skip to main content
10.1145/3453187.3453416acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Study on Classification of Flue-cured Tobacco Planting area Based on Different Clustering Analysis Methods

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to analyze the quality similarity of tobacco leaves in different tobacco planting areas, 21 quality indices of flue-cured tobacco were collected from different production areas, extracted principal components by factor analysis, classified by 3 clustering analysis methods, and the classification results were compared and statistically tested. The result indicated that: (1) The quality of tobacco leaves was different, and high degree of information overlap was detected among different indices of tobacco appearance, chemical and sensory quality; (2) The cumulative variance contribution rate of 5 extracted principal component factors was 85.445%, and the eigenvalues were 7.761, 4.758, 2.472, 1.674 and 1.278, respectively; (3) The results of 3 cluster analysis methods were not the same. The results of the weighted principal component distance cluster and the weighted principal component cluster were similar, which were different from the general principal component cluster; (4) The results of statistical test showed that the weighted principal component distance cluster method had the largest F-test value (5.900), the smallest sum of squares within the group (8.164), and the largest sum of squares between groups (19.267). And the weighting results for different principal component factors were more reasonable which also had more objective classification results. The cluster results of weighted principal component distance and weighted principal component were better than that of general principal component. And the cluster results of weighted principal component distance were more interpretable which had better the statistical test results.

References

  1. Hu Jianjun. Tobacco leaf quality evaluation optimization and empirical research[D]. Hunan Agricultural University, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gao Lin, Tian Feng, Chen Qianfeng, et al. Evaluation of quality and style characteristics of flue-cured tobacco in Xiangxi Prefecture[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2019 (9): 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang Nan, Luo Xinggang, Zhang Zhongliang, et al. Cigarette formula maintenance based on non-negative matrix factorization[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2019(8): 67--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lv Yanwei, Lou Xianjun, Li Ping. Weighted principal component distance cluster analysis method and its application[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2018 (15): 87--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhu Jianping, Wang Deqing, Fang Kuangnan. Static analysis of China's regional innovation capability------based on the adaptive weighted principal component clustering model[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2013 (5): 761--768.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Junfei, Chen Lin. Environmental quality assessment of Jiangsu Province based on weighted principal component distance clustering[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2018 (10): 1383--1388.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang Deqing, Zhu Jianping, Xie Bangchang. Thinking on validity of principal component cluster analysis[J]. Statistical Research, 2012 (11): 84--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lai Yanhua, Chen Cuiling, Ouyang Lusi, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of cigarette quality stability------based on multi-feature similarity analysis and principal component analysis[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2017 (5): 22--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang Deqing, Zhu Jianping, Wang Jiedan. Research on functional data clustering method based on adaptive weight[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2015 (1): 84--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lv Yanwei, Li Ping. A cluster analysis method based on weighted principal component distance[J]. Statistical Research, 2016 (11): 102--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chu Xu, Wang Keqing, Wei Jianrong, et al. Quality evaluation of flue-cured tobacco leaf based on comprehensive weighting method[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2019 (10): 28--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Zhongsheng, Chen Jingbo, Zhou Xinghua, et al. Application of Fuzzy Evaluation and Euclidean Distance Method in Tobacco Chemical Composition Evaluation[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2012 (11): 33--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cai Xianjie, Wang Xinmin, Yin Qisheng. Preliminary study on quantitative analysis of flue-cured tobacco appearance quality indicators[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2004(6): 37--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Deng Xiaohua, Zhou Jiheng, Chen Xinlian, et al. Research on the correlation between tobacco leaf quality evaluation indicators[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2008 (2): 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Deng Xiaohua, Deng Jingqing, Xiao Chunsheng, et al. The distribution of flavor notes in strong flavor type tobacco leaves from Hunan province[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2014 (2): 39--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng Xiaohua, Yang Lili, Lu Zhongshan, et al. Sensory evaluation of quality, style and characteristics of Xiangxi tobacco leaves[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2013 (5): 22--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chu Xu, Wang Keqing, Wei Jianrong, et al. Study on method combination for evaluation of fertility status of tobacco growing soil in Yunnan[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2019 (2): 48--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhao Qibo, Chen Jingbo, Wei Jianrong, et al. Application of combined evaluation method in comprehensive evaluation of tobacco leaf chemical quality[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2013 (19): 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen Junfei, Wu Mingfeng. Application of Principal Component Analysis in the Evaluation of Urban Complex System Development[J]. Soft Science, 2006 (1): 9--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang Deqing, Liu Xiaowei, Zhu Jianping. Clustering Analysis for Functional Data based on Adaptive Iteration[J]. Statistical Research, 2015 (4): 91--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Hua, Zhao Shuying, Sun Qiubai, et al. Construction and analysis of financial security index evaluation system based on weighted principal component distance clustering[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2018 (1): 90--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Study on Classification of Flue-cured Tobacco Planting area Based on Different Clustering Analysis Methods

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EBIMCS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
      December 2020
      718 pages
      ISBN:9781450389099
      DOI:10.1145/3453187

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 March 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EBIMCS '20 Paper Acceptance Rate112of566submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader