Jackie London
ABSTRACT
In this research I seek to understand the efficacy of Twitter as a platform for serial transmission of a crisis communications. As members of the public adopt social media, these platforms are seen as an increasingly strategic channel through which crisis communications can be transmitted. However, there is insufficient understanding of the extent to which these platforms and their users effectively amplify and spread crisis-relevant information during a crisis. I explore these issues in the context of US state health departments and their efforts to inform the public of developments during the COVID-19 pandemic. To do this, I analyze the profiles of the official Twitter account for all 50 state health departments and seek to classify them according to their social presence on social media. Then, I analyze the COVID-19 tweets these health departments sent during the pandemic to better understand how their social media presence and the nature of their messages (tweets, words, URLs, mentions per 7 day) affect the total number of twitter users exposed to each message. My results suggest that systematic differences do exist in the social media presence for state health departments. These differences, as well as the characteristics of the tweets they sent during the pandemic help explain the total number of people exposed to their messages such that short, frequent messages with URLs from departments with high social presence reaching the largest number of users per week. These findings have implications for those responsible for communicating with the public during a crisis and for researchers seeking a better understanding of the flow of crisis communications on social media.
- Arkes, H.R., Hackett, C. and Boehm, L. 1989. The Generality of the Relation between Familiarity and Judged Validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2, 2 (Apr. 1989), 81--94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020203.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Austin, L., Fisher Liu, B. and Jin, Y. 2012. How Audiences Seek Out Crisis Information: Exploring the Social-Mediated Crisis Communication Model. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 40, 2 (May 2012), 188--207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.654498.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bates, D., Sarkar, D., Bates, M.D. and Matrix, L. 2007. The lme4 package. R package version. 2, 1 (2007), 74.Google Scholar
- Bean, H., Sutton, J., Liu, B.F., Madden, S., Wood, M.M. and Mileti, D.S. 2015. The Study of Mobile Public Warning Messages: A Research Review and Agenda. Review of Communication. 15, 1 (Jan. 2015), 60--80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2015.1014402.Google Scholar
- Bell, A. and Jones, K. 2015. Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data*. Political Science Research and Methods. 3, 1 (Jan. 2015), 133--153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, Q., Min, C., Zhang, W., Wang, G., Ma, X. and Evans, R. 2020. Unpacking the black box: How to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis. Computers in Human Behavior. 110, (Sep. 2020), 106380. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380.Google Scholar
- Constant, D., Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. 1994. What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing. Information Systems Research. 5, 4 (1994), 400--421. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eriksson, M. and Olsson, E. 2016. Facebook and Twitter in Crisis Communication: A Comparative Study of Crisis Communication Professionals and Citizens. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management. 24, 4 (Dec. 2016), 198--208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468--5973.12116.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K. and Freberg, L.A. 2011. Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review. 37, 1 (Mar. 2011), 90--92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. 2004. Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega. 32, 6 (Dec. 2004), 407--424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006.Google Scholar
- Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.Google Scholar
- Helson, R., Jones, C. and Kwan, V.S.Y. 2002. Personality change over 40 years of adulthood: Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of two longitudinal samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83, 3 (Sep. 2002), 752--766. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.83.3.752.Google ScholarCross Ref
- HOPKINS, D.J. 2012. WHOSE ECONOMY? PERCEPTIONS OF NATIONAL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE DURING UNEQUAL GROWTH. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 76, 1 (2012), 50--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Javadi, S., Hashemy, S.M., Mohammadi, K., Howard, K.W.F. and Neshat, A. 2017. Classification of aquifer vulnerability using K-means cluster analysis. Journal of Hydrology. 549, (Jun. 2017), 27--37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.060.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jin, Y., Liu, B.F. and Austin, L.L. 2014. Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics' Crisis Responses. Communication Research. 41, 1 (Feb. 2014), 74--94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423918.Google Scholar
- Karahanna, E., Sean Xin Xu, Yan Xu and Zhang, N. (Andy) 2018. The Needs--Affordances--Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media. MIS Quarterly. 42, 3 (Sep. 2018), 737--756. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/11492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karampela, M., Lacka, E. and McLean, G. 2020. "Just be there"?: Social media presence, interactivity, and responsiveness, and their impact on B2B relationships. European Journal of Marketing. 54, 6 (May 2020), 1281--1303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03--2019-0231.Google Scholar
- Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen 2010. Pass it on?: Retweeting in mass emergency. ISCRAM 2010 -- 7th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management: Defining Crisis Management 3.0, Proceedings (Seattle, WA, 2010).Google Scholar
- Kodinariya, T. and Makwana, P. 2013. Review on Determining of Cluster in K-means Clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies. 1, (Jan. 2013), 90--95.Google Scholar
