skip to main content
research-article

“What Happens to the Raspado man in a Cash-free Society?”: Teaching and Learning Socially Responsible Computing

Published:15 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Computer Science for All movement is bringing CS to K-12 classrooms across the nation. At the same time, new technologies created by computer scientists have been reproducing existing inequities that directly impact today's youth, while being “promoted and perceived as more objective or progressive than the discriminatory systems of a previous era” [1, p. 5–6]. Current efforts are being made to expose students to the social impact and ethics of computing at both the K-12 and university-level—which we refer to as “socially responsible computing” (SRC) in this paper. Yet there is a lack of research describing what such SRC teaching and learning actively involve and look like, particularly in K-12 classrooms. This paper fills this gap with findings from a research-practice partnership, through a qualitative study in an Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles classroom enrolling low-income Latino/a/x students from a large urban community. The findings illustrate 1) details of teaching practice and student learning during discussions about SRC; 2) the impact these SRC experiences have on student engagement with CS; 3) a teacher's reflections on key considerations for effective SRC pedagogy; and 4) why students’ perspectives and agency must be centered through SRC in computing education.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Benjamin Ruha. 2019. Race after Technology. Polity. Medford, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Bender Emily M., Gebru Timnit, McMillan-Major Angelina, and Shmitchell Shmargaret. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT’21), March 3–10, 2021, Virtual Event, Canada. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 14 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Gebru Timnit. 2021. The hierarchy of knowledge in machine learning and related fields and its consequences. Center of Excellence for Minority Women in STEM. Spelman College.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Buolamwini Joy. 2016. How I'm fighting bias in algorithms. TEDxBeaconStreet. Retrieved on October 29, 2020 from https://www.ted.com/talks/joy_buolamwini_how_i_m_fighting_bias_in_algorithms.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] O'Neil Cathy. 2016/17. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Broadway Books. New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Eubanks Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St Martin's Press. New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Noble Safiya. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press. New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Wachter-Boettcher Sara. 2017. Technically Wrong: Sexist Apps, Biased Algorithms, and Other Threats of Toxic Tech. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Broussard Meredith. 2018. Artificial Unintelligence. How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Browne Simone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Kapor Center & ASUCGEST. 2018. Data brief: Women and girls of color in computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Fiesler Casey. 2018. What our tech ethics crisis says about the state of computer science education. Medium: Next Magazine. Retrieved on April 28, 2020 from https://howwegettonext.com/what-our-tech-ethics-crisis-says-about-the-state-of-computer-science-education-a6a5544e1da6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Margolis Jane, Estrella Rachel, Goode Joanna, Holme Jennifer Jellison, and Nao Kimberly. 2008/2017. In Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Exploring Computer Science. Retrieved on October 29, 2020 from http://exploringcs.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Frank Pasquale. 2014. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Fiske John. 1998. Surveilling the city: Whiteness, the Black man and democratic totalitarianism. Theory, Culture and Society 15, 2 (1998), 6788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Lyon David. 2003. Surveillance after September 11. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Banks David A. and Lachney Michael. 2018. Engineered violence: Confronting the problems of neutrality and violence in engineering. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace 5, 1–2 (2018), 112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Nieusma Dean and Blue Ethan. 2012. Engineering and war. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace 1, 1 (2012), 5062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Thompson Clark. 1986. Military direction of academic CS research. Communications of the ACM (July 1986), 29, 7, 583585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Fiesler Casey, Garrett Natalie, and Beard Nathan. 2020. What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. In The 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’20), March 11–14, 2020, Portland, OR, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Vardi Moshe. 2018. Computer professionals for social responsibility. Communications of the ACM, (Jan 2018), 61, 1, 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Miller Keith. 1988. Integrating computer ethics into the computer science curriculum. Computer Science Education 1, 1 (1988), 3752, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0899340880010104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Huff Charles and Diane Martin C.. 1995. Computing consequences: A framework for teaching ethical computing. Communications of the ACM 38, 12, 7584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. [25] Vogel Sara, Santo Rafi, and Ching Dixie. 2017. Visions of computer science education: Unpacking arguments for and projected impacts of CS4All initiatives. SIGCSE Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Santo Rafi, Vogel Sara, and Ching Dixie. 