Prasad, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber(2005). Experiments on Sense Annotations and Sense. Disambiguation of Discourse Connectives.
[3]
Bruno Cartoni, Sandrine Zufferey, Thomas Meyer. (2013) Annotating the meaning of discourse connectives by looking at their Translation: The Translation spotting technique.
[4]
Thomas Meyer and Andrei Popescu-Belis(2012). Using Sense-labeled Discourse Connectives for Statistical Machine Translation.
[5]
Emily Pitler and Ani Nenkova (2009). Using Syntax to Disambiguate Explicit Discourse Connectives in Text.
[6]
Attapol T. Rutherford, Nianwen Xue (2015). Improving the Inference of Implicit Discourse Relations via Classifying Explicit Discourse Connectives.
[7]
Shuichi Ozono, Harumi Ito. Logical connectives as catalysts for interactive L2 reading. System 31 (2003) 283-297.
[8]
Danielle S.McNamara, Arthur C.Graesser, Philip M. McCarthy, Zhiqiang Cai (2014). Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix.
[9]
Rashmi Prasad, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Eleni Miltsakaki, Livio Robaldo, Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber (2008). The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0.
[10]
Deniz Zeyrek1, Am'alia Mendes2, Murathan Kurfali1. Multilingual Extension of PDTB-Style Annotation: The Case of TED Multilingual Discourse Bank. Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Center of Linguistics, University of Lisbon, Lisbon.
[11]
Chloe Braud (2016). University of Copenhagen. Comparing Discourse Annotation Schemes from an NLP Perspective Halliday, M.A.K., Hasan, R., 1976. Cohesion in English. Longman, London.
[12]
Lanjun Zhou, Wei Gao, Binyang Li, Zhong yuWei, Kam-Fai Wong. (2012) Cross-lingual Identification of Ambiguous Discourse Connectives for Resource-Poor Language.
[13]
Rashmi Prasad, Eleni Miltsakaki, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Aravind Joshi. (2007). The Penn Discourse Treebank2.0 Anootation Manual. IRCS Technical Reports Series Institute for Research in Cognitive Science.
[14]
Degand, Liesbeth; Sanders, Ted. (1999) "Causal connectives in language use. Theoretical and methodological aspects of the classification of coherence relations and connectives." Digital access to libraries.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICITEE '20: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technologies and Electrical Engineering
December 2020
687 pages
ISBN:9781450388665
DOI:10.1145/3452940
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 May 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. BPNN
  2. Classification
  3. Combination
  4. Connectives
  5. FFNN

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICITEE2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 12
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media