skip to main content
10.1145/3461778.3462117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Speculative Design for Education: Using Participatory Methods to Map Design Challenges and Opportunities in Pakistan

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The global education landscape continues to be disrupted by COVID-19. The unique circumstances created by this crisis has led to unexpected opportunities to leverage innovative uses of technologies that can radically innovate education service delivery. We map out the context of Pakistan – a country where challenges pertaining to both access to education and quality learning predate the pandemic. A context largely under explored in design and HCI research. This paper presents insights from conversations with 21 stakeholders across 15 design activities, that were structured around speculative design proposals to collaboratively envision the future of education in Pakistan. The paper offers directions for the design of EdTech through a plural, and culturally rooted speculative discussion, highlighting (1) opportunities and considerations for localising design for education, and (2) reframing the value of education in Pakistan.

References

  1. Amna Abid and Suleman Shahid. 2017. Helping Pregnant Women in the Rural Areas of Pakistan using a Low-cost Interactive System. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ACM, Lahore Pakistan, 1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3136560.3136607Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad, Maira Abid, Muhammad Shahrukh, Yashfa Iftikhar, Tayyaba Zainab, Syeda Maria Hussain, and Suleman Shahid. 2020. Video: Learning Traffic Rules with a Social Robot in Pakistan. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 637. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tallal Ahmad, Amna Batool, M. Salman Khalid, and Samia Ibtasam. 2017. Scrolling, Navigation, and Selection: How New Smartphone Users discover it. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ACM, Lahore Pakistan, 1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3136560.3136606Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Adeel Ahmed. 2021. Dear Cannoli, poking fun at an employee over their English is not “banter” — a privilege check is overdue. Images. Retrieved April 23, 2021 from https://images.dawn.com/news/1186436Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Haider Ali Akmal and Paul Coulton. 2020. A Tarot of Things:a supernatural approach to designing for IoT. In Proceedings DRS 2020. AUS. Retrieved September 16, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.188Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Haider Akmal and Paul Coulton. 2020. The Divination of Things by Things. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381823Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Syed Ali, Harris Durrani, Muhammad Naeem, Waleed Riaz, and Suleman Shahid. 2016. Supporting Pakistani Farmers Through Digital Means: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’16, ACM Press, San Jose, California, USA, 2299–2305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892527Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Waqar Ali. 2020. W11 Tram: When Karachi lived on streets of Melbourne. SBS Urdu. Retrieved January 26, 2021 from https://www.sbs.com.au/language/english/w11-tram-when-karachi-lived-on-streets-of-melbourneGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Safia Anjum and Junwu Chai. 2020. Drivers of Cash-on-Delivery Method of Payment in E-Commerce Shopping: Evidence From Pakistan. SAGE Open 10, 3 (July 2020), 2158244020917392. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020917392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ahmed Ansari. 2019. Global Methods, Local Designs. In The Social Design Reader. Bloomsbury Academic, 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ahmed Ansari. 2019. Decolonizing design through the perspectives of cosmological others: Arguing for an ontological turn in design research and practice. XRDS 26, 2 (November 2019), 16–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3368048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Tehreem Anwar, Arturo Jimenez, Arsalan Bin Najeeb, Bishakha Upadhyaya, and Monica M. McGill. 2020. Exploring the Enacted Computing Curriculum in K-12 Schools in South Asia: Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ACM, Virtual Event New Zealand, 79–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406251Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Payal Arora. 2019. The next billion users: Digital life beyond the West. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Asian Development Bank. 2019. School Education in Pakistan: A Sector Assessment. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved September 17, 2020 from https://www.adb.org/documents/pakistan-school-education-sector-assessmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Muhammad Asim, Fahad Shamshad, Muhammad Awais, and Ali Ahmed. 2017. Introducing Data mining for Predicting trends in School Education of Pakistan: Preliminary results and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3136560.3136597Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1 (2013), 11–35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yaser Awan, Faisal Sherjan, and Salwa Akhtar. 2021. Design Thinking Workshop in Madrassah. Retrieved January 27, 2021 from https://www.linkedin.com/posts/yaserawan_designthinkingworkshop-sustainabladvisory-ugcPost-6757943863970725889-EifV/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alyssa Ayres. 2009. Speaking like a state: Language and nationalism in Pakistan. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. AzCorp Entertainment. 2021. AzCorp Entertainment | A For-Profit Social Enterprise. Retrieved February 3, 2021 from https://www.azcorpentertainment.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nashra Balagamwala. 2020. Arranged! Nashra Balagamwala. Retrieved July 8, 2020 from http://nashra.co/#/arranged/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nashra Balagamwala. 