skip to main content
research-article

Sliding-Window QPS (SW-QPS): A Perfect Parallel Iterative Switching Algorithm for Input-Queued Switches

Published: 05 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In this work, we first propose a parallel batch switching algorithm called Small-Batch Queue-Proportional Sampling (SB-QPS). Compared to other batch switching algorithms, SB-QPS significantly reduces the batch size without sacrificing the throughput performance and hence has much lower delay when traffic load is light to moderate. It also achieves the lowest possible time complexity of O(1) per matching computation per port, via parallelization. We then propose another algorithm called Sliding-Window QPS (SW-QPS). SW-QPS retains and enhances all benefits of SB-QPS, and reduces the batching delay to zero via a novel switching framework called sliding-window switching. In addition, SW-QPS computes matchings of much higher qualities, as measured by the resulting throughput and delay performances, than QPS-1, the state-of-the-art regular switching algorithm that builds upon the same underlying bipartite matching algorithm.

References

[1]
G. Aggarwal, R. Motwani, D. Shah, and A. Zhu. Switch scheduling via randomized edge coloring. In Proc. of the IEEE FOCS, pages 502--512, Oct 2003.
[2]
M. Bayati, B. Prabhakar, D. Shah, and M. Sharma. Iterative scheduling algorithms. In Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM, pages 445--453, May 2007.
[3]
C. Cakir, R. Ho, J. Lexau, and K. Mai. Scalable high-radix modular crossbar switches. In Proc. of the HOTI, pages 37--44, Aug 2016.
[4]
R. Duan and H. Su. A scaling algorithm for maximum weight matching in bipartite graphs. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM SODA, pages 1413--1424, 2012.
[5]
M. Fayyazi, D. Kaeli, and W. Meleis. Parallel maximum weight bipartite matching algorithms for scheduling in input-queued switches. In Proc. of the IEEE IPDPS, pages 4--11, Apr. 2004.
[6]
J. Flegal, G. Jones, et al. Batch means and spectral variance estimators in markov chain monte carlo. Ann. Stat., 38(2):1034--1070, 2010.
[7]
P. Giaccone, B. Prabhakar, and D. Shah. Randomized scheduling algorithms for high-aggregate bandwidth switches. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 21(4):546--559, 2003.
[8]
P. Glynn, W. Whitt, et al. The asymptotic validity of sequential stopping rules for stochastic simulations. Ann. Appl. Probab., 2(1):180--198, 1992.
[9]
L. Gong, P. Tune, L. Liu, S. Yang, and J. Xu. Queue-proportional sampling: A better approach to crossbar scheduling for input-queued switches. Proc. of the ACM SIGMETRICS, 1(1):3:1--3:33, June 2017.
[10]
L. Gong, J. Xu, L. Liu, and S. T. Maguluri. QPS-r: A cost-effective crossbar scheduling algorithm and its stability and delay analysis. In Proc. of the EAI VALUETOOLS, 2020.
[11]
B. Hu, F. Fan, K. L. Yeung, and S. Jamin. Highest rank first: A new class of single-iteration scheduling algorithms for input-queued switches. IEEE Access, 6:11046--11062, 2018.
[12]
B. Hu, K. L. Yeung, Q. Zhou, and C. He. On iterative scheduling for input-queued switches with a speedup of 2 ? 1/n. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 24(6):3565--3577, December 2016.
[13]
N. McKeown. The iSLIP scheduling algorithm for input-queued switches. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 7(2):188--201, Apr. 1999.
[14]
N. McKeown, A. Mekkittikul, V. Anantharam, and J. Walrand. Achieving 100% throughput in an input-queued switch. IEEE Trans. Commun., 47(8):1260--1267, Aug. 1999.
[15]
J. Meng, L. Gong, and J. Xu. Sliding-window QPS (SW-QPS): A perfect parallel iterative switching algorithm for input-queued switches, e-prints arXiv:2010.08620, Oct. 2020.
[16]
M. J. Neely, E. Modiano, and Y. S. Cheng. Logarithmic delay for n - n packet switches under the crossbar constraint. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 15(3):657--668, June 2007.
[17]
D. Shah and D. Wischik. Optimal scheduling algorithms for input-queued switches. In Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1--11, Apr. 2006.
[18]
L. Wang, T. Ye, T. Lee, and W. Hu. A parallel complex coloring algorithm for scheduling of input-queued switches. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 29(7):1456--1468, 2018.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 48, Issue 3
December 2020
140 pages
ISSN:0163-5999
DOI:10.1145/3453953
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 March 2021
Published in SIGMETRICS Volume 48, Issue 3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. bipartite matching
  2. input-queued switch
  3. switching

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 35
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media