skip to main content
10.1145/3458359.3458367acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Comparative Analysis of Rainfall Prediction Model Based on GPS and BDS Signals

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Rainfall prediction plays an important role in guiding agricultural development and natural disaster prediction. However, the prediction of rainfall with many influencing factors is extremely complicated, which makes high-precision prediction very difficult. This work verify the feasibility of using GPS and BDS signals to predict rainfall, and compare their accuracy.This study proposes a neural network model based on GNSS signals to predict rainfall.The paper uses the precipitable water vapor data retrieved by Global Positioning System (GPS) and Beidou positioning system (BDS), combining with neural network algorithm, to predict the actual rainfall. The experiment proves that the assumption is feasible and experimental results show that the mean absolute error of the GPS-based prediction and BDS-based prediction are 0.2-0.25(mm) and 0.15-0.2(mm), respectively. Neural network prediction model performs well.The both results are in line with meteorological requirements, while the latter accuracy is higher.

References

  1. Y. Wang, Z. Guo, Y. Liu, H. Xu, K. Ding and D. Wen, "The study of rainfall forecast based on neural network and GPS precipitable water vapor," 2010 The 2nd Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology, Wuhan, 2010, pp. 17-20, doi: 10.1109/ESIAT.2010.5568487.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Xiaoming Li , "Estimation of the Precipitable Water Vapor from ground-based GPS with GAMIT/GLOBK," 2010 Second IITA International Conference on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Qingdao, 2010, pp. 210-214, doi: 10.1109/IITA-GRS.2010.5603260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nilsson T , Gradinarsky L . Water vapor tomography using GPS phase observations: simulation results[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoence & Remote Sensing, 2006, 44:2927-2941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. Li and H. Wang, "Using GAMIT to Derive the Precipitabel Water Vapor," 2010 International Conference on Multimedia Technology, Ningbo, 2010, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ICMULT.2010.5629717.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. R. Kumar, S. Kumar Panda, D. V. Ratnam and R. Narayan Dash, "Dual-Frequency GPS Derived Precipitable Water Vapor and Comparison with ERA-Interim Reanalysis Data Over Indian stations," 2018 International Conference on Recent Innovations in Electrical, Electronics&Communication Engineering(ICRIEECE), Bhubaneswar,India,2018,pp.3196-3201,doi: 10.1109/ICRIEECE44171.2018.9008654.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. U. Weinbach and S. Schön, "On the correlation of tropospheric zenith path delay and station clock estimates in geodetic GNSS frequency transfer," EFTF-2010 24th European Frequency and Time Forum, Noordwijk, 2010, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/EFTF.2010.6533695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Manandhar, Y. H. Lee and S. Dev, "GPS derived PWV for rainfall monitoring," 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Beijing, 2016, pp. 2170-2173, doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Areerachakul and P. Junsawang, "Rainfall-Runoff relationship for streamflow discharge forecasting by ANN modelling," World Congress on Sustainable Technologies (WCST-2014), London, 2014, pp. 27-30, doi: 10.1109/WCST.2014.7030090.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Sachan, "Forecasting of rainfall using ANN, GPS and mteorological data," International Conference for Convergence for Technology-2014, Pune, 2014, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/I2CT.2014.7092314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Z. Jiang and G. Shen, "Prediction of House Price Based on The Back Propagation N eural Network in The Keras Deep Learning Framework," 2019 6th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), Shanghai, China, 2019, pp. 1408-1412, doi: 10.1109/ICSAI48974.2019.9010071.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IEEA '21: Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications
    March 2021
    105 pages
    ISBN:9781450389020
    DOI:10.1145/3458359

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format