2020. Paltering Politicians. Nashra Balagamwala. Retrieved July 8, 2020 from http://nashra.co/#/paltering-politicians/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Eevi E. Beck. 2002. P for political - participation is not enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, (2002), 77–92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Anas Bilal, Aimal Rextin, Ahmad Kakakhel, and Mehwish Nasim. 2017. Roman-txt: forms and functions of roman urdu texting. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, Vienna Austria, 1–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098552Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Thomas Binder and Johan Redström. 2006. Exemplary design research. In Design Research Society Wonderground International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hasnain Bokhari and Grigoriy Grigoryev. 2017. Creating Knowledge Societies: Enabling Digital Literacy with Raspberry Pi in Tribal Area of Pakistan. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV ’17, ACM Press, New Delhi AA, India, 560–561. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Eva Brandt. 2006. Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design? In Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1 (PDC ’06), Association for Computing Machinery, Trento, Italy, 57–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1147261.1147271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Eric Brewer, Michael Demmer, Bowei Du, Melissa Ho, Matthew Kam, Sergiu Nedevschi, Joyojeet Pal, Rabin Patra, Sonesh Surana, and Kevin Fall. 2005. The case for technology in developing regions. Computer 38, 6 (2005), 25–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, PMLR, 77–91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. 2021. Archaeological Ruins at Moenjodaro. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved April 27, 2021 from https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/138/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Paul Coulton, Joseph Galen Lindley, Miriam Sturdee, and Michael Stead. 2017. Design fiction as world building. In Proceedings of Research through Design Conference 2017, GBR. Retrieved January 29, 2021 from https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/83974/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Dawn. 2019. Christian Louboutin just reinvented Peshawari chappals and he's calling them “Imran sandals.” Images. Retrieved April 27, 2021 from https://images.dawn.com/news/1182151Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Dawn. 2021. Out-of-school children. DAWN.COM. Retrieved April 25, 2021 from https://www.dawn.com/news/1611868Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicola Dell and Neha Kumar. 2016. The Ins and Outs of HCI for Development. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, San Jose California USA, 2220–2232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858081Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Dot & Line. 2021. Dot & Line | After-School Math Education Across Pakistan. Dot & Line. Retrieved February 5, 2021 from https://dotandlinelearning.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Paul Dourish and Scott D. Mainwaring. 2012. Ubicomp's colonial impulse. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’12), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 133–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press. Retrieved June 14, 2017 from https://muse-jhu-edu.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/book/28148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Easypaisa. 2021. Home Easypaisa. Easypaisa. Retrieved February 5, 2021 from https://easypaisa.com.pk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Edkasa. 2021. Edkasa | Join Pakistan's Most Innovative Learning Platform. Edkasa. Retrieved February 3, 2021 from https://edkasa.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Taqi Shaheen Eds. Annelys De Vet. 2018. Subjective Atlas of Pakistan. Subjective Editions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Pelle Ehn. 1988. Playing the language-games of design and use-on skill and participation. SIGOIS Bull. 9, 2–3 (April 1988), 142–157. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/966861.45426Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Neelam Ejaz, Neha Ravail Khaliq, and Yahya Bajwa. 2021. COVID-19 spurs big changes in Pakistan's education. Retrieved February 11, 2021 from https://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/covid-19-spurs-big-changes-pakistans-educationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Arturo Escobar. 2017. Response: Design for/by [and from] the ‘global South.’ Design Philosophy Papers 15, 1 (2017), 39–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Arturo Escobar. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ethnologue. 2016. Languages of Pakistan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Christiane Floyd, Wolf-Michael Mehl, Fanny-Michaela Reisin, Gerhard Schmidt, and Gregor Wolf. 1989. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, 4 (December 1989), 253–350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0404_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. H. E. Gelani, F. Dastgeer, M. Umair, M. Umar, J. Hussain, and R. Danyal. 2018. Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) in Pakistan: Effects and Way Forward. In 2018 International Conference on Power Generation Systems and Renewable Energy Technologies (PGSRET), 1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/PGSRET.2018.8685985Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Koen Geven and Amer Hasan. 2020. Learning Losses in Pakistan Due to COVID-19 School Closures. World Bank, Washington, DC. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1596/34659Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Google. 2021. Professional Certificate Training Programs. Grow With Google. Retrieved April 22, 2021 from https://grow.google/certificates/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Shumyle Haider and Maham Bosan. 2015. Monopoly of Lahore. Behance - Monopoly of LAhore. Retrieved January 28, 2021 from https://www.behance.net/shumyle72Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Maria Huusko, Yiying Wu, and Virpi Roto. 2018. Structuring and Engaging – The Roles of Design Fictions in a Co-design Workshop. