skip to main content
10.1145/3462203.3475886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgooditConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Citizens' Perceived Information Responsibilities and Information Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In crises, citizens show changes in their information behavior, which is mediated by trust in sources, personal relations, online and offline news outlets and information and communication technologies such as apps and social media. Through a repeated one-week survey with closed and open questions of German citizens during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study examines citizens' perceptions of information responsibilities, their satisfaction with the fulfillment of these responsibilities and their wishes for improving the information flow. The study shows that the dynamism of the crisis and the federally varying strategies burden citizens who perceive an obligation to stay informed, but view agencies as responsible for making information readily available. The study contributes a deeper understanding of citizens' needs in crises and discusses implications for design of communication tools for dynamic situations that reduce information overload while fulfilling citizens' desire to stay informed.

References

  1. Douglas G. Altman. 1991. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sandra Appleby-Arnold, Noellie Brockdorff, Laure Fallou, and Rémy Bossu. 2019. Truth, trust, and civic duty: Cultural factors in citizens' perceptions of mobile phone apps and social media in disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 27, 4 (2019), 293--305. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12282Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sandra Appleby-Arnold, Noellie Brockdorff, Ivana Jakovljev, and Sunčica Zdravković. 2020. Disaster preparedness and cultural factors: a comparative study in Romania and Malta. Disasters (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12433Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lucinda Austin, Brooke Fisher Liu, and Yan Jin. 2012. How Audiences Seek Out Crisis Information: Exploring the Social-Mediated Crisis Communication Model. Journal of Applied Communication Research 40, 2 (May 2012), 188--207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.654498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ana I. Bento, Thuy Nguyen, Coady Wing, Felipe Lozano-Rojas, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Kosali Simon. 2020. Evidence from internet search data shows information-seeking responses to news of local COVID-19 cases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 21 (May 2020), 11220--11222. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005335117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bundesregierung. 2020. Warn-App NINA mit lokalen Corona-Regelungen. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/coronavirus/warn-app-nina-1749214Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Myoung-Gi Chon and Hyojung Park. 2021. Predicting Public Support for Government Actions in a Public Health Crisis: Testing Fear, Organization-Public Relationship, and Behavioral Intention in the Framework of the Situational Theory of Problem Solving. Health Communication 36, 4 (Dec. 2021), 476--486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1700439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cory Clark, Andrés Davila, Maxime Regis, and Sascha Kraus. 2020. Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation. Global Transitions 2 (2020), 76--82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Alessio Cornia, Kerstin Dressel, and Patricia Pfeil. 2016. Risk cultures and dominant approaches towards disasters in seven European countries. Journal of Risk Research 19, 3 (Oct. 2016), 288--304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.961520Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dharma Dailey and Kate Starbird. 2016. Addressing the Information Needs of Crisis-Affected Communities: The Interplay of Legacy Media and Social Media in a Rural Disaster. In The Communication Crisis in America, And How to Fix It. Palgrave Macmillan US, 285--303. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94925-0_18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Irina Dallo and Michèle Marti. 2021. Why should I use a multi-hazard app? Assessing the public's information needs and app feature preferences in a participatory process. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 57 (April 2021), 102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102197Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Diana Fischer, Johannes Putzke-Hattori, and Kai Fischbach. 2019. Crisis Warning Apps: Investigating the Factors Influencing Usage and Compliance with Recommendations for Action. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Tung Bui (Ed.). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.079Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jasmin Haunschild, Marc-André Kaufhold, and Christian Reuter. 2020. Sticking with Landlines? Citizens' Use and Perception of Social Media in Emergencies and Expectations Towards Emergency Services in Germany. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI). AIS Electronic Library.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Amanda L Hughes, Leysia Palen, Jeannette Sutton, Sophia B Liu, and Sarah Vieweg. 2008. Site-seeing in disaster: An examination of on-line social convergence. In Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference. 44--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bronwyn Jones and Rhianne Jones. 2019. Public Service Chatbots: Automating Conversation with BBC News. Digital Journalism 7, 8 (2019), 1032--1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1609371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Marc-André Kaufhold, Jasmin Haunschild, and Christian Reuter. 2020. Warning the Public: A Survey on Attitudes, Expectations and Use of Mobile Crisis Apps in Germany. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). AIS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorenz Cuno Klopfenstein, Saverio Delpriori, Silvia Malatini, and Alessandro Bogliolo. 