skip to main content
10.1145/3461778.3462034acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

“It’s like a GPS community tool”: Tactics to foster Digital Commons through Artifact Ecology

Published:28 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital Commons have been widely studied in HCI and co-design literature as an alternative to technologies produced by capitalistic corporations. In this paper, we present an action-research process that facilitates the use of digital commons among a group of participants. The process core aspect is understanding our participants’ interests and values to present multiple off-the-shelf tools fitting their needs. In doing so, we leveraged on Artifact Ecologies, using them as an action-research tool. The process is articulated in three main phases: 1) we engaged participants in a reflection on their Artifact Ecologies, connecting the artifacts in use to their values; 2) we used these results to selected valuable digital commons; 3) we presented these tools to the group, connecting them to participants’ ecologies. At the end of the process, we performed a collective interview to evaluate the process alongside assessing the adoption of the proposed technologies. Based on our findings, we developed five tactics to foster digital commoning.

References

  1. 2014. AICEP 2014 report. Retrieved April 25, 2021 from https://www.portugalglobal.pt/EN/InvestInPortugal/RegionsofPortugal/Pages/TheRegionsofPortugal.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018. INE 2018. Retrieved April 25, 2021 from https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_destaques&DESTAQUESdest_boui=354096372&DESTAQUESmodo=2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2019. EUROSTAT 2019 - At-risk-of-poverty rate by NUTS 2 regions. Retrieved April 25, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tgs00103/default/table?lang=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2019. EUROSTAT 2019 - Population by educational attainment level, sex and NUTS 2 regions. Retrieved April 25, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/edat_lfse_04/default/table?lang=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gabriela Avram, Jaz Hee jeong Choi, Stefano De Paoli, Ann Light, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2019. Repositioning CoDesign in the age of platform capitalism: from sharing to caring. CoDesign 15, 3 (2019), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1638063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chiara Bassetti, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, Maurizio Teli, Stefano De Paoli, and Antonella De Angeli. 2019. Co-designing for common values: creating hybrid spaces to nurture autonomous cooperation. CoDesign 15, 3 (2019), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1637897Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yochai Benkler. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lauren Berlant. 2016. The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times*. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34, 3 (2016), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816645989Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2012. Dynamics in Artifact Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (Copenhagen, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399085Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Susanne Bødker, Peter Lyle, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2017. Untangling the Mess of Technological Artifacts: Investigating Community Artifact Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Troyes, France) (C&T ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083675Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sander Bogers, Janne van Kollenburg, Eva Deckers, Joep Frens, and Caroline Hummels. 2018. A Situated Exploration of Designing for Personal Health Ecosystems through Data-Enabled Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Andrea Botero, Sanna Marttila, Giacomo Poderi, Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Anna Seravalli, Maurizio Teli, and Frederick M.C van Amstel. 2020. COMMONING DESIGN AND DESIGNING COMMONS. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2 (Manizales, Colombia) (PDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 5 (2015), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Susanne Bødker and ClemensNylandsted Klokmose. 2013. The human–artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human-Computer Interaction 26, 4 (2013), 315–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.626709Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2012. Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (New York, NY, USA, 2012-10-14) (NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399085Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Andrea Capaccioli, Giacomo Poderi, Mela Bettega, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2016. Participatory Infrastructuring of Community Energy. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2 (Aarhus, Denmark) (PDC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948076.2948089Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Andrea Capaccioli, Giacomo Poderi, Mela Bettega, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2017. Exploring participatory energy budgeting as a policy instrument to foster energy justice. In Energy PolicyElsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.055Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Roberto Cibin, Sarah Robinson, Nicola J. Bidwell, Conor Linehan, Maye Laura, Nadia Pantidi, and Maurizio Teli. 2021. Land, Water and Sun: Tuning into Socio-Ecological Relations in Radio Design. In Accepted for pubblictaion in Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS 2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nazli Cila, Gabriele Ferri, Martijn de Waal, Inte Gloerich, and Tara Karpinski. 2020. The Blockchain and the Commons: Dilemmas in the Design of Local Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376660Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hamid Ekbia and Bonnie Nardi. 2015. The Political Economy of Computing: The Elephant in the HCI Room. Interactions 22, 6 (Oct. 2015), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hamid R Ekbia and Bonnie A Nardi. 2017. Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kristofer Erickson, Felix Rodriguez Perez, and Jesus Rodriguez Perez. 2018. What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery by Observing Downstream Use. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (Paris, France) (OpenSym ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233391.3233533Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. James J Gibson. 2014. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. David Hakken, Maurizio Teli, and Barbara Andrews. 2015. Beyond Capital: Values, Commons, Computing, and the Search for a Viable Future. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom. 2007. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. From Theory to Practice.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Heekyoung Jung, Erik Stolterman, Will Ryan, Tonya Thompson, and Marty Siegel. 2008. Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life?. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges (New York, NY, USA, 2008-10-20) (NordiCHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463160.1463182Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Bran Knowles, Lynne Blair, Paul Coulton, and Mark Lochrie. 2014. Rethinking Plan A for Sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3593–3596. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557311Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ida Larsen-Ledet, Henrik Korsgaard, and Susanne Bødker. 2020. Collaborative Writing Across Multiple Artifact Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Christopher A Le Dantec. 2016. Designing publics. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Peter Lyle, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jennifer C. Mankoff, Eli Blevis, Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Susan R. Fussell, Jay Hasbrouck, Allison Woodruff, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. Environmental Sustainability and Interaction. In CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA, USA) (CHI EA ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2121–2124. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1240963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sanna Marttila and Andrea Botero. 2017. Infrastructuring for cultural commons. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 1-2 (2017), 97–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9273-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sanna Marttila, Andrea Botero, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2014. Towards Commons Design in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts - Volume 2 (Windhoek, Namibia) (PDC ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Sanna Marttila, Elisabet M Nilsson, and Anna Seravalli. 2014. Opening Production: Design and Commons. In Making futures: marginal notes on innovation, design, and democracy Pelle Ehn, Elisabet M. Nilsson and Richard Topgaard (eds.). MIT Press, 87–98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Raul Masu, Mela Bettega, Nuno N. Correia, Teresa Romão, and Fabio Morreale. 2019. ARCAA: A Framework to Analyse the Artefact Ecology in Computer Music Performance. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (Braga, Portugal) (ARTECH 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 25, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359852.3359870Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Raul Masu, Nuno N. Correia, Stephan Jurgens, Jochen Feitsch, and Teresa Romão. 2020. Designing Interactive Sonic Artefacts for Dance Performance: An Ecological Approach. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Audio Mostly (Graz, Austria) (AM ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411109.3412297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Raul Masu, Adam Pultz Melbye, John Sullivan, and Alexander Refsum Jensenius. 2021. NIME and the Environment: Toward a More Sustainable NIME Practice. In Accepted for pubblictaion in Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Gaia Mosconi, Matthias Korn, Christian Reuter, Peter Tolmie, Maurizio Teli, and Volkmar Pipek. 2017. From facebook to the neighbourhood: Infrastructuring of hybrid community engagement. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 4 (2017), 959–1003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Elinor Ostrom. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Giacomo Poderi. 2019. Sustaining platforms as commons: perspectives on participation, infrastructure, and governance. CoDesign 15, 3 (2019), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631351Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Rebecca Price, Cara Wrigley, and Judy Matthews. 0. Action researcher to design innovation catalyst: Building design capability from within. Action Research 0, 0 (0), 1476750318781221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318781221Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B Skov, and Jeni Paay. 2014. What is a digital ecology? Theoretical foundations and a unified definition. Australian Journal of Intelligent Information Processing Systems 13, 4(2014), 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Andrea Resmini and Luca Rosati. 2009. Information Architecture for Ubiquitous Ecologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (France) (MEDES ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 29, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1643823.1643859Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Ieda M. Santos, Nagla Ali, and Anthony Hill. 2016. Students as Co-designers of a Virtual Learning Commons: Results of a Collaborative Action Research Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 42, 1 (2016), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Lyle Peter, and Teli Maurizio. 2018. Fostering Commonfare. Entanglements Between Participatory Design and Feminism. Proceedings of DRS, Vol. 2. Loughborough University, 458–471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Anna Seravalli. 2014. Making Commons: attempts at composing prospects in the opening of production. Ph.D. Dissertation. Malmö University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Anna Seravalli. 2018. Infrastructuring Urban Commons over Time: Learnings from Two Cases. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (Hasselt and Genk, Belgium) (PDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Saul Shiffman, Arthur A. Stone, and Michael R. Hufford. 2008. Ecological Momentary Assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4, 1 (2008), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Nick Srnicek. 2017. Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Angelika Strohmayer, Jenn Clamen, and Mary Laing. 2019. Technologies for Social Justice: Lessons from Sex Workers on the Front Lines. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2019-05-02) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300882Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Maurizio Teli, Silvia Bordin, María Menéndez Blanco, Giusi Orabona, and Antonella De Angeli. 2015. Public design of digital commons in urban places: A case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 81 (2015), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.02.003 Transdisciplinary Approaches to Urban Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Maurizio Teli, Angela Di Fiore, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2017. Computing and the common: a case of Participatory Design with think tanks. CoDesign 13, 2 (2017), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1309439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Maurizio Teli, Marcus Foth, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Irina Anastasiu, and Peter Lyle. 2020. Tales of Institutioning and Commoning: Participatory Design Processes with a Strategic and Tactical Perspective. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 (Manizales, Colombia) (PDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Maurizio Teli, Peter Lyle, and Mariacristina Sciannamblo. 2018. Institutioning the Common: The Case of Commonfare. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (Hasselt and Genk, Belgium) (PDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210590Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Maurizio Teli, Linda Tonolli, Angela Di Fiore, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2019. Computing and the common. Learning from Participatory Design in the age of platform capitalism.Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3228359Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Austin L. Toombs. 2017. Hackerspace Tropes, Identities, and Community Values. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064760Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    June 2021
    2082 pages
    ISBN:9781450384766
    DOI:10.1145/3461778

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '24
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 1 - 5, 2024
    IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format