- Nijkrake, J., Gosselt, J.F. and Gutteling, J.M. 2015. Competing frames and tone in corporate communication versus media coverage during a crisis. Public Relations Review. 41, 1 (Mar. 2015), 80--88. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ou, C.X., Pavlou, P.A. and Davison, R.M. 2014. Swift Guanxi in Online Marketplaces: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication Technologies. MIS Quarterly. 38, 1 (2014), 209--230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/26554875. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Palen, L. and Shklovski, I. 2008. Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. Proceedings of the 5th International ?. (May 2008).Google Scholar
- Punj, G. and Stewart, D.W. 1983. Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application. Journal of Marketing Research. 20, 2 (1983), 134--148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3151680.Google Scholar
- Rice, R.E. 1993. Media Appropriateness. Human Communication Research. 19, 4 (1993), 451--484. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468--2958.1993.tb00309.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schultz, F., Utz, S. and Göritz, A. 2011. Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review. 37, 1 (Mar. 2011), 20--27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shi, Z., Rui, H. and Whinston, A.B. 2014. Content Sharing in a Social Broadcasting Environment: Evidence from Twitter. MIS Quarterly. 38, 1 (Mar. 2014), 123-A6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, B.G. and Gallicano, T.D. 2015. Terms of engagement: Analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior. 53, (Dec. 2015), 82--90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.060. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Snacken, R., Kendal, A.P., Haaheim, L.R. and Wood, J.M. 1999. The next influenza pandemic: lessons from Hong Kong, 1997. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 5, 2 (1999), 195--203.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephens, K.K., Barrett, A.K. and Mahometa, M.J. 2013. Organizational Communication in Emergencies: Using Multiple Channels and Sources to Combat Noise and Capture Attention. Human Communication Research. 39, 2 (Apr. 2013), 230--251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sun, H. 2012. Understanding User Revisions When Using Information System Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers. MIS Quarterly. 36, 2 (Jun. 2012), 453--478. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutton, J., Gibson, C.B., Spiro, E.S., League, C., Fitzhugh, S.M. and Butts, C.T. 2015. What it Takes to Get Passed On: Message Content, Style, and Structure as Predictors of Retransmission in the Boston Marathon Bombing Response. PLOS ONE. 10, 8 (Aug. 2015), e0134452. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sutton, J., Spiro, E.S., Johnson, B., Fitzhugh, S., Gibson, B. and Butts, C.T. 2014. Warning tweets: serial transmission of messages during the warning phase of a disaster event. Information, Communication & Society. 17, 6 (Jul. 2014), 765--787. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.862561.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Utz, S., Schultz, F. and Glocka, S. 2013. Crisis communication online: How medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Public Relations Review. 39, 1 (Mar. 2013), 40--46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vieweg, S., Hughes, A.L., Starbird, K. and Palen, L. 2010. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2010), 1079--1088. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vos, S.C. and Buckner, M.M. 2016. Social Media Messages in an Emerging Health Crisis: Tweeting Bird Flu. Journal of Health Communication. 21, 3 (Mar. 2016), 301--308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1064495.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, X. and Cheng, Z. 2020. Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest. 158, 1, Supplement (Jul. 2020), S65--S71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012.Google Scholar
- Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. 2005. Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly. 29, 1 (2005), 35--57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weeks, B.E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A. and Gil de Zúñiga, H. 2017. Online Influence? Social Media Use, Opinion Leadership, and Political Persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 29, 2 (Jun. 2017), 214--239. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv050.Google Scholar
- Wittekind, A., Raeder, S. and Grote, G. 2010. A longitudinal study of determinants of perceived employability. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 31, 4 (2010), 566--586. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.646.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhang, C., Fan, C., Yao, W., Hu, X. and Mostafavi, A. 2019. Social media for intelligent public information and warning in disasters: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Information Management. 49, (Dec. 2019), 190--207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.004.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Tweeting the Alarm: Exploring the Efficacy of Twitter as a Serial Transmitter during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Recommendations
Are Mutated Misinformation More Contagious? A Case Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
WebSci '22: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022The spread of online misinformation has become a major global risk. Understanding how misinformation propagates on social media is vital. While prior studies suggest that the content factors, such as emotion and topic in texts, are closely related to the ...
Tips, Tidings, and Tech: Governmental Communication on Facebook During the COVID-19 Pandemic
dg.o 2022: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchThe COVID-19 pandemic led governments to rely on the versatility of social media to communicate with their citizens. This paper analyzes the Facebook communication of political leaders and health departments from 17 countries during the COVID-19 ...
Regret, Delete, (Do Not) Repeat: An Analysis of Self-Cleaning Practices on Twitter After the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDuring the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, many people shared their symptoms across Online Social Networks (OSNs) like Twitter, hoping for others’ advice or moral support. Prior studies have shown that those who disclose health-related information ...
Comments