skip to main content
10.1145/3461702.3462599acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Becoming Good at AI for Good

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

AI for good (AI4G) projects involve developing and applying artificial intelligence (AI) based solutions to further goals in areas such as sustainability, health, humanitarian aid, and social justice. Developing and deploying such solutions must be done in collaboration with partners who are experts in the domain in question and who already have experience in making progress towards such goals. Based on our experiences, we detail the different aspects of this type of collaboration broken down into four high-level categories: communication, data, modeling, and impact, and distill eleven takeaways to guide such projects in the future. We briefly describe two case studies to illustrate how some of these takeaways were applied in practice during our past collaborations.

References

  1. Naheed R Abbasi, Helen M Shaw, Darrell S Rigel, Robert J Friedman, William H McCarthy, Iman Osman, Alfred W Kopf, and David Polsky. 2004. Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria. JAMA, Vol. 292, 22 (2004), 2771--2776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Raja Abdulrahim. 2021. AI Emerges as Crucial Tool for Groups Seeking Justice for Syria War Crimes. The Wall Street Journal (2021). https://www.wsj.com/articles/ai-emerges-as-crucial-tool-for-groups-seeking-justice-for-syria-war-crimes-11613228401Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jorge A Ahumada, Eric Fegraus, Tanya Birch, Nicole Flores, Roland Kays, Timothy G O'Brien, Jonathan Palmer, Stephanie Schuttler, Jennifer Y Zhao, Walter Jetz, et al. 2020. Wildlife insights: A platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and other passive sensor wildlife data for the planet. Environmental Conservation, Vol. 47, 1 (2020), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Michele Avanzo, Joseph Stancanello, and Issam El Naqa. 2017. Beyond imaging: the promise of radiomics. Physica Medica, Vol. 38 (2017), 122--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. N. Baker, H. Lu, Gennady Erlikhman, and P. Kellman. 2020. Local features and global shape information in object classification by deep convolutional neural networks. Vision Research, Vol. 172 (2020), 46--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andriy I Bandos, Howard E Rockette, and David Gur. 2013. Subject-centered free-response ROC (FROC) analysis. Medical physics, Vol. 40, 5 (2013), 051706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Shimaa Baraka, Benjamin Akera, Bibek Aryal, Tenzing Sherpa, Finu Shresta, Anthony Ortiz, Kris Sankaran, Juan Lavista Ferres, Mir Matin, and Yoshua Bengio. 2020. Machine Learning for Glacier Monitoring in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.05013 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sara Beery, Yang Liu, Dan Morris, Jim Piavis, Ashish Kapoor, Neel Joshi, Markus Meister, and Pietro Perona. 2020. Synthetic examples improve generalization for rare classes. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. 863--873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sara Beery, Grant Van Horn, and Pietro Perona. 2018. Recognition in Terra Incognita. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Munich, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bettina Berendt. 2019. AI for the Common Good?! Pitfalls, challenges, and ethics pen-testing. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, Vol. 10, 1 (2019), 44--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Roderic Broadhurst. 2020. Child sex abuse images and exploitation materials. In The Human Factor of Cybercrime, Rutger Leukfeldt and Thomas J. Holt (Eds.). Routledge, 310--336.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mauro Castelli, Leonardo Vanneschi, and Alevs Popovivc. 2015. Predicting burned areas of forest fires: an artificial intelligence approach. Fire ecology, Vol. 11, 1 (2015), 106--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowik Chanussot, Abhishek Das, Siddharth Goyal, Thibaut Lavril, Muhammed Shuaibi, Morgane Riviere, Kevin Tran, Javier Heras-Domingo, Caleb Ho, Weihua Hu, et al. 2020. The Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) Dataset and Community Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.09990 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nan-Chen Chen, Margaret Drouhard, Rafal Kocielnik, Jina Suh, and Cecilia R Aragon. 2018. Using machine learning to support qualitative coding in social science: Shifting the focus to ambiguity. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), Vol. 8, 2 (2018), 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Michael Chui, James Manyika, and Mehdi Miremadi. 2018. What AI can and can't do (yet) for your business. McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 1 (2018), 97--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jim Collins. 2019. Turning the flywheel: a monograph to accompany good to great .Random House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Josh Cowls, Thomas King, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2019. Designing AI for social good: Seven essential factors. SSRN 3388669 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fei Fang, Thanh Hong Nguyen, Rob Pickles, Wai Y Lam, Gopalasamy R Clements, Bo An, Amandeep Singh, Milind Tambe, Andrew Lemieux, et al. 2016. Deploying PAWS: Field Optimization of the Protection Assistant for Wildlife Security.. In AAAI, Vol. 16. 3966--3973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Fei Fang, Milind Tambe, Bistra Dilkina, and Andrew J Plumptre. 2019. Artificial intelligence and conservation .Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Salvador Garc'ia, Julián Luengo, and Francisco Herrera. 2015. Data preprocessing in data mining .Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Robert Geirhos, Patricia Rubisch, Claudio Michaelis, Matthias Bethge, Felix A. Wichmann, and Wieland Brendel. 2019. ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. In International Conference on Learning Representations .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Shahrzad Gholami, Narendran Kodandapani, Jane Wang, and Juan M. Lavista Ferres. 2021. Where there's Smoke, there's Fire: Wildfire Risk Predictive Modeling via Historical Climate Data. In Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI) .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Shahrzad Gholami, Sara Mc Carthy, Bistra Dilkina, Andrew J Plumptre, Milind Tambe, Margaret Driciru, Fred Wanyama, Aggrey Rwetsiba, Mustapha Nsubaga, Joshua Mabonga, et al. 2018. Adversary Models Account for Imperfect Crime Data: Forecasting and Planning against Real-world Poachers. In AAMAS. 823--831.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Carla Gomes, Thomas Dietterich, Christopher Barrett, Jon Conrad, Bistra Dilkina, Stefano Ermon, Fei Fang, Andrew Farnsworth, Alan Fern, Xiaoli Fern, et al. 2019. Computational sustainability: Computing for a better world and a sustainable future. Commun. ACM, Vol. 62, 9 (2019), 56--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Noel Gorelick, Matt Hancher, Mike Dixon, Simon Ilyushchenko, David Thau, and Rebecca Moore. 2017. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote sensing of Environment, Vol. 202 (2017), 18--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ben Green. 2019. "Good" isn't good enough. In Proceedings of the AI for Social Good workshop at NeurIPS .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Saul Greenberg. 2020. Automated Image Recognition for Wildlife Camera Traps: Making it Work for You. Technical Report. Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ritwik Gupta, Bryce Goodman, Nirav Patel, Ricky Hosfelt, Sandra Sajeev, Eric Heim, Jigar Doshi, Keane Lucas, Howie Choset, and Matthew Gaston. 2019. Creating xBD: A Dataset for Assessing Building Damage from Satellite Imagery. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanxiang Hao, Sriram Baireddy, Emily R Bartusiak, Latisha Konz, Kevin LaTourette, Michael Gribbons, Moses Chan, Mary L Comer, and Edward J Delp. 2020. An Attention-Based System for Damage Assessment Using Satellite Imagery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06643 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jamie Hayes, Luca Melis, George Danezis, and Emiliano De Cristofaro. 2019. LOGAN: Membership inference attacks against generative models. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Vol. 2019, 1 (2019), 133--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Fred Hohman, Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Mary Beth Kery, and Kayur Patel. 2020. Understanding and Visualizing Data Iteration in Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Anjali Jaiswal and Madhura Joshi. 2020. Climate Action: All Eyes on India. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/anjali-jaiswal/climate-action-all-eyes-indiaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Bargav Jayaraman, Lingxiao Wang, David Evans, and Quanquan Gu. 2020. Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10881 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W Matthew Davis, David B Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2016. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science, Vol. 353, 6301 (2016), 790--794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Alexandre Lacoste, Alexandra Luccioni, Victor Schmidt, and Thomas Dandres. 2019. Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09700 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Maxime Lenormand, Sylvie Huet, Floriana Gargiulo, and Guillaume Deffuant. 2012. A Universal Model of Commuting Networks. PLoS ONE, Vol. 7, 10 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Xiyang Liu, Yixi Xu, Sumit Mukherjee, and Juan Lavista Ferres. 2020. MACE: A Flexible Framework for Membership Privacy Estimation in Generative Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.05683 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Gary Marcus. 2019. An Epidemic of AI Misinformation. The Gradient (2019). https://thegradient.pub/an-epidemic-of-ai-misinformation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. D Douglas Miller and Eric W Brown. 2018. Artificial intelligence in medical practice: the question to the answer? The American journal of medicine, Vol. 131, 2 (2018), 129--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Jared Moore. 2019. AI for not bad. Frontiers in Big Data, Vol. 2 (2019), 32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sumit Mukherjee, Yixi Xu, Anusua Trivedi, and Juan Lavista Ferres. 2019. Protecting GANs against privacy attacks by preventing overfitting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.00071 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Md Nasir, Brian Baucom, Panayiotis Georgiou, and Shrikanth Narayanan. 