Jingchun Chen
ABSTRACT
There is an increasingly application of peer assessment (PA) in blended learning environments to motivate and evaluate learners. In spite of its popularity, there are few studies to be conducted to analyze and corroborate its impact on students’ learning in this context. This study aims to evaluate effectiveness of peer assessment in blended learning settings, investigating what effects contribute to learning and teaching. The results suggest that peer assessment in blended learning context creates positive learning outcomes and more interesting attitudes for students. The findings as well as the implications for practice and research are discussed.
- Topping. (2017). Peer Assessment : Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1). doi:10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.1.1.007Google Scholar
- Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., L. Kornhaber, M., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & K. Suen, H. (2015). Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 245-264. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.999746Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gielen, S., (2011). Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts Studies in Higher Education, (6).Google Scholar
- Chorfi H, J. M. P. (2004). Towards an adaptive e-Learning system. Journal of interactive learning research. 15(4), 433-447.Google Scholar
- French D, e. a. (2003). Blended learning: an ongoing process for internet integration. e-Linkages.Google Scholar
- Little John A, e. a. (2007). Preparing for blended e-Learning Routledge. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juwah, C. (2006). Interactions in online education implications for theory and practice, Routledge,2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hou, S., (2007). An Analysis of Peer Assessment Online Discussions within a Course that uses Project-based Learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(3), 237-251. doi:10.1080/10494820701206974.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brookhart, S. M. (1999). The Art and Science of Classroom Assessment. The Missing Part.Google Scholar
- Woo, Y. R., T. C. . (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15-25. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class ELT Journal, (1).Google Scholar
- Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, L., (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dippold, D. (2009). Peer Feedback Through Blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. Recall, 21, 18-36. doi:10.1017/s095834400900010x. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching-Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.Google Scholar
- Chen, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105-117. doi:10.1080/14703290802646297.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cheng, M. C. (2007). Improving interaction and feedback with computer mediated communication in Asian EFL composition classes: A case study. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 4(1).Google Scholar
- Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365-397. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lu, J., & Law, N. (2011). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, K., & Hill, J (2019). Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 383–397. doi:10.1080/07294360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Taiwan college students’ self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 164-169. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.01.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Serrano, D. R. e. a. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273-286. doi:10.1111/ejed.12330.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68(2), 155-168. doi:10.1093/elt/cct068.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shih, R.-C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing_ Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 5), 829-845.Google Scholar
- Kim, S. (2019). Japanese student writers’ perspectives on anonymous peer review. ELT Journal, 73(3), 296-305. doi:10.1093/elt/ccy061.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2019). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-211. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching-Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.Google Scholar
- Topping. (1998). Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68 (3), 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Topping. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 6.Google Scholar
- Zheng, L., Zhang, X., & Cui, P. (2019). The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies: a meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 372-386. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1644603Google ScholarCross Ref
- The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in EFL Blended Learning Environments
Recommendations
A peer assessment approach to project based blended learning course in a Vietnamese higher education
This article presents a model using peer assessment to evaluate students taking part in blended - learning courses (BL). In these courses, teaching activities are carried out in the form of traditional face-to-face (F2F) and learning activities are ...
The Effect of Peer Assessment Rubrics on Learners' Satisfaction and Performance Within a Blended MOOC Environment
CSEDU 2015: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have a remarkable ability to expand access to a large scale of
participants worldwide, beyond the formality of the higher education systems. MOOCs support participants
to be actively involved in collaborative learning ...
Students' experience of peer-interaction in a blended learning course at a South African higher education institution
An investigation of students' experiences of peer-interaction in a blended eLearning course was conducted. In order to understand, evaluate and improve student experience of peer interactions, four learning facilitators revised the course, to align with ...
Comments