skip to main content
10.1145/3461615.3485402acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Development of a Multimodal Behavior Analysis System for Evaluating Dementia Care Interaction

Published:17 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

People with dementia may benefit from appropriate care. Understanding care interactions provide meaningful insight into social communication skills. The purpose of this paper is to construct an annotation scheme to represent expert knowledge and to verify whether it leads to the evaluation of care interactions. Focusing on the dementia care method by Humanitude, we have designed an annotation scheme and annotation structure. A multimodal behavior analysis system has been developed to analyze care interaction between caregivers and people with dementia. The point of our system is that it can generate a deep interpretation of care without experts. The video data which we have collected at a hospital have been analyzed, the features of skills and care interactions were extracted. These results are a part of the findings of empirical analysis of building human relationships.

References

  1. Y Gineste and J Pellissier. 2017. Humanitude:Comprendre la vieillesse prendre soin des Hommes vieux. Aramand Colin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T Hiramatsu, M Kamei, D Inoue, and et al.2020. Development of Dementia Care Training System Based on Augmented Reality and Whole Body Wearable Tactile Sensor. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2020), 4148–4154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M Honda, M Ito, S Ishikawa, and et al.2016. Reduction of Behavioral Psychological Symptoms of Dementia by Multimodal Comprehensive Care for Vulnerable Geriatric Patients in an Acute Care Hospital. A Case Series. Case Rep. Med.1–4 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S Ishikawa, M Ito, M Honda, and Y Takebayashi. 2016. The skill representation of a multimodal communication care method for people with dementia. JJAP Conference Proceedings 011616 (2016), 4. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAPCP.4.011616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M Ito, M Honda, Y Gineste, and et al.2015. An Examination of the Influence of Humanitude Caregiving on the Behavior of Older Adults with Dementia in Japan. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M Ito, R Takahashi, and P Liehr. 2007. Heeding the behavioral message of elders with dementia in day care. Holist Nurs Pract. 21(2007), 12–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004650-200701000-00004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dan Jurafsky. 1997. Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL shallow-discourse-function annotation coders manual. Institute of Cognitive Science Technical Report (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lauren Klein, Victor Ardulov, Yuhua Hu, and et al.2020. Incorporating Measures of Intermodal Coordination in Automated Analysis of Infant-Mother Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction(ICMI ’20). 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418870Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R.C.C.P.d Melo, P.J Costa, L.V.L Henriques, and et al.2019. Humanitude in the Humanization of Elderly Care: Experience Reports in a Health Service. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 72, 825–829 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A Nakazawa, Y Mitsuzumi, Y Watanabe, and et al.2020. First-person Video Analysis for Evaluating Skill Level in the Humanitude Tender-Care Technique. J Intell Robot Syst 98(2020), 103–118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R Prasad, N Dinesh, A Lee, E Miltsakaki, L Robaldo, A.K Joshi, and B.L Webber. 2008. The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0.Proc. LREC (2008), 2961–2968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John R Searle. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. (1975).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ninomiya T. 2015. Research on future projection of the population of the elderly with dementia in Japan 2015. Ministry of health, labour and welfare 2015. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Q Wu, S Qian, C Deng, and P. Yu. 2020. Understanding Interactions Between Caregivers and Care Recipients in Person-Centered Dementia Care: A Rapid Review. Clin Interv Aging. 15(2020), 1637–1647. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S255454Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Development of a Multimodal Behavior Analysis System for Evaluating Dementia Care Interaction
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ICMI '21 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
            October 2021
            418 pages
            ISBN:9781450384711
            DOI:10.1145/3461615

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 17 December 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format