2015. Redundancy analysis of behavioral coding for couples therapy and improved estimation of behavior from noisy annotations. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 1886--1890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Md Nasir, Brian R Baucom, Craig J Bryan, Shrikanth S Narayanan, and Panayiotis G Georgiou. 2017. Complexity in Speech and its Relation to Emotional Bond in Therapist-Patient Interactions During Suicide Risk Assessment Interviews.. In INTERSPEECH. 3296--3300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Mohammad Sadegh Norouzzadeh, Anh Nguyen, Margaret Kosmala, Alexandra Swanson, Meredith S. Palmer, Craig Packer, and Jeff Clune. 2018. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Felipe Oviedo, Zekun Ren, Xue Hansong, Siyu Isaac Parker Tian, Kaicheng Zhang, Mariya Layurova, Thomas Heumueller, Ning Li, Erik Birgersson, Shijing Sun, et al. 2020. Bridging the gap between photovoltaics R&D and manufacturing with data-driven optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13599 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Kasey Panetta. 2020. 5 Trends Drive the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2020. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-trends-drive-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2020/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Clionadh Raleigh, Andrew Linke, Håvard Hegre, and Joakim Karlsen. 2010. Introducing ACLED: an armed conflict location and event dataset: special data feature. Journal of peace research, Vol. 47, 5 (2010), 651--660.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Vikas C Raykar, Shipeng Yu, Linda H Zhao, Gerardo Hermosillo Valadez, Charles Florin, Luca Bogoni, and Linda Moy. 2010. Learning from crowds. Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 11, 4 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Zekun Ren, Felipe Oviedo, Maung Thway, Siyu IP Tian, Yue Wang, Hansong Xue, Jose Dario Perea, Mariya Layurova, Thomas Heumueller, Erik Birgersson, et al. 2020. Embedding physics domain knowledge into a Bayesian network enables layer-by-layer process innovation for photovoltaics. npj Computational Materials, Vol. 6, 1 (2020), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Caleb Robinson and Bistra Dilkina. 2018. A machine learning approach to modeling human migration. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Caleb Robinson, Le Hou, Kolya Malkin, Rachel Soobitsky, Jacob Czawlytko, Bistra Dilkina, and Nebojsa Jojic. 2019 a. Large scale high-resolution land cover mapping with multi-resolution data. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 12726--12735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Caleb Robinson, Anthony Ortiz, Kolya Malkin, Blake Elias, Andi Peng, Dan Morris, Bistra Dilkina, and Nebojsa Jojic. 2019 b. Human-Machine Collaboration for Fast Land Cover Mapping. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.04176 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Marcos Rodrigues and Juan de la Riva. 2014. An insight into machine-learning algorithms to model human-caused wildfire occurrence. Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 57 (2014), 192--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. David Rolnick, Priya L Donti, Lynn H Kaack, Kelly Kochanski, Alexandre Lacoste, Kris Sankaran, Andrew Slavin Ross, Nikola Milojevic-Dupont, Natasha Jaques, Anna Waldman-Brown, et al. 2019. Tackling climate change with machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05433 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Mohammad Sadegh Norouzzadeh, Dan Morris, Sara Beery, Neel Joshi, Nebojsa Jojic, and Jeff Clune. 2019. A deep active learning system for species identification and counting in camera trap images. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Youssef Safi and Abdelaziz Bouroumi. 2013. Prediction of forest fires using artificial neural networks. Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 7, 6 (2013), 271--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Nithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong, Praveen Kumar Paritosh, and Lora Mois Aroyo. 2021. "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Stefan Schneider, Saul Greenberg, Graham W Taylor, and Stefan C Kremer. 2020. Three critical factors affecting automated image species recognition performance for camera traps. Ecology and evolution, Vol. 10, 7 (2020), 3503--3517.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Daniel Sheldon, Andrew Farnsworth, Jed W Irvine, Benjamin Van Doren, Kevin F Webb, Thomas G Dietterich, and Steve Kelling. 2013. Approximate Bayesian inference for reconstructing velocities of migrating birds from weather radar. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Tao Sheng, Chen Feng, Shaojie Zhuo, Xiaopeng Zhang, Liang Shen, and Mickey Aleksic. 2018. A quantization-friendly separable convolution for mobilenets. In 2018 1st Workshop on Energy Efficient Machine Learning and Cognitive Computing for Embedded Applications (EMC2). IEEE, 14--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Zheyuan Ryan Shi, Claire Wang, and Fei Fang. 2020. Artificial intelligence for social good: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.01818 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Reza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, and Vitaly Shmatikov. 2017. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. 2019. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Shijing Sun, Armi Tiihonen, Felipe Oviedo, Zhe Liu, Janak Thapa, Noor Titan Putri Hartono, Anuj Goyal, Clio Batali, Alex Encinas, Jason Yoo, et al. 2021. A Physical Data Fusion Approach to Optimize Compositional Stability of Halide Perovskites. Matter (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Saeid Asgari Taghanaki, Yefeng Zheng, S Kevin Zhou, Bogdan Georgescu, Puneet Sharma, Daguang Xu, Dorin Comaniciu, and Ghassan Hamarneh. 2019. Combo loss: Handling input and output imbalance in multi-organ segmentation. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 75 (2019), 24--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Erik Trautman. 2018. The Virtuous Cycle of AI Products. https://www.eriktrautman.com/posts/the-virtuous-cycle-of-ai-productsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Anusua Trivedi, Sumit Mukherjee, Edmund Tse, Anne Ewing, and Juan Lavista Ferres. 2019. Risks of Using Non-verified Open Data: A case study on using Machine Learning techniques for predicting Pregnancy Outcomes in India. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02136 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Tinka Valentijn, Jacopo Margutti, Marc van den Homberg, and Jorma Laaksonen. 2020. Multi-Hazard and Spatial Transferability of a CNN for Automated Building Damage Assessment. Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, 17 (2020), 2839.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Adam Van Etten, Dave Lindenbaum, and Todd M Bacastow. 2018. Spacenet: A remote sensing dataset and challenge series. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.01232 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Ricardo Vinuesa, Hossein Azizpour, Iolanda Leite, Madeline Balaam, Virginia Dignum, Sami Domisch, Anna Fell"ander, Simone Daniela Langhans, Max Tegmark, and Francesco Fuso Nerini. 2020. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature communications, Vol. 11, 1 (2020), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Randi Vita, Swapnil Mahajan, James A Overton, Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Sheridan Martini, Jason R Cantrell, Daniel K Wheeler, Alessandro Sette, and Bjoern Peters. 2019. The immune epitope database (IEDB): 2018 update. Nucleic acids research, Vol. 47, D1 (2019), D339--D343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Kiri Wagstaff. 2012. Machine learning that matters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.4656 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Sherrie Wang, William Chen, Sang Michael Xie, George Azzari, and David B Lobell. 2020. Weakly supervised deep learning for segmentation of remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, 2 (2020), 207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Ben G Weinstein. 2018. A computer vision for animal ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 87, 3 (2018), 533--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Christine T Wolf. 2020. Democratizing AI? experience and accessibility in the age of artificial intelligence. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, Vol. 26, 4 (2020), 12--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Carole-Jean Wu, David Brooks, Kevin Chen, Douglas Chen, Sy Choudhury, Marat Dukhan, Kim Hazelwood, Eldad Isaac, Yangqing Jia, Bill Jia, et al. 2019. Machine learning at facebook: Understanding inference at the edge. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA). IEEE, 331--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Liyang Xie, Kaixiang Lin, Shu Wang, Fei Wang, and Jiayu Zhou. 2018. Differentially private generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06739 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Lily Xu, Shahrzad Gholami, Sara Mc Carthy, Bistra Dilkina, Andrew Plumptre, Milind Tambe, Rohit Singh, Mustapha Nsubuga, Joshua Mabonga, Margaret Driciru, et al. 2020. Stay Ahead of Poachers: Illegal Wildlife Poaching Prediction and Patrol Planning Under Uncertainty with Field Test Evaluations (Short Version). In 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 1898--1901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Amir Hossein Yazdavar, Hussein S Al-Olimat, Monireh Ebrahimi, Goonmeet Bajaj, Tanvi Banerjee, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, Jyotishman Pathak, and Amit Sheth. 2017. Semi-supervised approach to monitoring clinical depressive symptoms in social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. 1191--1198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. John R Zech, Marcus A Badgeley, Manway Liu, Anthony B Costa, Joseph J Titano, and Eric Karl Oermann. 2018. Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: a cross-sectional study. PLoS medicine, Vol. 15, 11 (2018), e1002683.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2018. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. National Science Review, Vol. 5, 1 (2018), 44--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Becoming Good at AI for Good

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AIES '21: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
          July 2021
          1077 pages
          ISBN:9781450384735
          DOI:10.1145/3461702

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 July 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate61of162submissions,38%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader