skip to main content
10.1145/3453187.3453320acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on the Usefulness Ranking of Online Reviews for Experience Goods: A Case Study of Ctrip' s Hotel Review

Published:24 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to meet the special needs about production information of users from different ages and genders for experience goods, an online review usefulness ranking model was proposed to help them make more objective decisions in this paper. By analyzing the characteristics of experience goods, eight indexes of online reviews were selected from the perspective of usefulness of experience goods' reviews, and a personalized usefulness ranking model for experience goods was constructed. Furthermore, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) was used to assign the weight to the corresponding usefulness indexes based on the needs of users from different ages and genders; the usefulness ranking of online reviews for these users was realized by the grey relational degree sorting algorithm; finally, the hotel reviews on the Ctrip website were performed as an example to rank the usefulness of hotel reviews. The results indicated that the top-ranked reviews showed more multidimensional information by using the model promoted in this paper, which makes up for the shortage of ranking based on the review time alone. At the same time, the model in this paper can be used to achieve differentiated ranking based on the information preferences of users, which meets the information needs of users from different categories effectively and provides e-commerce practitioners a new way to rank the usefulness of online reviews.

References

  1. Guoqing G, Kai C, Fei H. An Empirical Study on the Influence of Perceived Credibility of Online Consumer Reviews[J]. Contemporary Economy & Management, 2010, 32(10):17--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dellarocas, Chrysanthos. The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenge of Online Feedback Mechanisms[J]. Management Science, 2011, 49(10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mudambi S M, Schuff D. What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(1):185--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Pan Y, Zhang J Q. Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2011, 87(4):598--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nelson P. Information and Consumer Behavior[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1970(2):311--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Zhang Yanhui, Li Zongwei. Analysis of the Factors that Influence Online Reviews Helpfulness: Based on the Regulating Effect of Product Type. Management Review, 2016, 28(10):123--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xiaozhen C, Jian X, Sizhu W. Research on Filter Model of Customer Review for Sentiment Analysis[J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2014(04):58--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shunli G, Xiangxian Z, Zhongmei L. Study on the Usefulness Ranking Model of Mobile O2O Online Reviews from the Perspective of User's Information Demand: Taking an Example of Meituan[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015, 540(23):87--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yanfeng Z, He L, Qian Z. Research on the Usefulness of Online Review Based on Fuzzy TOPSIS Analysis: A Case Study of Amazon's Mobile Phone Review[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016, 60(13):109--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. NTUSD [EB/OL]. [2020-6-15]. http://www.datatang.com/data/11837.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. DUTIR[EB/OL]. [2020-6-25]. http://ir.dlut.edu.cn/EmotionOntologGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. yDownload.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jun Z J. Comparison of Three Ranking Methods for the Fuzzy Consistent Judgement Matrix [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2003(11):1370--1372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ctrip 2018 Annual Report [EB/OL]. [2020-6-1]. https://ctripcominteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. rnationalltd.gcs-web.com/static-files/2018.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Jie. Research on the Influencing Factors of Consumers' Online Reviews and Their Perceived Usefulness Based on the Perspective of Attribution Theory[D]. Shandong University, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jun Z J. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J]. Fuzzy Systems & Mathematics, 2000, 14(002):80--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jin L Y. Weight calculation method of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J]. Fuzzy Systems & Mathematics, 2002(02):79--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi Xu. The Usefulness of Experiential Product Reviews: A Case Study of Hotels Reviews[D]. Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang Mengying, Deng Sanhong, Wang Hao. Research on the Relationship between Online Reviews and Sales Based on Usefulness of Online Reviews [J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2019, 39(02):154--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Research on the Usefulness Ranking of Online Reviews for Experience Goods: A Case Study of Ctrip' s Hotel Review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EBIMCS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
      December 2020
      718 pages
      ISBN:9781450389099
      DOI:10.1145/3453187

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 March 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EBIMCS '20 Paper Acceptance Rate112of566submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader