Abstract
The Computer Science for All movement is bringing CS to K-12 classrooms across the nation. At the same time, new technologies created by computer scientists have been reproducing existing inequities that directly impact today's youth, while being “promoted and perceived as more objective or progressive than the discriminatory systems of a previous era” [1, p. 5–6]. Current efforts are being made to expose students to the social impact and ethics of computing at both the K-12 and university-level—which we refer to as “socially responsible computing” (SRC) in this paper. Yet there is a lack of research describing what such SRC teaching and learning actively involve and look like, particularly in K-12 classrooms. This paper fills this gap with findings from a research-practice partnership, through a qualitative study in an Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles classroom enrolling low-income Latino/a/x students from a large urban community. The findings illustrate 1) details of teaching practice and student learning during discussions about SRC; 2) the impact these SRC experiences have on student engagement with CS; 3) a teacher's reflections on key considerations for effective SRC pedagogy; and 4) why students’ perspectives and agency must be centered through SRC in computing education.
- [1] . 2019. Race after Technology. Polity. Medford, MA.Google Scholar
- [2] . 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT’21), March 3–10, 2021, Virtual Event, Canada. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 14 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922 Google ScholarCross Ref
- [3] . 2021. The hierarchy of knowledge in machine learning and related fields and its consequences. Center of Excellence for Minority Women in STEM. Spelman College.Google Scholar
- [4] . 2016. How I'm fighting bias in algorithms. TEDxBeaconStreet. Retrieved on October 29, 2020 from https://www.ted.com/talks/joy_buolamwini_how_i_m_fighting_bias_in_algorithms.Google Scholar
- [5] . 2016/17. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Broadway Books. New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [6] . 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St Martin's Press. New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [7] . 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press. New York, NY.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [8] . 2017. Technically Wrong: Sexist Apps, Biased Algorithms, and Other Threats of Toxic Tech. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [9] . 2018. Artificial Unintelligence. How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [10] . 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [11] Kapor Center & ASUCGEST. 2018. Data brief: Women and girls of color in computing.Google Scholar
- [12] . 2018. What our tech ethics crisis says about the state of computer science education. Medium: Next Magazine. Retrieved on April 28, 2020 from https://howwegettonext.com/what-our-tech-ethics-crisis-says-about-the-state-of-computer-science-education-a6a5544e1da6.Google Scholar
- [13] . 2008/2017. In Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [14] Exploring Computer Science. Retrieved on October 29, 2020 from http://exploringcs.org.Google Scholar
- [15] Frank Pasquale. 2014. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [16] . 1998. Surveilling the city: Whiteness, the Black man and democratic totalitarianism. Theory, Culture and Society 15, 2 (1998), 67–88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [17] . 2003. Surveillance after September 11. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- [18] . 2018. Engineered violence: Confronting the problems of neutrality and violence in engineering. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace 5, 1–2 (2018), 1–12.Google Scholar
- [19] . 2012. Engineering and war. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace 1, 1 (2012), 50–62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [20] . 1986. Military direction of academic CS research. Communications of the ACM (July 1986), 29, 7, 583–585. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [21] . 2020. What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis. In The 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’20), March 11–14, 2020, Portland, OR, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825 Google ScholarDigital Library
- [22] . 2018. Computer professionals for social responsibility. Communications of the ACM, (Jan 2018), 61, 1, 9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [23] . 1988. Integrating computer ethics into the computer science curriculum. Computer Science Education 1, 1 (1988), 37–52,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0899340880010104Google ScholarCross Ref - [24] . 1995. Computing consequences: A framework for teaching ethical computing. Communications of the ACM 38, 12, 75–84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [25] . 2017. Visions of computer science education: Unpacking arguments for and projected impacts of CS4All initiatives. SIGCSE Conference. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [26] . 2019. CS for what? Diverse visions of Computer Science Education in Practice. CSforAll, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- [27] . 2017. Techno-social change agents: Fostering activist dispositions among girls of color. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 15, 1 (2017), 65–85.Google Scholar
