skip to main content
10.1145/3460238.3460253acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbetConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic Blood Oxygen Saturation Monitoring based on a New IPPG Detecting Device

Published:20 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Background: Nowadays, Cardiovascular disease is a severe threat to human health. It is necessary to monitor the cardiovascular parameters such as blood oxygen saturation reliably and conveniently. Non-contact measurement has been widely studied. However, some inevitable factors limit the use of the platform and even lead to inaccurate estimation. Hence, this study proposed a new method to estimate blood oxygen saturation.

Methods: This paper introduced a new IPPG device consisting of a dual-wavelength light source system, an enclosed illumination chamber and an RGB camera. In order to get a high-precision SpO2 calculation model, the data obtained and processed from the system are compared to the output of a traditional figure blood volume pulse sensor that was employed on 20 subjects at the same time. The most suitable region of interest (ROI) area was determined based on previous research.

Findings: The comparison showed that the data from the new IPPG system is consistent and comparable with the traditional pulse oximeter. Compared to other IPPG-based measuring methods, our new IPPG device can remove the motion artifacts caused by body movement well. What's more, the consistency of the environment was maintained and reduce the interference of the external environment during the experiment because of the device.

References

  1. E.J. Benjamin, M.J. Blaha, S.E. Chiuve, M. Cushman, S.R. Das, R. Deo, , Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association, Circulation 135(10) (2017) e146-e603. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122885.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Writing Group, D. Mozaffarian, E.J. Benjamin, A.S. Go, D.K. Arnett, M.J. Blaha, , Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics–2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association, Circulation 133(4) (2016) 447-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Cook, M. Togni, M.C. Schaub, P. Wenaweser, O.M. Hess, High heart rate: a cardiovascular risk factor?, Eur Heart J 27(20) (2006) 2387-93. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17000632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M.M. Scheinman, M.A. Brown, E. Rapaport, Critical Assessment of Use of Central Venous Oxygen Saturation as a Mirror of Mixed Venous Oxygen in Severely Ill Cardiac Patients, Circulation 40(2) (1969) 165-172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Pichler, B. Urlesberger, N. Baik, B. Schwaberger, C. Binder-Heschl, A. Avian, , Cerebral Oxygen Saturation to Guide Oxygen Delivery in Preterm Neonates for the Immediate Transition after Birth: A 2-Center Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial, The Journal of Pediatrics 170 (2016) 73-78.e4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. K.R. Walley, Use of Central Venous Oxygen Saturation to Guide Therapy, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 184(5) (2011) 514-520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. W. McNicholas, Kent, Mitchell, Hypoxemia in patients with COPD: cause, effects, and disease progression, International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Takatani, P.W. Cheung, E.A. Ernst, A non-invasive tissue reflectance oximeter, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 8(1) (1980) 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P.W. McCormick, M. Stewart, M.G. Goetting, G. Balakrishnan, Regional cerebrovascular oxygen saturation measured by optical spectroscopy in humans, Stroke 22(5) (1991) 596-602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. W. Verkruysse, L.O. Svaasand, J.S. Nelson, Remote plethysmographic imaging using ambient light, Optics Express 16(26) (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. F.P. Wieringa, F. Mastik, A.F.W.v.d. Steen, Contactless Multiple Wavelength Photoplethysmographic Imaging: A First Step Toward “SpO2 Camera” Technology, Annals of Biomedical Engineering 33(8) (2005) 1034-1041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A.A.R. Kamal, J.B. Harness, G. Irving, A.J. Mearns, Skin photoplethysmography — a review, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 28(4) (1989) 257-269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Allen, Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement, Physiological Measurement 28(3) (2007) R1-R39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M.-Z. Poh, D.J. McDuff, R.W. Picard, Advancements in Noncontact, Multiparameter Physiological Measurements Using a Webcam, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 58(1) (2011) 7-11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. C.G. Scully, L. Jinseok, J. Meyer, A.M. Gorbach, D. Granquist-Fraser, Y. Mendelson, , Physiological Parameter Monitoring from Optical Recordings With a Mobile Phone, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 59(2) (2012) 303-306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. W.P. Joyce, K. Walsh, D.B. Gough, T.F. Gorey, J.M. Fitzpatrick, Pulse oximetry: A new non-invasive assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease, British Journal of Surgery 77(10) (1990) 1115-1117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J.E. Sinex, Pulse oximetry: Principles and limitations, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 17(1) (1999) 59-66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M.C. Wilkins, Residual bacterial contamination on reusable pulse oximetry sensors, Respir Care 38(11) (1993) 1155-60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10145923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. X.F. Teng, Y.T. Zhang, The effect of contacting force on photoplethysmographic signals, Physiol Meas 25(5) (2004) 1323-35. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15535195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J.A. Pollard, Cardiac arrhythmias and pulse variability: a plethysmographic study, Anaesthesia 25(1) (1970) 63-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5413231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. H.D. Hummler, A. Engelmann, F. Pohlandt, J. Hogel, A.R. Franz, Accuracy of pulse oximetry readings in an animal model of low perfusion caused by emerging pneumonia and sepsis, Intensive Care Med 30(4) (2004) 709-13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14722632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. N.S. Trivedi, A.F. Ghouri, N.K. Shah, E. Lai, S.J. Barker, Effects of motion, ambient light, and hypoperfusion on pulse oximeter function, J Clin Anesth 9(3) (1997) 179-83. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9172022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. U. Bal, Non-contact estimation of heart rate and oxygen saturation using ambient light, Biomedical Optics Express 6(1) (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K.H. Shelley, Photoplethysmography: Beyond the Calculation of Arterial Oxygen Saturation and Heart Rate, Anesthesia & Analgesia 105(On Line Suppl.) (2007) S31-S36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Humphreys, T. Ward, C. Markham, Non-contact simultaneous dual wavelength photoplethysmography: A further step toward non-contact pulse oximetry, Review of Scientific Instruments 78(4) (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. K. Humphreys, T. Ward, C. Markham, A CMOS Camera-Based Pulse Oximetry Imaging System, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, 2005, pp. 3494-3497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Y. Sun, N. Thakor, Photoplethysmography Revisited: From Contact to Noncontact, From Point to Imaging, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 63(3) (2016) 463-477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Q. Fan, K. Li, Non-contact remote estimation of cardiovascular parameters, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 40 (2018) 192-203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. L. Kong, Y. Zhao, L. Dong, Y. Jian, X. Jin, B. Li, , Non-contact detection of oxygen saturation based on visible light imaging device using ambient light, Optics Express 21(15) (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. D. Shao, C. Liu, F. Tsow, Y. Yang, Z. Du, R. Iriya, , Non-contact Monitoring of Blood Oxygen Saturation Using Camera and Dual-Wavelength Imaging System, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 63(6) (2016) 1091-1098.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBET '21: Proceedings of the 2021 11th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology
    March 2021
    200 pages
    ISBN:9781450387897
    DOI:10.1145/3460238

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 July 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format