skip to main content
10.1145/3461564.3461570acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What’s in a Pattern: A Vocabulary to Articulate Group Routines and Practices

Published: 21 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

When people come together as part of a community, oriented towards a collective activity, over an extended period of time, they develop and maintain different routines for the way they are organized, delegate, and carry out their activities. These routines involve a mixture of artifacts and technologies, and are shaped by key common dimensions such as how regulated an activity is, or whether it must follow a particular order. The routines also becomes inherited by new members of the community who use and develop them in their activity. We propose that similar routines, taking place across different communities, with their technologies and dimensions can be expressed and understood as a pattern. We present four patterns as examples that highlight the ways in which communities carry out routines related to organizing and engaging in their joint activity and discuss how such ways of addressing patterns may support the design of new community technologies.

References

[1]
Christopher Alexander. 1977. A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford university press.
[2]
Klaus B. Bærentsen. 1989. Mennesker og maskiner. In Et virksomt liv, Mariane Hedegaard, Vagn Rabøl Hansen, and Sven Thyssen (Eds.). Aarhus Universitetsforlag, Aarhus, Denmark, 142–187.
[3]
Olav Wedege Bertelsen and Susanne Bødker. 2003. Activity Theory. Vol. Chapter 11. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 291–324.
[4]
Olav W. Bertelsen, Henrik Korsgaard, Ingrid Kuhn, Carolin Schröder, Yngve Sundblad, and Kondrad Tollmar. 2015. Residents’ democratic engagement in public housing and urban areas – structures, formalities and technologies. Aarhus series on human centered computing 1, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21391 Available Open Access publishedVersion at http://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/5844.
[5]
Susanne Bødker. 1987. Through the Interface - a Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. DAIMI Report Series 16, 224 (Apr. 1987). https://doi.org/10.7146/dpb.v16i224.7586
[6]
Susanne Bødker and Peter Bøgh Andersen. 2005. Complex Mediation. Human–Computer Interaction 20, 4 (2005), 353–402. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2004_1
[7]
Susanne Bødker, Ellen Christiansen, and Manfred Thüring. 1995. A conceptual toolbox for designing CSCW applications, COOP’95. (1995), 266–284.
[8]
Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2011. The Human-Artifact Model: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Artifact Ecologies. Human-Computer Interaction 26, 4 (2011), 315–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.626709
[9]
Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2012. Dynamics in Artifact Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (Copenhagen, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399085
[10]
Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, Peter Lyle, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. Happenstance, Strategies and Tactics: Intrinsic Design in a Volunteer-Based Community. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971564
[11]
Susanne Bødker, Henrik Korsgaard, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2016. ’A Farmer, a Place and at Least 20 Members’: The Development of Artifact Ecologies in Volunteer-Based Communities(CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820029
[12]
Susanne Bødker, Myriam Lewkowicz, and Alexander Boden. 2020. What’s in a Word? Platforms Supporting the Platform Economy. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (Tallinn, Estonia) (NordiCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 87, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420167
[13]
Susanne Bødker and Peter Lyle. 2017. Community end-user development: Patterns, platforms, possibilities and problems. IS-EUD 2017 (2017), 76.
[14]
Susanne Bødker, Peter Lyle, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2017. Untangling the Mess of Technological Artifacts: Investigating Community Artifact Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Troyes, France) (C&T ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083675
[15]
John M. Carroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 1996. Developing the Blacksburg Electronic Village. Commun. ACM 39, 12 (Dec. 1996), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/240483.240498
[16]
Andy Dearden and Janet Finlay. 2006. Pattern Languages in HCI: A Critical Review. Human–Computer Interaction 21, 1 (2006), 49–102. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2101_3
[17]
John Dewey. 1916. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Macmillan.
[18]
Pelle Ehn. 1990. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA.
[19]
Yrjö Engeström. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsulit Oy, Helsinki.
[20]
Yrjö Engeström, Engeström Ritva, and Vähäaho Tarja. 1999. When the centre does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In Activity theory and social practice: Cultural historical approaches, Seth Chaiklin, Mariane Hedegaard, and Uffe Juul Jensen (Eds.). Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.
[21]
Thomas Erickson. 2000. Lingua Francas for Design: Sacred Places and Pattern Languages. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (New York City, New York, USA) (DIS ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347794
[22]
Anton Fedosov, Masako Kitazaki, William Odom, and Marc Langheinrich. 2019. Sharing Economy Design Cards. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300375
[23]
Martha S. Feldman and Brian T. Pentland. 2003. Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 1 (2003), 94–118. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3556620
[24]
Marcus Foth and Greg Hearn. 2007. Networked Individualism of Urban Residents: Discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings. Information, Communication & Society 10, 5 (2007), 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658095
[25]
P Y. Gal’erin. 1969. Stages in the development of mental acts. In A Handbook of Contemporary Soviet Psychology, Michael Cole and Irving Maltzman (Eds.). Basic Books, New York, 249–273.
[26]
Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. 1995. Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Pearson Education India.
[27]
Ali Gheitasy, José Abdelnour-Nocera, and Bonnie Nardi. 2015. Socio-Technical Gaps in Online Collaborative Consumption (OCC): An Example of the Etsy Community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication (Limerick, Ireland) (SIGDOC ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 35, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2775441.2775458
[28]
Thomas Herrmann, Marcel Hoffmann, Isa Jahnke, Andrea Kienle, Gabriele Kunau, Kai-Uwe Loser, and Natalja Menold. 2003. Concepts for Usable Patterns of Groupware Applications. In Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1145/958160.958216
[29]
Victor Kaptelinin and Liam J. Bannon. 2012. Interaction Design Beyond the Product: Creating Technology-Enhanced Activity Spaces. Human–Computer Interaction 27, 3 (2012), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.646930
[30]
Helena Karasti and Karen S. Baker. 2008. Community Design: Growing One’s Own Information Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (Bloomington, Indiana) (PDC ’08). Indiana University, USA, 217–220.
[31]
Henrik Gutzon Larsen. 2019. Three phases of Danish cohousing: tenure and the development of an alternative housing form. Housing Studies 34, 8 (2019), 1349–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1569599
[32]
Jean Lave. 1988. Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press.
[33]
Jay L. Lemke. 2000. Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7, 4 (2000), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
[34]
A.N. Leontiev. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. http://marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/index.htm
[35]
Aleksei N. Leontiev. 1974. The Problem of Activity in Psychology. Soviet Psychology 13, 2 (1974), 4–33. http://www.comnet.ca/~pballan/Leontiev%281979%29.htm
[36]
Jun Liu and Sudha Ram. 2009. Who does what: Collaboration patterns in the wikipedia and their impact on data quality. In 19th Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems. 175–180.
[37]
Peter Lyle, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, and Marcus Foth. 2013. HCI for City Farms: Design Challenges and Opportunities. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler(Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 109–116.
[38]
Peter Lyle, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, and Marcus Foth. 2014. Designing for Grassroots Food Production: An Event-Based Urban Agriculture Community. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design (Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) (OzCHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 362–365. https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686666
[39]
Peter Lyle, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, and Marcus Foth. 2015. Growing Food in the City: Design Ideations for Urban Residential Gardeners. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Limerick, Ireland) (C&T ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768549
[40]
Peter Lyle, Marcus Foth, and Jaz Hee-jeong Choi. 2015. Design Patterns for Urban Gardening. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6_5
[41]
Peter Lyle, Henrik Korsgaard, and Susanne Bødker. 2020. What’s in an Ecology? A Review of Artifact, Communicative, Device and Information Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (Tallinn, Estonia) (NordiCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 88, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420185
[42]
Peter Lyle, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Cláudia Silva, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Communication in Infrastructuring, or Tales from a Collaborative Project. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Melbourne, Australia) (OzCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292179
[43]
Peter Lyle, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174026
[44]
David Martin and Ian Sommerville. 2004. Patterns of Cooperative Interaction: Linking Ethnomethodology and Design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 11, 1 (March 2004), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/972648.972651
[45]
Kathryn McCamant and Charles Durrett. 1994. Cohousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. Ten Speed Press.
[46]
Malcolm McCullough. 2004. Digital ground: Architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. MIT press.
[47]
Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2000. Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 11, 4 (2000), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