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction - OZCHI ’18, ACM Press, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 234–241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Invest2Innovate. 2020. COVID-19 & its Impact on Pakistani Startups. Retrieved September 15, 2020 from https://invest2innovate.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/COVID-19-and-Startups_-Pivots-Partnerships-and-Future-Positioning-2.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Muhammad Zahid Iqbal and Abraham G. Campbell. 2021. Covid-19 and challenges for learning-technology adoption in Pakistan. interactions 28, 2 (March 2021), 8–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3450232Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. Tangible Bits: Beyond Pixels. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI ’08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, xv–xxv. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1347390.1347392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. ITA. 2021. Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi | Education | Education in Pakistan | Equity | Inclusion. Retrieved February 11, 2021 from http://itacec.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Safyan Jabbar and Saheem Khizar. 2013. ASER Baithaks, Village Level Community Meetings. Retrieved January 27, 2021 from http://chalkboard.tol.org/aser-baithaks-village-level-community-meetings-a-key-to-sensitize-communities-of-the-importance-of-quality-education/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. KarMuqabla. 2021. KarMuqabla: Education and distance learning gaming platform. Retrieved February 3, 2021 from https://www.karmuqabla.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Awais Hameed Khan, Scott Heiner, and Ben Matthews. 2019. Disconnect: A Proposal for Reclaiming Control in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, LBW1319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Awais Hameed Khan, Stephen Snow, Scott Heiner, Robert Hardgrove, Sarah Matthews, and Ben Matthews. 2020. The Politics of Materiality: Exploring Participatory Design Tools, Methods & Practices. In DRS2020 Synergy, Brisbane, Australia. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Awais Hameed Khan, Stephen Snow, Scott Heiner, and Ben Matthews. 2020. Disconnecting: Towards a Semiotic Framework for Personal Data Trails. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. K. A. Khan. 1981. The Mosque schools in Pakistan: an experiment in integrating nonformal and formal education - UNESCO Digital Library. Retrieved January 27, 2021 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000070267Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Knowledge Platform. 2021. https://www.knowledgeplatform.com.pk/. Retrieved February 3, 2021 from https://www.knowledgeplatform.com.pk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Morten Kyng and Lars Mathiassen. 1979. Systems development and trade union activities. Computer Science Department, Aarhus University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Ezio Manzini. 2009. A cosmopolitan localism: Prospects for a sustainable local development and the possible role of design. In Design Studies: A Reader, Hazel Clark and David Brody (eds.). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Elin Martínez (Ed.). 2018. “Shall I feed my daughter, or educate her?”: barriers to girls’ education in Pakistan. Human Rights Watch, New York, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Luiza Prado de O. Martins. 2014. Privilege and oppression: Towards a feminist speculative design. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Robb Mitchell. 2011. Scaffolding Co-Design with an Amateur Quality Comic. In Nordic Design Research Conference 2011, Helsinki, 9. Retrieved from www.nordes.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Robb Mitchell and Mie Nørgaard. 2011. Using DIY cartoon storyboards, live sketching and co-sketching to involve young and older users in participatory design. In Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th World Conference on Design Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Brendan Mounter. 2017. Robotics the latest tool in teaching lost languages. Retrieved January 26, 2021 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-01/opie-the-robot-helping-preserve-ancient-aboriginal-languages/9108248Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. National Assembly of Pakistan. 2010. Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010. Retrieved February 2, 2021 from http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/amendments/18amendment.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Nadia Naviwala. 2016. Pakistan's Education Crisis: The Real Story. Wilson Centre Asia Program.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Near Future Laboratory. 2020. Design Fiction Design Brief Creation Playing Cards. Near Future Laboratory Shop. Retrieved September 16, 2020 from https://nearfuturelaboratory.myshopify.com/products/design-fiction-product-design-work-kitGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Abbie O'Brien. 2018. How AI is helping preserve Indigenous languages. SBS News. Retrieved January 26, 2021 from https://www.sbs.com.au/news/how-ai-is-helping-preserve-indigenous-languagesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Orenda Project. 2021. Orenda Project. Orenda Project. Retrieved February 5, 2021 from http://www.orendaproject.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Victor Papanek and R. Buckminster Fuller. 1972. Design for the real world. Thames and Hudson London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Timnit Gebru, Margaret Mitchell, Joy Buolamwini, Joonseok Lee, and Emily Denton. 2020. Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, ACM, New York NY USA, 145–151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375820Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Horst WJ Rittel and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155–169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Simon Robinson, Jennifer Pearson, Shashank Ahire, Rini Ahirwar, Bhakti Bhikne, Nimish Maravi, and Matt Jones. 