skip to main content
10.1145/3458380.3458398acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdspConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Surface and Volume Fusion Rendering for Augmented Reality Based Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Published:23 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is widely used in head and neck clinical surgery. The nasal cavity is intraoperatively visualised using an endoscope. However, the correct identification of complex structures and the perception of key target spatial relationship are difficult to perform using 2D endoscopic images. Surgeons need to visualise a 3D structure from endoscopic images and patients’ preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. Therefore, this paper presents a fusion rendering method for augmented reality based on endoscopic imaging. Motion consistency was performed to improve the number and accuracy of texture-less endoscopic image matching. The gradient optimisation of volume data was used to enhance the rendering and improve the distance perception of multi-layer information. The surface fusion error of the reconstructed surface and CT extraction reached 0.58mm, 3.86mm, and 4.03mm in the model data, cadaver skull data and clinical data, respectively. Various experimental results proved that our method can provide the accurate surface structure of the nasal cavity and can effectively improve the depth distinction of multiple objects for clinical surgery.

References

  1. Totz Johannes, Mountney Peter, Stoyanov Danailet al, Dense surface reconstruction for enhanced navigation in MIS[M], 2011: 89-96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Visentini-Scarzanella Marco, Mylonas George P., Stoyanov Danailet al, i-BRUSH: A gaze-contingent virtual paintbrush for dense 3D reconstruction in robotic assisted surgery[M], 2009: 353-360Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Souzaki Ryota, Ieiri Satoshi, Uemura Munenoriet al, An augmented reality navigation system for pediatric oncologic surgery based on preoperative CT and MRI images[M], 2013: 2479-2483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lowe D G . Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2):91-110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rublee E, Rabaud V, Konolige K, ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF[C]//ICCV. 2011, 11(1): 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lin B, Sun Y, Sanchez J E, Efficient vessel feature detection for endoscopic image analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2014, 62(4): 1141-1150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yang X, Cheng K T. Learning optimized local difference binaries for scalable augmented reality on mobile devices[J]. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 2013, 20(6): 852-865.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Luo Z, Shen T, Zhou L, Geodesc: Learning local descriptors by integrating geometry constraints[C]//Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 2018: 168-183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chum O, Matas J, Kittler J. Locally optimized RANSAC[C]//Joint Pattern Recognition Symposium. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003: 236-243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mirota Daniel J., Wang Hanzi, Taylor Russell H.et al. A system for video-Based navigation for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2012, 31)4(: 963-976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Zang Xiao Jun, Weng Dong Dong, Wang Yong Tianet al. Navigation System for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Based on Augmented Reality[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wahid H, Ahmad S, Nor M A M, Prestasi kecekapan pengurusan kewangan dan agihan zakat: perbandingan antara majlis agama islam negeri di Malaysia[J]. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 2017, 51(2): 39-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Porter T, Duff T. Compositing digital images[C]//ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics. ACM, 1984, 18(3): 253-259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Maule M, Comba J L D, Torchelsen R P, A survey of raster-based transparency techniques[J]. Computers & Graphics, 2011, 35(6): 1023-1034.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lu, A., Morris, C.J., Taylor, J., Ebert, D.S., Hansen, C., Rheingans, P., Hartner, M., 2003. Illustrative interactive stipple rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 9, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2003.1196001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ma J, Zhou H, Zhao J, Robust feature matching for remote sensing image registration via locally linear transforming[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(12): 6469-6481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Zhou K, Gong M, Huang X, Data-parallel octrees for surface reconstruction[J]. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 2010, 17(5): 669-681.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckbert P S. Survey of Texture Mapping[J]. Computer Graphics & Applications IEEE, 1986, 6(11):56-67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Levoy, "Efficient Ray Tracing of Volume Data," ACM Trans. Graph. 9(3), 245–261 (1990).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Surface and Volume Fusion Rendering for Augmented Reality Based Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICDSP '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing
            February 2021
            336 pages
            ISBN:9781450389365
            DOI:10.1145/3458380

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 September 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format