skip to main content
10.1145/3453417.3453434acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrtnsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Timely and Non-Disruptive Response of Emergency Vehicles: A Real-Time Approach

Published:22 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Facilitating timely traversal of emergency response vehicles (ERVs), especially through an urban road network remains a challenging task. ERV preemption is a technique commonly used to facilitate prioritized ERV traversal. Unplanned deployment of ERV preemption can induce network-wide traffic delays. This paper presents an ERV preemption strategy (considering ERV urgency levels) that proactively manages the traffic before, during and after ERV traversal by leveraging connected infrastructure to guarantee timely ERV travel while minimizing traffic delays. We also provide worst-case wait time bounds for non-emergency vehicles during ERV preemption. Our proposed approach does not introduce any additional delay in ERV traversal over existing approaches while also showing up to 43% reduction in average non-emergency traffic delays.

References

  1. National Emergency Number Association. 2020. 9-1-1 Statistics. Retrieved November 27, 2020 from https://www.nena.org/page/911StatisticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Barth and U. Franke. 2010. Tracking oncoming and turning vehicles at intersections. In 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel Brent and Louis-Philippe Beland. 2020. Traffic Congestion, Transportation Policies, and the Performance of First Responders. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wolf-Rüdiger Bretzke. 2013. Global Urbanization: A Major Challenge for Logistics. Logistics Research (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Miaomiao Cao, Qiqi Shuai, and Victor OK Li. 2019. Emergency Vehicle-Centered Traffic Signal Control in Intelligent Transportation Systems. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. National Safety Council. 2018. Emergency Vehicles Crash Statistics. Retrieved November 27, 2020 from https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/road-users/emergency-vehicles/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson D Déziel. 2019. Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department: A Patient-selected Signal of Acuity and Its Effect on Resource Provision. The American journal of emergency medicine(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dario Faggioli, Marko Bertogna, and Fabio Checconi. 2010. Sporadic server revisited. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nasim Farrohknia, Maaret Castrén, Anna Ehrenberg, Lars Lind, Sven Oredsson, Håkan Jonsson, Kjell Asplund, and Katarina E Göransson. 2011. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yiheng Feng, K Larry Head, Shayan Khoshmagham, and Mehdi Zamanipour. 2015. A real-time adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. HCM. 2010. Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hongwei Hsiao, Joonho Chang, and Peter Simeonov. 2018. Preventing emergency vehicle crashes: status and challenges of human factors issues. Human factors (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Subash Humagain and Roopak Sinha. 2020. Dynamic Prioritization of Emergency Vehicles For Self-Organizing Traffic using VTL+ EV. In IECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Krista Jeannotte, Andre Chandra, Vassili Alexiadis, and Alexander Skabardonis. 2004. Traffic analysis toolbox Volume II: Decision support methodology for selecting traffic analysis tools. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Anupam B Jena, N Clay Mann, Leia N Wedlund, and Andrew Olenski. 2017. Delays in emergency care and mortality during major US marathons. New England Journal of Medicine(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wenwen Kang, Gang Xiong, Yisheng Lv, Xisong Dong, Fenghua Zhu, and Qingjie Kong. 2014. Traffic signal coordination for emergency vehicles. In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Borna Kapusta, Mladen MiletiC, Edouard Ivanjko, and Miroslav Vujić. 2017. Preemptive traffic light control based on vehicle tracking and queue lengths. In 2017 International Symposium ELMAR. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yeong-Lin Lai, Yung-Hua Chou, and Li-Chih Chang. 2018. An intelligent IoT emergency vehicle warning system using RFID and Wi-Fi technologies for emergency medical services. Technology and health care(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Masoud and S. Belkasim. 2018. WSN-EVP: A Novel Special Purpose Protocol for Emergency Vehicle Preemption Systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology(2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2784568Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhaolong Ning, Jun Huang, and Xiaojie Wang. 2019. Vehicular fog computing: Enabling real-time traffic management for smart cities. IEEE Wireless Communications(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamed Noori, Liping Fu, and Sajad Shiravi. 2016. A Connected Vehicle Based Traffic Signal Control Strategy for Emergency Vehicle Preemption. In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 2017. Traffic Signal Timing Manual. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/chapter6.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 2019. Signalized intersections: Informational guide. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/04091/07.cfmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pratham Oza 2020. A Coordinated Spillback-Aware Traffic Optimization and Recovery at Multiple Intersections. Technical Report. Virginia Tech. https://www.rtx.ece.vt.edu/resources/Files/oza20-tech.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. P. Oza and T. Chantem. 2019. A Real-Time Server Based Approach for Safe and Timely Intersection Crossings. In 2019 IEEE 25th International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. P. Oza, T. Chantem, and P. Murray-Tuite. 2020. A Coordinated Spillback-Aware Traffic Optimization and Recovery at Multiple Intersections. In 2020 IEEE 26th International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Prahlad D Pant, Yizong Cheng, Arudi Rajagopal, Nagaraju Kashayi, 2005. Field testing and implementation of dilemma zone protection and signal coordination at closely-spaced high-speed intersections. Rep. No. FHWA/OH-2005/006, Ohio Dept. of Transportation, Columbus, OH (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. V. Paruchuri. 2017. Adaptive Preemption of Traffic for Emergency Vehicles. In 2017 UKSim-AMSS 19th International Conference on Computer Modelling Simulation (UKSim).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jin Qin, Yong Ye, Bi-rong Cheng, Xiaobo Zhao, and Linling Ni. 2017. The emergency vehicle routing problem with uncertain demand under sustainability environments. Sustainability (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Morgan Quigley 2009. ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In ICRA workshop on open source software. Kobe, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Chang Qiao Shao and Xiao Ming Liu. 2012. Estimation of Saturation Flow Rates at Signalized Intersections. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society(2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Virginia Legislative Information System. 2020. Code of Virginia: Emergency Vehicles. Retrieved November 27, 2020 from https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title46.2/chapter8/section46.2-829/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. TomTom. 2019. TomTom Traffic Index. https://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/traffic-index/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin Treiber, Ansgar Hennecke, and Dirk Helbing. 2000. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Physical review E (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jiaming Wu, Balázs Kulcsár, Soyoung Ahn, and Xiaobo Qu. 2020. Emergency vehicle lane pre-clearing: From microscopic cooperation to routing decision making. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Xing Wu, Hao Yang, Bipul Mainali, Pratik Pokharel, and Steve Chiu. 2019. Development of platoon-based actuated signal control systems to coordinated intersections: application in corridors in Houston. IET Intelligent Transport Systems(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jiao Yao, Kaimin Zhang, Yuanyuan Yang, and Jin Wang. 2018. Emergency vehicle route oriented signal coordinated control model with two-level programming. Soft Computing (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    RTNS '21: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems
    April 2021
    236 pages
    ISBN:9781450390019
    DOI:10.1145/3453417

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 July 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate119of255submissions,47%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format