[48]
A.V. Petrovsky. 1982. Toward the Construction of a Social Psychological Theory of the Collective. Soviet Psychology 21, 2 (1982), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040521023 [first published in Russian in 1973].
[49]
A.V. Petrovsky. 1983. The New Status of Psychological Theory Concerning Groups and Collectives. Soviet Psychology 21, 4 (1983), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405210457 [first published in Russian in 1977].
[50]
AV Petrovsky. 1985. Studies in psychology: The collective and the individual.(1985).
[51]
Mike Robinson. 1993. Keyracks and computers: an introduction to common artefact’ in computer supported cooperative work (CSCW). Wirtschaftsinformatik(1993).
[52]
Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from weiser’s vision of calm computing: Engaging ubicomp experiences. In International conference on Ubiquitous computing. Springer, 404–421.
[53]
Barbare Rogoff. 2003. The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford University Press.
[54]
Wolff-Michael Roth and Yew-Jin Lee. 2007. “Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research 77, 2 (2007), 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
[55]
Kjeld Schmidt and Liam J. Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously. Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1 (1992), 7–40.
[56]
Doug Schuler. 2002. A pattern language for living communication. In Proceedings of the participatory design conference 2002(PDC 2002). CPSR Press, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 51–62.
[57]
Douglas Schuler, Aldo de Moor, and Greg Bryant. 2020. New Community Research and Action Networks Addressing Wicked Problems Using Patterns and Pattern Languages. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (Bristol, United Kingdom) (ICT4S2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1145/3401335.3401818
[58]
Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Entanglements between Participatory Design and Feminism. In Proceedings of DRS 2018 International Conference: Catalyst(DRS 2018, Vol. 2). Limerick, Ireland, 458–471. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.557
[59]
John Shotter. 1978. The Cultural Context of Communication Studies:Theoretical and Methodological Issues. In Action, Gesture and Symbol, A. Lock (Ed.). Academic Press, London, 43–78.
[60]
Lucy Suchman. 2002. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian journal of information systems 14, 2 (2002), 7.
[61]
Lucy Suchman and Eleanor Wynn. 1984. IProcedures and problems in the office. Office Technology and People(1984), 113–1549.
[62]
Lucy A. Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
[63]
Will Sutherland and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2018. The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management 43 (2018), 328 – 341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004
[64]
Nick Taylor, Keith Cheverst, Dan Fitton, Nicholas J. P. Race, Mark Rouncefield, and Connor Graham. 2007. Probing Communities: Study of a Village Photo Display. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces(Adelaide, Australia) (OZCHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1324892.1324896
[65]
Pierre Tchounikine. 2017. Designing for Appropriation: A Theoretical Account. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 32, 4 (July 2017), 155–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1203263
[66]
Claire Wallace, Kathryn Vincent, Cristian Luguzan, and Hilary Talbot. 2015. Community Broadband Initiatives: What Makes Them Successful and Why?(C&T ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768548
[67]
Xiaolan Wang, Ron Wakkary, Carman Neustaedter, and Audrey Desjardins. 2015. Information Sharing, Scheduling, and Awareness in Community Gardening Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies(Limerick, Ireland) (C&T ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768556
[68]
Matthias Wenzel, Anja Danner-Schröder, and A. Paul Spee. 2020. Dynamic Capabilities? Unleashing Their Dynamics through a Practice Perspective on Organizational Routines. Journal of Management Inquiry 0, 0 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620916549
[69]
Thomas Wynn. 1993. Layers of thinking in tool behavior. In Tools, Language and Evolution, Tim Ingold, T. Kathrine Ingold, and K. Gibson(Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 389–406.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Working Jobless: Unemployment as WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868948:CSCW2(1-24)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2022)Collectives and Their Artifact EcologiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555336:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
C&T '21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech
June 2021
345 pages
ISBN:9781450390569
DOI:10.1145/3461564
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Routines
  2. collectives
  3. communities
  4. patterns

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

C&T '21
C&T '21: Communities & Technologies 2021
June 20 - 25, 2021
WA, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 183 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Working Jobless: Unemployment as WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868948:CSCW2(1-24)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2022)Collectives and Their Artifact EcologiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555336:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media