- [28] . 2019. It's about power: A call to rethink ethics and equity in computing education. Communications of the ACM 62, 3 (2019), 31–33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [29] . 2021. Real talk: Saturated sites of violence in CS education. SIGCSE 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432432"> Google ScholarDigital Library
- [30] . 2018. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review 88, 1, 26–52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [31] . 2020. In an era of pandemic and protest, STEM education can't pretend to be apolitical. Truthout. Retrieved on June 25, 2021 from https://truthout.org/articles/in-an-era-of-pandemic-and-protest-stem-education-cant-pretend-to-be-apolitical/.Google Scholar
- [32] . 2017. #ethicalCS: Programming. Medium. Retrieved October 28, 2020 from https://medium.com/@ed_saber/ethicalcs-programming-52d09da1c1cd.Google Scholar
- [33] . 2020. When twice as good isn't enough: The case for cultural competence in computing. SIGCSE 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366792Google ScholarCross Ref
- [34] . 2001. Radical Equations: Civil Rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Beacon Press. Boston.Google Scholar
- [35] . 2003. Hidden assumptions and unaddressed questions in mathematics for all rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator 13, 2, 17–21.Google Scholar
- [36] . 2018. Values and ethics in human-computer interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073 Google ScholarCross Ref
- [37] Ed-Data. 2021. Felicitas and gonzalo mendez high. June 25, 2021 http://www.ed-data.org/school/Los-Angeles/Los-Angeles-Unified/Felicitas-and-Gonzalo-Mendez-High.Google Scholar
- [38] . 2013. Research-Practice Partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- [39] . 2012. Partnerships: Shifting the dynamics between research and practice. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- [40] . 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- [41] . 2008. Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness After the Digital Explosion. Addison-Wesley. Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [42] . 2002. The internet is for everyone. Retrieved on June 25, 2021 from https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [43] . 2015. Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- [44] Center for Humane Technology. 2021. June 25, 2021 https://www.humanetech.com/what-we-do.Google Scholar
- [45] . 1987. Liberal arts, public philosophy, and the politics of civic courage. JSTOR 17 3, (Autumn, 1987), 331–335.Google Scholar
- [46] . 2019. Connecting computer science education to students’ passions: A critical step toward supporting equity in CS education. University of California, Los Angeles, Center X: Computer Science Equity Project.Google Scholar
- [47] . 2020. Take space, make space: How students use computer science to disrupt and resist marginalization in schools. Computer Science Education,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1805284Google ScholarCross Ref - [48] . 1970/1997. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury, NY.Google Scholar
- [49] . 2019. We Want to do More than Survive: Abolitionist Teaching and the Pursuit of Educational Freedom. Beacon Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- [50] . 2020. Rac(e)ing to computer science for all: how teachers talk and learn about equity in professional development. Computer Science Education DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1804772Google Scholar
- [51] . 2010. The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. Journal of Teacher Education 61, 3 (2010), 261–270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [52] . 2020. Together, you can redeem the soul of our nation. NY Times Op Ed. (2020). Retrieved October 28, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/opinion/john-lewis-civil-rights-america.html.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- “What Happens to the Raspado man in a Cash-free Society?”: Teaching and Learning Socially Responsible Computing
Recommendations
Learning with Leadership: Perspectives from a Statewide Research-Practice Partnership Focused on Equity-Oriented Computing Professional Development for K-12 Administrators
SIGCSE '21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationWhile the Computer Science for All (CS for All) movement has led to valuable advancements in equity-oriented curricula and teacher professional development, critical questions remain about how to build the capacity of school and district leadership to ...
How a Research-Practice Partnership Refined its Strategy for Integrating CS/CT into K-5 Curricula: An Experience Report
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1Massachusetts defined K-12 Digital Literacy/Computer Science (DLCS) standards in 2016 and developed a 5-12 teacher licensure process, expecting K-4 teachers to be capable of teaching to the standards under their elementary license. An NSF CSforAll ...
Evolution of an Integrated, Elementary CSforAll Curriculum
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2A research-practice partnership (RPP) used a teacher co-design process, supported by equity-focused professional development, to create an elementary-level curriculum that integrates content, practices, and learning progressions from state computing ...
Comments