2017. The rise of bots: A survey of conversational interfaces, patterns, and paradigms. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on designing interactive systems. 555--565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 1 (1977), 159--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen Lou, Edson C Tandoc Jr, Li Xuan Hong, Xiang Yuan Pong, Wan Xin Lye, and Ngiag Gya Sng. 2021. When Motivations Meet Affordances: News Consumption on Telegram. Journalism Studies (2021), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nic Newman, Antonis Kalageropoulos Richard Fletcher, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2015. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. SSRN Electronic Journal (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jakob Ohme, Mariek M. P. Vanden Abeele, Kyle Van Gaeveren, Wouter Durnez, and Lieven De Marez. 2020. Staying Informed and Bridging "Social Distance": Smartphone News Use and Mobile Messaging Behaviors of Flemish Adults during the First Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120950190Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Leysia Palen, Kenneth M Anderson, Gloria Mark, James Martin, Douglas Sicker, Martha Palmer, and Dirk Grunwald. 2010. A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters. ACM-BCS Visions of Computer Science 2010 (2010), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang Sup Park. 2019. Does Too Much News on Social Media Discourage News Seeking? Mediating Role of News Efficacy Between Perceived News Overload and News Avoidance on Social Media. Social Media and Society 5, 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119872956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sejin Park and Elizabeth Johnson Avery. 2016. Effects of Media Channel, Crisis Type and Demographics on Audience Intent to Follow Instructing Information During Crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 26, 1 (Nov. 2016), 69--78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12137Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Moritz Bruno Petzold, Antonia Bendau, Jens Plag, Lena Pyrkosch, Lea Mascarell Maricic, Felix Betzler, Janina Rogoll, Julia Große, and Andreas Ströhle. 2020. Risk, resilience, psychological distress, and anxiety at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Brain and Behavior 10, 9 (July 2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Maxi Rahn, Samuel Tomczyk, Nathalie Schopp, and Silke Schmidt. 2021. Warning Messages in Crisis Communication: Risk Appraisal and Warning Compliance in Severe Weather, Violent Acts, and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (April 2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.557178Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Christian Reuter and Marc-André Kaufhold. 2017. Fifteen years of social media in emergencies: A retrospective review and future directions for crisis Informatics. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 26, 1 (Sept. 2017), 41--57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12196Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Christian Reuter, Marc-André Kaufhold, I. Leopold, and Hannah Knipp. 2017. Katwarn, NInA, or FEMA? Multi-method Study on Distribution, Use, and Public Views on Crisis Apps. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Christian Reuter, Marc-André Kaufhold, Stefka Schmid, Thomas Spielhofer, and Anna Sophie Hahne. 2019. The impact of risk cultures: Citizens' perception of social media use in emergencies across Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 148 (Nov. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119724Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Scott E. Robinson, Jason M. Pudlo, and Wesley Wehde. 2019. The New Ecology of Tornado Warning Information: A Natural Experiment Assessing Threat Intensity and Citizen-to-Citizen Information Sharing. Public Administration Review 79, 6 (Feb. 2019), 905--916. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Elizabeth L. Petrun Sayers, Andrew M. Parker, Rachana Seelam, and Melissa L. Finucane. 2021. How disasters drive media channel preferences: Tracing news consumption before, during, and after Hurricane Harvey. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management (Jan. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Josephine B Schmitt, Christina A Debbelt, and Frank M Schneider. 2018. Too much information? Predictors of information overload in the context of online news exposure. Information, Communication & Society 21, 8 (2018), 1151--1167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jingyuan Jolie Shi, Thanomwong Poorisat, and Charles Salmon. 2018. The Use of Social Networking Sites (SNSs) in Health Communication Campaigns: Review and Recommendations. Health Communication 33 (01 2018), 49--56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242035Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Anselm L. Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2. ed.). Sage Publ, Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Marion Lara Tan, Raj Prasanna, Kristin Stock, Emma Hudson-Doyle, Graham Leonard, and David Johnston. 2017. Mobile applications in crisis informatics literature: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 24 (Sept. 2017), 297--311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Stefan Timmermans and Iddo Tavory. 2012. Theory Construction in Qualitative Research. Sociological Theory 30, 3 (Sept. 2012), 167--186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Christina Viehmann, Marc Ziegele, and Oliver Quiring. 2020. Information use in the Corona crisis. Retrieved December 01, 2020 from https://www.blogs.uni-mainz.de/fb02pubcomsc/research-projects/information-use-in-the-corona-crisis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Citizens' Perceived Information Responsibilities and Information Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GoodIT '21: Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology for Social Good
      September 2021
      345 pages
      ISBN:9781450384780
      DOI:10.1145/3462203

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 September 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Upcoming Conference

      GoodIT '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader