skip to main content
10.1145/3453187.3453336acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Evaluation System for the Balance of Information Ecosystem of College Network Education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the research status of college network education and the balance of information ecosystem. Based on analytic hierarchy process, the paper constructs the evaluation system for the balance of information ecosystem of college network education, and elaborates from five aspects: the network education information platform, teachers, students, the interaction between teachers and students, teaching and learning equipment. The paper determines evaluation index weights, and establishes the fuzzy evaluation set of the evaluation system for the balance of information ecosystem of college network education by using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. It concludes that the balance of information ecosystem of college network education is in the middle level. On the basis of the evaluation results, the paper puts forward the corresponding optimization measures, in order to maintain the balance of the college network education industry.

References

  1. Wang H. R. 1997. On the Network Education of University Library Users. J. Shanghai University Library and Information Journal, 2, (1997), 50--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Shu C. D. 1997. Actively Developing Online Education to Meet the Challenge of the Information Age. J. Higher Agricultural Education, 6, (1997), 93--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lou C. Q. and Zhao G. Q. 2006. Information Ecological Balance and Its Role in Building A Harmonious Society. J. Information Science, 11, (2006), 1606--1610.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ma J., Jing J. P., and Zhang X. X. 2010. Research on Information Organization Model of Information Ecosystem. J. Library and Information Service, 10, (2010), 15--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang Y. Z. and Yang M. 2010. Research on The Operation Mechanism of Information Ecosystem Based on The Theory of Five Elements. J. Library and Information Service, 22, (2010), 61--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Shang D. T. 2010. "The Balance of Information Ecology": May or May Not. J. Library and Information Service, 24, (2010), 66--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhao Y. H., Lou C. Q, and Qi F. 2009. The Balancing Mechanism of Information Ecosystem. J. Library and Information Service, 18, (2009), 22--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang C. Y. and LI Q. R. 2001. Several Issues of Information Ecology. J. Economic Forum, 6, (2001), 13--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen S. 1995. Analysis of Information Ecological Imbalance. J. Quarterly Journal of Shandong Library, 4, (1995), 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Li X. L. 2003. On Influencing Factors and Construction Management of Information Ecological Environment. J. Journal of Intelligence, 7, (2003), 94--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Meng R. L. 2006. Maladjustment of Information Ecology and Countermeasures. J. Agricultural Library and Information, 8, (2006), 127-129+146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Y. Q. 2007. Research on Information Ecology and Environment. J. Library Work and Study, 4, (2007), 48--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou Y. 2011. Research on Information Construction in Information Ecosystem. J. Science and Technology Information Development and Economy, 23, (2011), 136--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang Q. L. 2010. Research on Information Ecosystem Model Construction and Its Balance. J. Business Times, 25, (2010), 44--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Xiang P. A. 2017. Multi-functional Value of Rice Cropping and Green Subsidies. M. Central Compilation and Translation Press, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lv Y. Z. and Zhu Y. 2011. Research on The Realization Model of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Service Performance of Public Archives. J. Archives Communication, 6, (2011), 77--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiao F. 2013. Research on Intercultural Competence of International Business Personnel Is Based on The Perspective of Cultural Intelligence. M. Wuhan University Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fu W. D. and Zhou H. Y. 2020. Challenges Brought by COVID-19 Epidemic to China's Online Education and Countermeasures. J. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Education Science edition), 2(2020), 14--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yu S. Q. and Wang H. M. 2020. How to Better Organize Online Learning in Extreme Environments Such As COVID-19. J. China Audio-Visual Education, 5, (2020), 6-14+33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Evaluation System for the Balance of Information Ecosystem of College Network Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EBIMCS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
      December 2020
      718 pages
      ISBN:9781450389099
      DOI:10.1145/3453187

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 March 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EBIMCS '20 Paper Acceptance Rate112of566submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader