Not in my Backyard!? Lessons from a Community Conflict
Pages 234 - 244
Abstract
We present a case study of a local community debate about a land development proposal. The debate was not amicably resolved. It entrained an encampment, a lawsuit, a local electoral upheaval, and sustained outrage. It was a serious community conflict. Through a set of converging interviews and field visits with key actors from throughout the community, researchers reconstructed what happened, gathered diverse views about how and why it happened, and reviewed the shorter- and longer-term outcomes of the conflict. As can be true in significant conflicts, all participants can be seen as rational and well-intentioned, and some of the outcomes are clearly positive for the community. But the cost was high in terms of civility, trust, and community coherence. Implications include both insights into, and opportunities to re-conceive and redesign, local governance and planning policies, practices, and information support.
References
[1]
Mark Ackerman, Lada Adamic, Nicole Ellison, Darren Gergle, Brent Hecht, Cliff Lampe, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jaime Teevan. 2013. Social media question asking workshop. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion. 297–298.
[2]
Sherry R Arnstein. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners 35, 4 (1969), 216–224.
[3]
Albert Bandura, WH Freeman, and Richard Lightsey. 1999. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
[4]
Kenneth E Boulding. 1957. Organization and conflict. Conflict Resolution 1, 2 (1957), 122–134.
[5]
John M Carroll. 2014. The neighborhood in the Internet: Design research projects in community informatics. Routledge.
[6]
John M Carroll, Jordan Beck, Shipi Dhanorkar, Jomara Binda, Srishti Gupta, and Haining Zhu. 2018. Strengthening community data: towards pervasive participation. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age. 1–9.
[7]
John M Carroll and Debbie Denise Reese. 2003. Community collective efficacy: Structure and consequences of perceived capacities in the Blacksburg Electronic Village. In 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. IEEE, 10–pp.
[8]
John M Carroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 2013. Wild at home: The neighborhood as a living laboratory for HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 3(2013), 1–28.
[9]
John M Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, Umer Farooq, and Jamika D Burge. 2009. Community collective efficacy. In Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems. IGI Global, 608–619.
[10]
James S Coleman. 1957. Community conflict. Free Press.
[11]
Michael Dear. 1992. Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American planning association 58, 3(1992), 288–300.
[12]
Carl DiSalvo. 2011. Community and conflict. interactions 18, 6 (2011), 24–26.
[13]
Carl DiSalvo. 2015. Adversarial design. Design Thinking, Design Theory.
[14]
Lisa M Ellram. 1996. The use of the case study method in logistics research. Journal of business logistics 17, 2 (1996), 93.
[15]
Joseph P Fitzpatrick. 1966. The importance of “community” in the process of immigrant assimilation. The International Migration Digest 1, 1 (1966), 5–16.
[16]
Marcus Foth and Troy John Turner. 2019. The premise of institutioning for the proliferation of communities and technologies research. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on communities & technologies-transforming communities. 24–28.
[17]
Rina Ghose. 2001. Use of information technology for community empowerment: Transforming geographic information systems into community information systems. Transactions in GIS 5, 2 (2001), 141–163.
[18]
Barbara Gray Gricar and L Dave Brown. 1981. Conflict, power, and organization in a changing community. Human Relations 34, 10 (1981), 877–893.
[19]
Paulina Guerrero, Maja Steen Møller, Anton Stahl Olafsson, and Bernhard Snizek. 2016. Revealing cultural ecosystem services through Instagram images: The potential of social media volunteered geographic information for urban green infrastructure planning and governance. Urban Planning 1, 2 (2016), 1–17.
[20]
JR Gusfield. 1975. The community: a critical response Harper Colophon. New York (1975).
[21]
Karin Hansson, Laura Forlano, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Carl DiSalvo, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, Shaowen Bardzell, Silvia Lindtner, and Somya Joshi. 2018. Provocation, conflict, and appropriation: the role of the designer in making publics. Design Issues 34, 4 (2018), 3–7.
[22]
John E Hasse and Richard G Lathrop. 2003. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Applied geography 23, 2-3 (2003), 159–175.
[23]
Hella Hernberg and Ramia Mazé. 2018. Agonistic temporary space-reflections on’agonistic space’across participatory design and urban temporary use. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial-Volume 2. 1–5.
[24]
Yuheng Hu, Shelly D Farnham, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2013. Whoo. ly: Facilitating information seeking for hyperlocal communities using social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3481–3490.
[25]
Gohar Feroz Khan, Bobby Swar, and Sang Kon Lee. 2014. Social media risks and benefits: A public sector perspective. Social science computer review 32, 5 (2014), 606–627.
