skip to main content
10.1145/3460881.3460915acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Users' Perspectives on Haptic Technology Use in Hand Rehabilitation

Published:28 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Haptics is a technology that registers touch by applying vibrations, motion, or forces to the user while interacting with robotic devices. The literature on the use of haptics in robots designed for upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients spans over the last two decades. Research focuses on clinical results without addressing users' perspectives. Therefore, this paper aimed to examine the users' views on using haptics to augment technology-enabled physiotherapy interventions. We analyzed 42 articles that involved haptics to find information about users' views and found that no studies included data on users' perspectives on haptics. Therefore, it is recommended that researchers collect qualitative data when studying the effect of haptic technologies so that user's perspectives are evidenced as part of the validation and clinical studies.

References

  1. W. Rosamond, K. Flegal, K. Furie , "Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update: a report from the American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee," Circulation, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. e25–e146, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. M. Pedersen, A. Wandel, H. S. Jørgensen, H. Nakayama, H. O. Raaschou, and T. S. Olsen, "Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation. The Copenhagen stroke study," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 25–28, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. W. Dromerick, C. E. Lang, R. Birkenmeier, M. G. Hahn, S. A. Sahrmann, and D. F. Edwards, "Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke," Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 401, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. S. Nicholslarsen, P. C. Clark, A. Zeringue, A. Greenspan, and S. Blanton, "Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery," Stroke, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1480–1484, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M Sreelakshmi, TD Subash. Haptic Technology: A comprehensive review on its applications and future prospects. Mater. Today Proc. vol. 4, 2017, pp. 4182–4187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. CV Loureiro, WS Harwin, Johnson M, Nagai K. Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Med Biol Eng Comput. vol. 49, 2011, pp. 1103e1118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. BT Volpe, PT Huerta, JL Zipse, Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol.vol. 66, 2009, pp. 1086e1090.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. JL Pons, R Ceres, L Calderon. Introduction to wearable robotics. In: Pons JL, ed. Wearable Robotics in Biomectronic Exoskeletons. Hiboken, NJ 07030: John Wiley and Sons; 2008, pp. 1e16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. DJ Reinkensmeyer. Robotic Assistance for Upper Extremity Training after Stroke. In: Gaggioli A, Keshner EA, Weiss PL, Riva E, eds. Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation. IOS Press; 2009, pp. 25e39. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A Frisoli, F Rocchi, S Marcheschi, A Dettori, F Salsedo, M Bergamasco. A new force-feedback arm exoskeleton for haptic interaction in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE World Haptics Conference. 2005, pp. 195e201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A Frisoli, M Bergamasco, MC Carboncini, B Rossi. Robotic assisted rehabilitation in virtual reality with the L-EXOS. In: Gaggioli A, Keshner EA, Weiss PL, Riva E, eds. Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation. IOS Press; 2009, pp. 40e54. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. LE Kahn, PS Lum, WZ Rymer, DJ Reinkensmeyer. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: does it matter what the robot does? J Rehab Res Dev. vol 41(5), 2006, pp. 619e630. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P Bonato. Advances in wearable technology for rehabilitation. In: Gaggioli A, Keshner EA, Weiss PL, Riva E, eds. Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation. IOS Press; 2009, pp. 145e159. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MS Cameirao, I Bermudez, S Badia, OE Duarte, PF Verschure. The rehabilitation gaming system: a review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009, pp.145:65e83. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. vol. 8, 2005, pp. 241e262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Augmented Reality" (PDF). Zums.ac.ir. Retrieved 19 April2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabriel Robles-De-La-Torre. "International Society for Haptics: Haptic technology, an animated explanation". Isfh.org. Archived from the original on 2010-03-07. Retrieved 2010-02-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. L Piggott, S Wagner, and M Ziat. "Haptic neurorehabilitation and virtual reality for upper limb paralysis: A review." Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering vol. 44, 2016, pp. 1-2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P Tadi, F Lui. Acute Stroke (Cerebrovascular Accident). Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535369/ (accessed 28.2.2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J Broeren. Virtual Rehabilitation in an Activity Centre for Community-Dwelling Persons with Stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. vol. 26, 2008, pp. 289–296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J Deutsch. Haptics and Virtual Reality Used to Increase Strength and Improve Function in Chronic Individuals Post-Stroke: Two Case Reports . NEUROLOGY REPORT. vol. 26, 2002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A Merians. Virtual Reality-Augmented. Physicol Therapy . vol. 82 Number 9. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A Merians. Sensorimotor Training in a Virtual Reality Environment:Does It Improve Functional Recovery Poststroke? The American Society of Neurorehabilitation. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. H.-C. Wu. The potential effect of a vibrotactile glove rehabilitation system on motor recovery in chronic post-stroke hemiparesis. Technology and Health Care. 2017, pp. 1183-1187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S.-C Yeh. The Efficacy of a Haptic-Enhanced Virtual Reality System for Precision Grasp Acquisition in Stroke Rehabilitation. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2017 Article ID 9840273, 9 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Users' Perspectives on Haptic Technology Use in Hand Rehabilitation
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AH2021: 12th Augmented Human International Conference
        May 2021
        73 pages
        ISBN:9781450390309
        DOI:10.1145/3460881

        Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 May 2021

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format