skip to main content
10.1145/3453187.3453369acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Structure design and kinematics analysis of lower limb rehabilitation training robot

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this article, a new type of lower limb rehabilitation training robot is designed and related rehabilitation training programs are proposed. The robot system uses a bionic lower limb movement mechanism to drive the hip and ankle joints of the human body, and is combined with a treadmill-type vertical vibration training device to simulate human walking for lower limb rehabilitation training. The overall structure is modeled in three dimensions. In addition, the simplified link mechanism model is used to analyze the robot's motion process by analytical methods, and the motion equations and motion parameters of each component are derived. Meanwhile, simulation software was used to simulate the motion speed of the thigh link and the calf link in the bionic lower limb motion mechanism, and the motion angle range of the hip and knee joints was also simulated. According to the simulation results, the rehabilitation training program is verified and revised to further optimize the design. It lays a theoretical foundation for the movement of the lower limb rehabilitation training robot in the future, and has certain research significance.

References

  1. I. Carvalho, S. M. Pinto, V. C. D.da s, J. L. P.dos Santos, T. Oliveira, L. A. Batista. Robotic gait training for individuals with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2017, 98(11): 2332--2344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. N. Chou, M. L. Chen, Effects of Elastic Band Exercise on Lower Limb Rehabilitation of Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Rehabilitation Nursing, 2019, 44(1):60--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Q. Yin, A. Hu, Q. Li, X. Wei, H. J. Yang, B. H. Wang, G. Q. Zhang, Compound lower limb vibration training rehabilitation robot, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2020, DOI: 10.1002/cpe.6059.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. J. Van Hedel, G. Severini, A. Scarton, A. OBrien, T. Reed, D. Gaebler-Spira, D. Zutter. Advanced Robotic Therapy Integrated Centers (ARTIC): an international collaboration facilitating the application of rehabilitation technologies. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018, 15(1):30--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang, Y. Dong, C. Yang, Y. Geng, Y. Chen, Y. Yang, 5-link model based gait trajectory adaption control strategies of the gait rehabilitation exoskeleton for post-stroke patients, Mechatronics 2010, (20):368--376.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Duan, Y. Sun, W. Cheng, D. Jiang, J. Yun, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, D. Zhou. Gesture recognition based on multi-modal feature weight. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2020, DOI:10.1002/CPE.5991Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Lienhard, J. Vienneau, S. Nigg, O. Meste, S. S. Colson, B. M. NiggRelationship between lower limb muscle activity and platform acceleration during whole-body vibration exercise. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2015, 29(10): 2844--2853.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. T. Yang, X. Gao, R. Gao, F. Dai, J. Peng, A Novel Activity Recognition System for Alternative Control Strategies of a Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(19):3986. 8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. X. Cai, Y. Niu, S. Geng, J. Zhang, Z. Cui, J. Li and J. Chen, An under-sampled software defect prediction method based on hybrid multi-objective cuckoo search, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2020, 32(5):e5478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Y. Sun, J. Tian, D. Jiang, B. Tao, Y. Liu, J. Yun, D. Chen. Numerical simulation of thermal insulation and longevity performance in new lightweight ladle. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2020, DOI:10.1002/CPE.5830Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. Vitiello, T. Lenzi, S. Roccella, S. S. M. M. D. Rossi, E. Cattin, F. Giovacchini, F. Vecchi, M. C. Carrozza, Neuroexos: a powered elbow exoskeleton for physical rehabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2013, 29(1):220--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. G. Nam, J. W. Lee, J. W. Park, H. J. Lee, K. Y. Nam, J. H. Park, B. S. Kwon. Effects of electromechanical exoskeleton-assisted gait training on walking ability of stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2019, 100(1):26--31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Structure design and kinematics analysis of lower limb rehabilitation training robot

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EBIMCS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
      December 2020
      718 pages
      ISBN:9781450389099
      DOI:10.1145/3453187

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 March 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EBIMCS '20 Paper Acceptance Rate112of566submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader