skip to main content
10.1145/3459990.3465206acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Apples and Oranges: Comparing Crafty Sonic Circuits for Electronics Education

Published: 24 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The Apple Amp and Orange Synth are solderless craft-based sonic teaching circuits developed to support a remote STEAM summer camp for 8 - 11 year old girls. In this paper, we use autoethnographic reflection and thematic analysis to compare and contrast the functionality and pedagogical applications of these two circuits. We explore how the circuits could facilitate complementary approaches to electronics education by pairing more and less predictable sonic outcomes. We further consider how the circuits and scaffolding activities might be redesigned to better align with goals of constructivist and constructionist learning environments.

References

[1]
Edith Ackermann. 2001. Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication 5, 3 (2001), 438.
[2]
Arduino.cc. 2020. Arduino Uno. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from https://store.arduino.cc/usa/arduino-uno-rev3
[3]
Abby Aresty. 2020. Girls Electronic Arts Retreat - About. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from https://www.girlselectronicartsretreat.org/about
[4]
Abby Aresty and Rachel Gibson. 2021, Forthcoming. Changing GEAR: The Girls Electronic Arts Retreat’s Teaching Interfaces for Musical Expression. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (2021, Forthcoming). https://nime.pubpub.org/pub/8lop0zj4
[5]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[6]
Leah Buechley and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2010. LilyPad in the Wild: How Hardware’s Long Tail is Supporting New Engineering and Design Communities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858206
[7]
Heewon Chang. 2016. Autoethnography as method. Vol. 1. Routledge, New York.
[8]
The Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher 32, 1 (2003), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
[9]
Oberlin College and Conservatory. 2021. Oberlin College and Conservatory. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from http://www.oberlin.edu/
[10]
Oberlin College and Conservatory. 2021. Technology in Music and Related Arts. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from http://timara.oberlin.edu/
[11]
Nicolas Collins. 2020. Handmade Electronic Music. Routledge, New York.
[12]
Josh Urban Davis. 2019. IllumiWear: A Fiber-Optic eTextile for MultiMedia Interactions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Marcelo Queiroz and Anna Xambó Sedó (Eds.). UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 449–454. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3673033
[13]
Texas Instruments. 2017. LM386 Low Voltage Audio Power Amplifier. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm386.pdf
[14]
David R Krathwohl. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice 41, 4 (2002), 212–218.
[15]
Christina Kubisch. 2004. Electrical Walks. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from http://www.christinakubisch.de/en/works/electrical_walks
[16]
Andrew P. McPherson, Alan Chamberlain, Adrian Hazzard, Sean McGrath, and Steve Benford. 2016. Designing for Exploratory Play with a Hackable Digital Musical Instrument(DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901831
[17]
Cedric Mivielle. 2016. What is ludic about ludic design ? A back and forth between theory and practice.https://doi.org/10.7190/ead/2015/152
[18]
Joanna Neil. 2019. Creating Spaces for Reflection with Digital Autoethnography: Students as Researchers into Their Own Practices. International Journal of Art & Design Education 38, 4 (2019), 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12268
[19]
Kylie Peppler. 2013. ”STEAM-Powered Computing Education: Using E-Textiles to Integrate the Arts and STEM”. Computer 46(2013), 38–43.
[20]
Afroditi Psarra. 2019. Lilytronica. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from http://afroditipsarra.com/index.php?/on-going/lily/
[21]
Jie Qi. 2014. Chibitronics. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from https://technolojie.com/chibitronics/
[22]
Jess Rowland. 2013. Flexible Audio Speakers for Composition and Art Practice. Leonardo Music Journal 23 (12 2013), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/LMJ_a_00151 arXiv:https://direct.mit.edu/lmj/article-pdf/doi/10.1162/LMJ_a_00151/1674885/lmj_a_00151.pdf
[23]
Rebecca Stewart. 2019. Cords and Chords: Exploring the Role of E-Textiles in Computational Audio. Frontiers in ICT 6(2019), 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2019.00002
[24]
Sam Topley. 2016. ”Giant Noisy Pom-Poms”. https://www.samantha-topley.co.uk/giantpompom.html
[25]
Irmandy Wicaksono and Joseph Paradiso. 2020. KnittedKeyboard: Digital Knitting of Electronic Textile Musical Controllers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Romain Michon and Franziska Schroeder (Eds.). Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK, 323–326. https://www.nime.org/proceedings/2020/nime2020_paper62.pdf
[26]
Project Zero. 2018. Pedagogy of Play Handbook, Harvard University Graduate School of Education. Retrieved April 10, 2021 from https://pz.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/PoP%20Playbook.pdf

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Toolkit for Crafting Simple Sonic Interfaces in EducationProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664266(35-37)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '21: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
June 2021
697 pages
ISBN:9781450384520
DOI:10.1145/3459990
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. STEAM
  2. craft
  3. e-textiles
  4. education

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

IDC '21
Sponsor:
IDC '21: Interaction Design and Children
June 24 - 30, 2021
Athens, Greece

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Upcoming Conference

IDC '25
Interaction Design and Children
June 23 - 26, 2025
Reykjavik , Iceland

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Toolkit for Crafting Simple Sonic Interfaces in EducationProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664266(35-37)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media