[26]
Kathryn Kloby and Leila Sadeghi. 2013. From Town Hall to the Virtual Community: Engaging the Public with Web 2.0 and Social Media Applications. In From Government to E-Governance: Public Administration in the Digital Age. IGI Global, 114–130.
[27]
Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaité, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. ” Everyone Is Talking about It!” A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 3127–3136.
[28]
Cliff Lampe, Rebecca Gray, Andrew T Fiore, and Nicole Ellison. 2014. Help is on the way: Patterns of responses to resource requests on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 3–15.
[29]
Sang M Lee and Soongoo Hong. 2002. An enterprise-wide knowledge management system infrastructure. Industrial management & data systems(2002).
[30]
Roy J Lewicki, Stephen E Weiss, and David Lewin. 1992. Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. Journal of organizational behavior 13, 3 (1992), 209–252.
[31]
Narges Mahyar, Michael R James, Michelle M Ng, Reginald A Wu, and Steven P Dow. 2018. CommunityCrit: inviting the public to improve and evaluate urban design ideas through micro-activities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
[32]
Jennifer Manuel, Geoff Vigar, Tom Bartindale, and Rob Comber. 2017. Participatory media: Creating spaces for storytelling in neighbourhood planning. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1688–1701.
[33]
Elaine Massung, David Coyle, Kirsten F Cater, Marc Jay, and Chris Preist. 2013. Using crowdsourcing to support pro-environmental community activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in Computing systems. 371–380.
[34]
Chantal Mouffe. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?Social research (1999), 745–758.
[35]
Khairul Baharein Mohd Noor. 2008. Case study: A strategic research methodology. American journal of applied sciences 5, 11 (2008), 1602–1604.
[36]
Leonardo Parra-Agudelo, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Marcus Foth, and Carlos Estrada. 2018. Creativity and design to articulate difference in the conflicted city: collective intelligence in Bogota’s grassroots organisations. AI & SOCIETY 33, 1 (2018), 147–158.
[37]
Louis R Pondy. 1967. Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative science quarterly(1967), 296–320.
[38]
Vololona Rabeharisoa, Tiago Moreira, and Madeleine Akrich. 2014. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society.
[39]
Dana Rotman, Sarah Vieweg, Sarita Yardi, Ed Chi, Jenny Preece, Ben Shneiderman, Peter Pirolli, and Tom Glaisyer. 2011. From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 819–822.
[40]
Robert J Sampson, Stephen W Raudenbush, and Felton Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. science 277, 5328 (1997), 918–924.
[41]
Gianluca Schiavo, Marco Milano, Jorge Saldivar, Tooba Nasir, Massimo Zancanaro, and Gregorio Convertino. 2013. Agora2. 0: enhancing civic participation through a public display. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 46–54.
[42]
Carissa Schively. 2007. Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: Reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of planning literature 21, 3 (2007), 255–266.
[43]
Ronald Schroeter. 2012. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 227–236.
[44]
Moushumi Sharmin, Brian P Bailey, Cole Coats, and Kevin Hamilton. 2009. Understanding knowledge management practices for early design activity and its implications for reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2367–2376.
[45]
Alex S Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessica Lingel. 2015. Data-in-place: Thinking through the relations between data and community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2863–2872.
[46]
Martijn Van Zomeren, Tom Postmes, and Russell Spears. 2008. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.Psychological bulletin 134, 4 (2008), 504.
[47]
Martijn Van Zomeren, Russell Spears, Agneta H Fischer, and Colin Wayne Leach. 2004. Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy.Journal of personality and social psychology 87, 5(2004), 649.
[48]
Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Christopher A Le Dantec, Eric Gordon, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2016. Digital civics: Citizen empowerment with and through technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 1096–1099.
[49]
Michael Williams and Tami Moser. 2019. The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review 15, 1 (2019), 45–55.
[50]
Robert K Yin. 2017. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Recommendations
Community Acknowledgment: Engaging Community Members in Volunteer Acknowledgment
GROUPVolunteers in non-profit groups are a valuable workforce that contributes to economic development and supports people in need in the U.S. However, many non-profit groups face challenges including engaging and sustaining volunteer participation, as well ...
Community Design: growing one's own information infrastructure
PDC '08: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008This paper examines the phenomenon of Community Design. It is a radical phenomenon in that community members collectively grow their own community information infrastructures without the intervention of professionals typically associated with such ...
The Problem of Community Engagement: Disentangling the Practices of Municipal Government
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, we work to inform the growing space of Digital Civics with a qualitative study of community engagement practices across the breadth of municipal departments and agencies in a large US city. We conducted 34 inter-views across 15 different ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 June 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
C&T '21
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 183 submissions, 44%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 125Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)20
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format