skip to main content
10.1145/3461615.3485442acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Non-Verbal behaviors analysis of healthcare professionals engaged with a Virtual-Patient

Published:17 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual-Patients (VP) are currently developed to train healthcare professionals in several domains. In this paper, we specifically explore non-verbal behaviors of healthcare professionals engaged in an interaction with a VP that displays a neurodegenerative disease. The main motivation is to contribute to the training of healthcare professionals with a focus on non-verbal behaviors, which are known to play an important role in patient- caregivers interaction. Our paper presents the VirtuAlZ corpus which is a video corpus of 29 professional caregivers interacting with a VP. Based on the literature and exploratory studies, we developed an architecture able to perceive a list of non-verbal signals, which are then transformed in discrete symbols. An N-gram based approach is then exploited to model, analyze and compare healthcare professional strategies. In particular, we report analysis on the work experience context and we cluster the participants in order to understand the different patterns of behavior present in our corpus.

References

  1. Fotis Aisopos, George Papadakis, and Theodora Varvarigou. 2011. Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Content Using N-Gram Graphs. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Social Media (Scottsdale, Arizona, USA) (WSM ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072609.2072614Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. Baltrusaitis, A. Zadeh, Y. C. Lim, and L. Morency. 2018. OpenFace 2.0: Facial Behavior Analysis Toolkit. (2018), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/FG.2018.00019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amine Benamara, Brian Ravenet, Elise Prigent, Laurence Chaby, and Jean-Claude Martin. 2020. Patient virtuel Alzheimer: vers une modélisation informatique des pathologies émotionnelles et expressives. In Workshop sur les Affects, Compagnons artificiels et Interactions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Beatrice Biancardi. 2019. Les premières secondes comptent; Gérer les premières impressions pour un agent virtuel plus engageant. Ph.D. Dissertation. Sorbonne-Université, UPMC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. M. Bishop and N. Nasrabadi. 2007. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. J. Electronic Imaging 16(2007), 049901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Zhe Cao, Gines Hidalgo, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. 2018. OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using Part Affinity Fields. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Laurence Chaby and Pauline Narme. 2009. Processing facial identity and emotional expression in normal aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Psychologie & NeuroPsychiatrie du vieillissement 7, 1(2009), 31–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Cheng, Y. Chen, and W. Fang. 2015. Video anomaly detection and localization using hierarchical feature representation and Gaussian process regression. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2909–2917. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298909Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lauren Collins, Anne Schrimmer, James Diamond, and Janice Burke. 2011. Evaluating verbal and non-verbal communication skills, in an ethnogeriatric OSCE. Patient education and counseling 83 (05 2011), 158–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Cong, J. Yuan, and J. Liu. 2011. Sparse reconstruction cost for abnormal event detection. In CVPR 2011. 3449–3456. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995434Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Marc Damashek. 1995. Gauging Similarity with n-Grams: Language-Independent Categorization of Text. Science 267, 5199 (1995), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5199.843 arXiv:https://science.sciencemag.org/content/267/5199/843.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Marc Damashek. 1995. Gauging Similarity with n-Grams: Language-Independent Categorization of Text. Science 267, 5199 (1995), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5199.843 arXiv:https://science.sciencemag.org/content/267/5199/843.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. Delaherche and M. Chetouani. 2010. Multimodal coordination: exploring relevant features and measures. In SSPW ’10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lucile Dupuy, Etienne de Sevin, Hélène Cassoudesalle, Orlane Ballot, Patrick Dehail, Bruno Aouizerate, Emmanuel Cuny, Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi, and Pierre Philip. 2021. Guidelines for the design of a virtual patient for psychiatric interview training. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 15, 2 (2021), 99–107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Oluwapelumi Giwa and Marelie Davel. 2013. N-gram based Language Identification of Individual Words. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4846.4083Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gutemberg Guerra Filho and Yiannis Aloimonos. 2007. A Language for Human Action. Computer 40 (06 2007), 42 – 51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.154Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennifer Fong Ha and Nancy Longnecker. 2010. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner Journal 10, 1 (2010), 38–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Judith A Hall, Terrence G Horgan, and Nora A Murphy. 2019. Nonverbal communication. Annual Review of Psychology 70 (2019), 271–294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jinni A. Harrigan. 1985. Self-touching as an indicator of underlying affect and language processes. Social Science & Medicine 20, 11 (1985), 1161–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(85)90193-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rowan H Harwood, Rebecca O’Brien, Sarah E Goldberg, Rebecca Allwood, Alison Pilnick, Suzanne Beeke, Louise Thomson, Megan Murray, Ruth Parry, Fiona Kearney, 2018. A staff training intervention to improve communication between people living with dementia and health-care professionals in hospital: the VOICE mixed-methods development and evaluation study. Health Services and Delivery Research 6, 41 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hazaël Jones and Nicolas Sabouret. 2013. TARDIS - A simulation platform with an affective virtual recruiter for job interviews.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Joe H. Ward Jr.1963. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58, 301 (1963), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Patrick G Kenny and Thomas D Parsons. 2011. Embodied conversational virtual patients. In Conversational agents and natural language interaction: Techniques and effective practices. IGI Global, 254–281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dhruv Khullar. 2019. Building trust in health care—why, where, and how. Jama 322, 6 (2019), 507–509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Naomi MacBean, Deborah Theodoros, Bronwyn Davidson, and Anne E Hill. 2013. Simulated learning environments in speech-language pathology: An Australian response. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15, 3 (2013), 345–357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Marianne Mast. 2007. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. Patient education and counseling 67 (09 2007), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Vu H. Nguyen, Hien T. Nguyen, Hieu N. Duong, and Vaclav Snasel. 2016. N-Gram-Based Text Compression. Intell. Neuroscience 2016 (Nov. 2016), 9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9483646Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yasuharu Okuda, Ethan O Bryson, Samuel DeMaria Jr, Lisa Jacobson, Joshua Quinones, Bing Shen, and Adam I Levine. 2009. The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine 76, 4(2009), 330–343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Eric Orton and Paul Mulhausen. 2008. E-learning virtual patients for geriatric education. Gerontology & geriatrics education 28, 3 (2008), 73–88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Pierre Philip, Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi, Patricia Sagaspe, Etienne De Sevin, Jérôme Olive, Stéphanie Bioulac, and Alain Sauteraud. 2017. Virtual human as a new diagnostic tool, a proof of concept study in the field of major depressive disorders. Scientific reports 7, 1 (2017), 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Becerril-Ortega R., Vanderstichel H., L. Petit, Urbiolagallegos M.J., Schoch J., Dacunha S., A. Benamara, Ravenet B., Zagdoun J., and L. Chaby. [n.d.]. Didactical conception process of a virtual simulation environment for the training of healthcare professionals in geriatrics. Simulation Training through the Lens of Experience and Activity Analysis.([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. F. Ramseyer and W. Tschacher. 2006. Synchrony - a core concept for a constructivist approach to psychotherapy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Huamin Ren, Weifeng Liu, Søren Olsen, Sergio Escalera, and Thomas Moeslund. 2015. Unsupervised Behavior-Specific Dictionary Learning for Abnormal Event Detection. https://doi.org/10.5244/C.29.28Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Albert Rizzo, Russell Shilling, Eric Forbell, Stefan Scherer, Jonathan Gratch, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2016. Autonomous virtual human agents for healthcare information support and clinical interviewing. In Artificial intelligence in behavioral and mental health care. Elsevier, 53–79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kate E Robinson, Peter J Allen, Michelle Quail, and Janet Beilby. 2020. Virtual patient clinical placements improve student communication competence. Interactive Learning Environments 28, 6 (2020), 795–805.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Catherine Saint-Georges, Ammar Mahdhaoui, Mohamed Chetouani, Raquel S. Cassel, Marie-Christine Laznik, Fabio Apicella, Pietro Muratori, Sandra Maestro, Filippo Muratori, and David Cohen. 2011. Do Parents Recognize Autistic Deviant Behavior Long before Diagnosis? Taking into Account Interaction Using Computational Methods. PLOS ONE 6, 7 (07 2011), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022393Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Claude E. Shannon, Warren Weaver, and Shannon. 1998. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Mel Slater and Maria V Sanchez-Vives. 2016. Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016), 74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Pascal M Staccini and Jean-Paul Fournier. 2019. Virtual Patients and Serious Games. In Clinical Simulation. Elsevier, 41–51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Giota Stratou and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2016. MultiSense - Context-Aware Nonverbal Behavior Analysis Framework: A Psychological Distress Use Case. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing PP (09 2016), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2614300Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wataru Takano, Hirotaka Imagawa, and Yoshihiko Nakamura. [n.d.]. Prediction of human behaviors in the future through symbolic inference. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980422Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas B Talbot and Albert Skip Rizzo. 2019. Virtual Standardized Patients for Interactive Conversational Training: A Grand Experiment and New Approach. In Exploring the Cognitive, Social, Cultural, and Psychological Aspects of Gaming and Simulations. IGI Global, 62–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Lorraine Templier, Mohamed Chetouani, Monique Plaza, Zoé Belot, Patrick Bocquet, and Laurence Chaby. 2015. Altération de l’identification de la prosodie émotionnelle avec relative préservation de la production chez des patients atteints de la maladie d’Alzheimer. Gériatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement 13, 1(2015), 106–115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Philippe Thomas, Gérard Chandès, Cyril Hazif-Thomas, and Jacques Fontanille. 2017. Analyse du sens d’un trouble du comportement dans la démence. Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique 175, 10(2017), 906 – 913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2017.10.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Christian Thurau and Václav Hlaváč. 2007. N-Grams of Action Primitives for Recognizing Human Behavior. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns (Vienna, Austria) (CAIP’07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 93–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Connie Timmermann, Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt, and Regner Birkelund. 2017. Ethics in the communicative encounter: seriously ill patients’ experiences of health professionals’ nonverbal communication. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences 31, 1 (2017), 63–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Andrija Tomović, Predrag Janičić, and Vlado Kešelj. 2006. n-Gram-based classification and unsupervised hierarchical clustering of genome sequences. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 81, 2(2006), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.11.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Annick S van Manen Drs. 2020. A Communication Model for Nursing Staff Working in Dementia Care: Results of a Scoping Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies(2020), 103776.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Bin Zhao and Fei Fei Li. 2011. Online detection of unusual events in videos via dynamic sparse coding. 3313–3320. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995524Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. George Kingsley Zipf. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 588 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Non-Verbal behaviors analysis of healthcare professionals engaged with a Virtual-Patient
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICMI '21 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
          October 2021
          418 pages
          ISBN:9781450384711
          DOI:10.1145/3461615

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 17 December 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format