Ana Mandeljc
ABSTRACT
This article presents a conceptual design of a post-stroke rehabilitation device, which is aimed for training the coupled movement of wrist and fingers from flexion to extension in three modalities – passive, active-assisted and active mode of operation. In this article, we describe the configuration, actuation and control system of the robotic device and provide the results of the mechanism’s mock-up evaluation, therapists’ feedback on the design, future work and development plans.
- Serdar Ates, Claudia JW Haarman, and Arno HA Stienen. 2017. SCRIPT passive orthosis: design of interactive hand and wrist exoskeleton for rehabilitation at home after stroke. Autonomous Robots 41, 3 (2017), 711–723.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Susan Barreca, Steven L Wolf, Susan Fasoli, and Richard Bohannon. 2003. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 17, 4 (2003), 220–226.Google Scholar
- Angelo Basteris, Sharon M Nijenhuis, Arno HA Stienen, Jaap H Buurke, Gerdienke B Prange, and Farshid Amirabdollahian. 2014. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 11, 1(2014), 1–15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roslyn N Boyd and Louise Ada. 2001. Physiotherapy management of spasticity. Upper motor neurone syndrome and spasticity: clinical management and neurophysiology (2001), 79–81.Google Scholar
- Jacob Brackenridge, Lynley V Bradnam, Sheila Lennon, John J Costi, and David A Hobbs. 2016. A review of rehabilitation devices to promote upper limb function following stroke. Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (Discontinued) 4, 1(2016), 25–42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Flavia Coroian, Claire Jourdan, Karima Bakhti, Claire Palayer, Audrey Jaussent, Marie-Christine Picot, Denis Mottet, Marc Julia, Huey-Yune Bonnin, and Isabelle Laffont. 2018. Upper limb isokinetic strengthening versus passive mobilization in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 99, 2(2018), 321–328.Google Scholar
- Elena Dantes, Silviu Docu Axelerad, Alina Zorina Stroe, Daniel Docu Axelerad, and Any Docu Axelerad. 2020. The Rehabilitation Of Hemiparesis After Stroke.Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education & Sport/Science, Movement & Health 20, 1 (2020).Google Scholar
- Ludovic Dovat, Olivier Lambercy, Roger Gassert, Thomas Maeder, Ted Milner, Teo Chee Leong, and Etienne Burdet. 2008. HandCARE: a cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 16, 6(2008), 582–591.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henk T Hendricks, Jacques Van Limbeek, Alexander C Geurts, and Machiel J Zwarts. 2002. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 83, 11(2002), 1629–1637.Google Scholar
- Stefan Hesse, Gotthard Schulte-Tigges, Matthias Konrad, Anita Bardeleben, and Cordula Werner. 2003. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 84, 6(2003), 915–920.Google Scholar
- Stefan Hesse, C Werner, M Pohl, S Rueckriem, Jan Mehrholz, and ML Lingnau. 2005. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Stroke 36, 9 (2005), 1960–1966.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yu-wei Hsieh, Ching-yi Wu, Keh-chung Lin, Grace Yao, Kuen-yuh Wu, and Ya-ju Chang. 2012. Dose–response relationship of robot-assisted stroke motor rehabilitation: the impact of initial motor status. Stroke 43, 10 (2012), 2729–2734.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henrik S. Jørgensen, Hirofumi Nakayama, Hans O. Raaschou, Jørgen Vive-Larsen, Mogens Støier, and Tom S. Olsen. 1995. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 76, 5(1995), 406–412.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H Igo Krebs, Neville Hogan, Mindy L Aisen, and Bruce T Volpe. 1998. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering 6, 1(1998), 75–87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chih-Lin Kuo and Gwo-Chi Hu. 2018. Post-stroke spasticity: a review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatments. International Journal of Gerontology 12, 4 (2018), 280–284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Olivier Lambercy, Ludovic Dovat, Roger Gassert, Etienne Burdet, Chee Leong Teo, and Theodore Milner. 2007. A haptic knob for rehabilitation of hand function. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 15, 3(2007), 356–366.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Langhorne, Fiona Coupar, and Alex Pollock. 2009. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. The Lancet Neurology 8, 8 (2009), 741–754.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sheng Li. 2017. Spasticity, motor recovery, and neural plasticity after stroke. Frontiers in neurology 8(2017), 120.Google Scholar
- Lorin P Maletsky, Junyi Sun, and Nicholas A Morton. 2007. Accuracy of an optical active-marker system to track the relative motion of rigid bodies. Journal of biomechanics 40, 3 (2007), 682–685.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qiaoling Meng, Qiaolian Xie, and Hongliu Yu. 2018. Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot: State of the Art and Existing Problems. In Proceedings of the 12th International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology. 155–158.Google Scholar
- Arve Opheim, Anna Danielsson, Margit Alt Murphy, Hanna C Persson, and Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen. 2014. Upper-limb spasticity during the first year after stroke: stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 93, 10(2014), 884–896.Google Scholar
- L Oujamaa, I Relave, J Froger, D Mottet, and J-Y Pelissier. 2009. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine 52, 3 (2009), 269–293.Google ScholarCross Ref
- GB Prange, MJA Jannink, CGM Groothuis-Oudshoorn, HJ Hermens, and MJ Ijzerman. 2009. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 43, 2(2009), 171–184.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mary Vining Radomski and Catherine A Trombly Latham. 1995. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
- Judith D Schaechter. 2004. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Progress in neurobiology 73, 1 (2004), 61–72.Google Scholar
- G Sheean. 2002. The pathophysiology of spasticity. European journal of neurology 9 (2002), 3–9.Google Scholar
- Cathy M Stinear, Catherine E Lang, Steven Zeiler, and Winston D Byblow. 2020. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology 19, 4 (2020), 348–360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- PC Stroke. 2017. Robotic devices and brain–machine interfaces for hand rehabilitation post-stroke. J Rehabil Med 49(2017), 449–460.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johanna H Van Der Lee, Ingrid AK Snels, Heleen Beckerman, Gustaaf J Lankhorst, Robert C Wagenaar, and Lex M Bouter. 2001. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clinical rehabilitation 15, 1 (2001), 20–31.Google Scholar
- Bruce T Volpe, Mark Ferraro, Hermano I Krebs, and Neville Hogan. 2002. Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke. Current atherosclerosis reports 4, 4 (2002), 270–276.Google Scholar
- Jörg Wissel, Aubrey Manack, and Michael Brainin. 2013. Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity. Neurology 80, 3 Supplement 2 (2013), S13–S19.Google Scholar
- Hartwig Woldag and Horst Hummelsheim. 2002. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients. Journal of neurology 249, 5 (2002), 518–528.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kexin Xing, Qi Xu, Jiping He, Yongji Wang, Zhongwei Liu, and Xiaolin Huang. 2008. A wearable device for repetitive hand therapy. In 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE, 919–923.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huangling Zeng, Jian Chen, Yang Guo, and Sheng Tan. 2021. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Spasticity After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Neurology 11 (2021), 1884.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard D Zorowitz, Patrick J Gillard, and Michael Brainin. 2013. Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers. Neurology 80, 3 Supplement 2 (2013), S45–S52.Google Scholar
Recommendations
SCRIPT passive orthosis: design of interactive hand and wrist exoskeleton for rehabilitation at home after stroke
Recovery of functional hand movements after stroke is directly linked to rehabilitation duration and intensity. Continued therapy at home has the potential to increase both. For many patients this requires a device that helps them overcome the ...
A simulation-based framework with a proprioceptive musculoskeletal model for evaluating the rehabilitation exoskeleton system
Highlights- A simulation-based method with a proprioceptive musculoskeletal model was established to evaluate the rehabilitation exoskeleton.
Abstract Background and objectiveVarious rehabilitation exoskeletons have been designed to help people regain normal gait from stroke effects. However, the evaluation and further optimization of these exoskeletons are not convenient ...
Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot: State of the Art and Existing Problems
i-CREATe 2018: Proceedings of the 12th International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive TechnologyThere are about 10 million strokes and 2 million new stroke cases each year in China, of which the rate of death or disability is higher than 75%. The upper limb rehabilitation robot can provide continuous, effective and multimodal rehabilitation ...
Comments