2019. CS for what? Diverse visions of Computer Science Education in Practice. CSforAll, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Scott Kimberly A. and Garcia Patricia. 2017. Techno-social change agents: Fostering activist dispositions among girls of color. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 15, 1 (2017), 6585.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Vakil Sepehr and Higgs Jennifer. 2019. It's about power: A call to rethink ethics and equity in computing education. Communications of the ACM 62, 3 (2019), 3133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Rankin Yolanda, Thomas Jakita O., and Erete Sheena. 2021. Real talk: Saturated sites of violence in CS education. SIGCSE 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432432"> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Vakil Sepehr. 2018. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review 88, 1, 2652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Morales-Doyle Daniel, Vossoughi Shirin, Vakil Sepehr, and Bang Megan. 2020. In an era of pandemic and protest, STEM education can't pretend to be apolitical. Truthout. Retrieved on June 25, 2021 from https://truthout.org/articles/in-an-era-of-pandemic-and-protest-stem-education-cant-pretend-to-be-apolitical/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Kahn Saber. 2017. #ethicalCS: Programming. Medium. Retrieved October 28, 2020 from https://medium.com/@ed_saber/ethicalcs-programming-52d09da1c1cd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Washington Alicia Nicki. 2020. When twice as good isn't enough: The case for cultural competence in computing. SIGCSE 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366792Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Moses Robert and Cobb Charles E.. 2001. Radical Equations: Civil Rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Beacon Press. Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Martin Danny B.. 2003. Hidden assumptions and unaddressed questions in mathematics for all rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator 13, 2, 1721.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Shilton Katie. 2018. Values and ethics in human-computer interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] Ed-Data. 2021. Felicitas and gonzalo mendez high. June 25, 2021 http://www.ed-data.org/school/Los-Angeles/Los-Angeles-Unified/Felicitas-and-Gonzalo-Mendez-High.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Coburn Cynthia E., Penuel William R., and Geil Kimberly E.. 2013. Research-Practice Partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] Tseng Vivian. 2012. Partnerships: Shifting the dynamics between research and practice. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Vygotsky Lev S.. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Abelson Hal, Ledeen Ken, and Lewis Harry. 2008. Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness After the Digital Explosion. Addison-Wesley. Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Cerf Vint. 2002. The internet is for everyone. Retrieved on June 25, 2021 from https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Hammond Zaretta. 2015. Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Center for Humane Technology. 2021. June 25, 2021 https://www.humanetech.com/what-we-do.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] Giroux Henri. 1987. Liberal arts, public philosophy, and the politics of civic courage. JSTOR 17 3, (Autumn, 1987), 331335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. [46] Ryoo Jean J., Estrada Cynthia, Tanksley Tiera, and Margolis Jane. 2019. Connecting computer science education to students’ passions: A critical step toward supporting equity in CS education. University of California, Los Angeles, Center X: Computer Science Equity Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Ryoo Jean J., Tanksley Tiera, Estrada Cynthia, and Margolis Jane. 2020. Take space, make space: How students use computer science to disrupt and resist marginalization in schools. Computer Science Education, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1805284Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Freire Paulo. 1970/1997. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Love Bettina. 2019. We Want to do More than Survive: Abolitionist Teaching and the Pursuit of Educational Freedom. Beacon Press, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Goode Joanna, Ivey Allison, Johnson Stephany RunningHawk, Ryoo Jean J., and Ong Christine. 2020. Rac(e)ing to computer science for all: how teachers talk and learn about equity in professional development. Computer Science Education DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1804772Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Leonard Jacqueline, Brooks Wanda, Barnes-Johnson Joy, and Berry Robert Q.. 2010. The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. Journal of Teacher Education 61, 3 (2010), 261270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Lewis John. 2020. Together, you can redeem the soul of our nation. NY Times Op Ed. (2020). Retrieved October 28, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/opinion/john-lewis-civil-rights-america.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. “What Happens to the Raspado man in a Cash-free Society?”: Teaching and Learning Socially Responsible Computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
      ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 21, Issue 4
      December 2021
      290 pages
      EISSN:1946-6226
      DOI:10.1145/3487991
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2021
      • Accepted: 1 July 2021
      • Revised: 1 June 2021
      • Received: 1 June 2020
      Published in toce Volume 21, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format