2018. Revisiting ``Hole-in-the-Wall’’ Computing: Private Smart Speakers and Public Slum Settings. (2018), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Robin Roy and James P. Warren. 2019. Card-based design tools: A review and analysis of 155 card decks for designers and designing. Design Studies 63, (July 2019), 125–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Sabaq Muse. 2021. SABAQ – Pakistan's Award-winning Learning Apps for Kids. Retrieved February 3, 2021 from https://sabaq.edu.pk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (March 2008), 5–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Donald A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Jonathan Schultz. 2010. A Baby Incubator Made From Car Parts. Wheels Blog. Retrieved September 17, 2020 from https://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/neonurtures-car-parts-baby-incubator/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Dawood Shah, Nasir Amin, Muhammad Bilal Kakli, Zubair Farooq Piracha, and Muhammad Adeel Zia. 2018. Pakistan Education Statistics 2016-17. Premier Printers, Islamabad. Retrieved September 17, 2020 from http://library.aepam.edu.pk/Books/Pakistan%20Education%20Statistics%202016-17.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Shehri Pakistan. 2020. Separation of Powers. Retrieved July 8, 2020 from https://www.instagram.com/p/B7qX4p7nwxx/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Erik Stolterman. 2008. The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research. International Journal of Design; Taipei 2, 1 (April 2008). Retrieved May 10, 2018 from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/docview/921472711/abstract/14F1CAE4EAF849B4PQ/1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Madeeha Syed. 2014. A chappal of two cities: The £300 Paul Smith surprise. DAWN.COM. Retrieved April 27, 2021 from http://www.dawn.com/news/1092257Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Teach for Pakistan. 2021. Home. iteachforpakistan. Retrieved February 11, 2021 from https://www.iteachforpakistan.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Teach the World Foundation. 2021. Pakistan. Teach the World Foundation. Retrieved February 3, 2021 from https://www.teachtheworldfoundation.com/pakistanGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. TeleTaleem. 2021. Welcome to TeleTaleem | TeleTaleem. Retrieved February 5, 2021 from https://www.teletaleem.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. The Citizens Foundation. 2021. Home Page - TCF - The Citizens Foundation. Retrieved February 11, 2021 from https://www.tcf.org.pk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. The Express Tribune. 2020. Karachi's second street library launched. The Express Tribune. Retrieved January 27, 2021 from http://tribune.com.pk/story/2259715/karachis-second-street-library-launchedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. The World Bank. 2019. Pakistan@100: Shaping the Future. Retrieved April 25, 2021 from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/31335/Pakistanat100Overview.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. UNESCO. 2020. Truck Art - An Instrument of Advocacy. UNESCO. Retrieved January 26, 2021 from https://en.unesco.org/news/truck-art-instrument-advocacyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. UNICEF. 2020. Education: Giving every child the right to education. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/educationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. UNICEF, UNDP, and UNFPA. 2020. Understanding Youth Perceptions of COVID-19 - Pakistan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Aditya Vashistha, Abhinav Garg, Richard Anderson, and Agha Ali Raza. 2019. Threats, Abuses, Flirting, and Blackmail: Gender Inequity in Social Media Voice Forums. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19, ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Anthony Walton. 1999. Technology Versus African-Americans. The Atlantic. Retrieved April 26, 2021 from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1999/01/technology-versus-african-americans/377392/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Matt Ward. 2019. Critical about Critical and Speculative Design. SpeculativeEdu. Retrieved April 22, 2021 from https://speculativeedu.eu/critical-about-critical-and-speculative-design/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. S. A. G. Wensveen, J. P. Djajadiningrat, and C. J. Overbeeke. 2004. Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS ’04, ACM Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Woodrow W. Winchester. 2018. Afrofuturism, inclusion, and the design imagination. interactions 25, 2 (February 2018), 41–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3182655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. World Bank. 2018. Human Capital Index Report. Retrieved September 17, 2020 from https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/hci/HCI_2pager_PAK.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. World Bank. 2019. Ending Learning Poverty: What Will It Take? Retrieved September 16, 2020 from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32553Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Worldometer. 2021. Population by Country (2021) - Worldometer. Retrieved February 2, 2021 from https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Sharon Zacharia. 2020. Pakistan: TeleSchool and Taleem Ghar (Educational TV at Home).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Zahid Zulfiqar. 2019. The Sociological Study of Educational Exclusion of School Age Children in South Punjab (Pakistan). Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS) 39, 3 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Decolonising Design. Retrieved September 16, 2020 from https://www.decolonisingdesign.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Decolonising Design Editorial Statement. Retrieved September 16, 2020 from https://www.decolonisingdesign.com/statements/2016/editorial/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    June 2021
    2082 pages
    ISBN:9781450384766
    DOI:10.1145/3461778

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '24
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 1 - 5, 2024
    IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format