skip to main content
10.1145/3461702.3462577acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Fairness and Machine Fairness

Published:30 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prediction-based decisions, which are often made by utilizing the tools of machine learning, influence nearly all facets of modern life. Ethical concerns about this widespread practice have given rise to the field of fair machine learning and a number of fairness measures, mathematically precise definitions of fairness that purport to determine whether a given prediction-based decision system is fair. Following Reuben Binns (2017), we take "fairness" in this context to be a placeholder for a variety of normative egalitarian considerations. We explore a few fairness measures to suss out their egalitarian roots and evaluate them, both as formalizations of egalitarian ideas and as assertions of what fairness demands of predictive systems. We pay special attention to a recent and popular fairness measure, counterfactual fairness, which holds that a prediction about an individual is fair if it is the same in the actual world and any counterfactual world where the individual belongs to a different demographic group (cf. Kusner et al. 2018).

References

  1. Arneson, Richard, "Equality of Opportunity", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/equal-opportunity/>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Grgic-Hlaca, Nina, Zafar, Muhammad Bilal, Gummadi, Krishna P, and Weller, Adrian. The case for process fairness in learning: Feature selection for fair decision making. NIPS Symposium on Machine Learning and the Law, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hardt, M., Price, E., and Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3315--3323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J., Russell, C., and Silva, R. (2017). Counterfactual fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4066--4076.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fairness and Machine Fairness

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AIES '21: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
      July 2021
      1077 pages
      ISBN:9781450384735
      DOI:10.1145/3461702

      Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 July 2021

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate61of162submissions,38%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader