skip to main content
10.1145/3462244.3479896acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Approximating the Mental Lexicon from Clinical Interviews as a Support Tool for Depression Detection

Published:18 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Depression disorder is one of the major causes of disability in the world that can lead to tragic outcomes. In this paper, we propose a method for using an approximation to a mental lexicon to model the communication process of depressed and non-depressed participants in spontaneous North American English clinical interviews. Our approach, inspired by the Lexical Availability theory, identifies the most relevant vocabulary of the interviewed participant, and use it as features in a classification process. We performed an in-depth evaluation on the DAIC-WOZ [20] and the E-DAIC [11] clinical datasets. Obtained results indicate that our approach can compete against recent contextual embeddings when modeling and identifying depression. We show the generalization capabilities of our algorithm using outside data, reaching a macro F1 = 0.83 and F1 = 0.80 in the DAIC-WOZ and E-DAIC datasets respectively. An analysis of our method’s interpretability allows understanding how the classifier is making its decisions. During this process, we observed strong connections between our obtained results and previous research from the psychological field.

References

  1. Mari Aguilera, Clara Paz, Victoria Compañ, Juan Carlos Medina, and Guillem Feixas. 2019. Cognitive rigidity in patients with depression and fibromyalgia. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 19, 2(2019), 160–164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tuka Al Hanai, Mohammad M Ghassemi, and James R Glass. 2018. Detecting Depression with Audio/Text Sequence Modeling of Interviews.. In Interspeech. 1716–1720.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mohammed Al-Mosaiwi and Tom Johnstone. 2018. In an absolute state: Elevated use of absolutist words is a marker specific to anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. Clinical Psychological Science 6, 4 (2018), 529–542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Nancy JC Andreasen and Bruce Pfohl. 1976. Linguistic analysis of speech in affective disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 33, 11 (1976), 1361–1367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Antonio Manuel Ávila Muñoz and José María Sánchez Sáez. 2011. La posición de los vocablos en el cálculo del índice de disponibilidad léxica: procesos de reentrada en las listas del léxico disponible de la ciudad de Málaga. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hennie Brugman and Albert Russel. 2004. Annotating Multi-media/Multi-modal Resources with ELAN. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Lisbon, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sergio G Burdisso, Marcelo Errecalde, and Manuel Montes-y Gómez. 2019. A text classification framework for simple and effective early depression detection over social media streams. Expert Systems with Applications 133 (2019), 182–197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Francisco J. Callealta Barroso and Diego J. Gallego Gallego. 2016. Medidas de disponibilidad léxica: comparabilidad y normalización (Measures of lexical availability: comparability and standardization). Boletín de filología 51, 1 (2016), 39–92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Social Media As a Measurement Tool of Depression in Populations. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (Paris, France) (WebSci ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47–56. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1145/2464464.2464480Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Simon De Deyne, Steven Verheyen, and Gert Storms. 2016. Structure and organization of the mental lexicon: A network approach derived from syntactic dependency relations and word associations. In Towards a theoretical framework for analyzing complex linguistic networks. Springer, 47–79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David DeVault, Ron Artstein, Grace Benn, Teresa Dey, Ed Fast, Alesia Gainer, Kallirroi Georgila, Jon Gratch, Arno Hartholt, Margaux Lhommet, 2014. SimSensei Kiosk: A virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. 1061–1068.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 4171–4186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S Pavankumar Dubagunta, Bogdan Vlasenko, and Mathew Magimai Doss. 2019. Learning Voice Source Related Information for Depression Detection. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 6525–6529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas E Ellis and Billy Rutherford. 2008. Cognition and suicide: Two decades of progress. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy 1, 1 (2008), 47–68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Maitena Etxebarria. 2014. Lexical variation and bilingual education in the Basque country. Spanish in Context 11, 1 (2014), 50–75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Roberto Ferreira and Max S. Echeverría. 2010. Redes semánticas en el léxico disponible de inglés L1 e inglés LE. Onomázein (2010). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=134513546005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy, and Molly Vierhile. 2017. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mental health 4, 2 (2017), e19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Edward A Fox and Joseph A Shaw. 1994. Combination of multiple searches. NIST special publication SP 243 (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Georges Gougenheim, R. Michéa, P. Rivenc, and A. Sauvageot. 1964. L’élaboration du français fondamental (1er degré): étude sur l’établissement d’un vocabulaire et d’une grammaire de base. Vol. 1. Chilton Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonathan Gratch, Ron Artstein, Gale Lucas, Giota Stratou, Stefan Scherer, Angela Nazarian, Rachel Wood, Jill Boberg, David DeVault, Stacy Marsella, David Traum, Skip Rizzo, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2014. The Distress Analysis Interview Corpus of human and computer interviews. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Reykjavik, Iceland, 3123–3128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Natividad Hernández Muñoz. 2010. Social aspects of oral and lexical written production in Spanish. SKY Journal of Linguistics 23 (2010), 101–123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Natividad Hernández-Muñoz, Cristina Izura, and Carmela Tomé. 2014. Cognitive factors of lexical availability in a second language. In Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language. Springer, 169–186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Natividad Hernández Muñoz and Carmela Tomé Cornejo. 2017. Léxico disponible en primera y segunda lengua: bases cognitivas. In Palabras vocabulario léxico: la lexicología aplicada a la didáctica ya la diacronía. Edizioni Ca Foscari, 99–122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Becky Inkster, Shubhankar Sarda, and Vinod Subramanian. 2018. An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (Wysa) for digital mental well-being: real-world data evaluation mixed-methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, 11 (2018), e12106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosa María Jiménez Catalán. 2013. Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language. Vol. 17. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurt Kroenke, Tara W Strine, Robert L Spitzer, Janet BW Williams, Joyce T Berry, and Ali H Mokdad. 2009. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. Journal of affective disorders 114, 1-3 (2009), 163–173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Adrian Pastor López-Monroy, Fabio A. González, Manuel Montes, Hugo Jair Escalante, and Thamar Solorio. 2018. Early Text Classification Using Multi-Resolution Concept Representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1216–1225. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1110Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. David E Losada, Fabio Crestani, and Javier Parapar. 2018. Overview of eRisk: Early Risk Prediction on the Internet. In International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages. Springer, 343–361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. David E. Losada, Fabio Crestani, and Javier Parapar. 2020. eRisk 2020: Self-harm and Depression Challenges. In Advances in Information Retrieval, Joemon M. Jose, Emine Yilmaz, João Magalhães, Pablo Castells, Nicola Ferro, Mário J. Silva, and Flávio Martins (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 557–563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Geral Eduardo Mateus-Ferro, Laura Marcela Castiblanco, and Pedro Augusto Álvarez Bermúdez. 2018. Mecanismos lógicos y analógicos en la producción del léxico disponible. Revista Folios (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Colin D Mathers and Dejan Loncar. 2006. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS medicine 3, 11 (2006), e442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Michelle Morales, Stefan Scherer, and Rivka Levitan. 2018. A Linguistically-Informed Fusion Approach for Multimodal Depression Detection. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Keyboard to Clinic. ACL, New Orleans, LA, 13–24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Heili Orav. 2006. Lexical Knowledge of Personality Traits. In Proceedings of the GWC 2006. 239–343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Michael J Paul and Mark Dredze. 2011. You are what you tweet: Analyzing twitter for public health. In Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Chris Payne. 2016. Lexical availability. English teaching professional102 (2016), 18–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 71, 2001 (2001), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. James W Pennebaker, Matthias R Mehl, and Kate G Niederhoffer. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual review of psychology 54, 1 (2003), 547–577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Marco Antonio Perez Durán. 2019. Un estudio sobre los macrocentros de interés (McI). Una aportación teórica para los estudios actuales de disponibilidad léxica. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 6 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Marco Pérez Durán. 2020. Análisis del léxico disponible del centro de interés del insulto en estudiantes de secundaria de San Luis Potosí, México. Revista de Filología y Lingüística de la Universidad de Costa Rica 46, 1 (mar. 2020), 261–278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Anupama Ray, Siddharth Kumar, Rutvik Reddy, Prerana Mukherjee, and Ritu Garg. 2019. Multi-Level Attention Network Using Text, Audio and Video for Depression Prediction. In Proceedings of the 9th International on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop (Nice, France) (AVEC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Alex Rinaldi, Jean Fox Tree, and Snigdha Chaturvedi. 2020. Predicting Depression in Screening Interviews from Latent Categorization of Interview Prompts. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, Online, 7–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Fabien Ringeval, Björn Schuller, Michel Valstar, Nicholas Cummins, Roddy Cowie, Leili Tavabi, Maximilian Schmitt, Sina Alisamir, Shahin Amiriparian, Eva-Maria Messner, 2019. AVEC 2019 workshop and challenge: state-of-mind, detecting depression with AI, and cross-cultural affect recognition. In Proceedings of the 9th International on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop. 3–12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Stephanie Rude, Eva-Maria Gortner, and James Pennebaker. 2004. Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition & Emotion 18, 8 (2004), 1121–1133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Gabriela Ríos González. 2008. Diferencias léxicas entre el hombre y la mujer en tres centros de interés: Saludos, Temas de conversación y Despedidas. Revista de Filología y Lingüística de la Universidad de Costa Rica 33, 1 (mar. 2008), 151–166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Chris Segrin. 1990. A meta-analytic review of social skill deficits in depression. Communications Monographs 57, 4 (1990), 292–308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Marjana Šifrar Kalan. 2015. Lexical Availability and L2 Vocabulary Acquisition. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 2, 2(2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Urmas Sutrop. 2001. List Task and a Cognitive Salience Index. Field Methods 13, 3 (2001), 263–276. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0101300303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Allison M Tackman, David A Sbarra, Angela L Carey, M Brent Donnellan, Andrea B Horn, Nicholas S Holtzman, To’Meisha S Edwards, James W Pennebaker, and Matthias R Mehl. 2019. Depression, negative emotionality, and self-referential language: A multi-lab, multi-measure, and multi-language-task research synthesis.Journal of personality and social psychology 116, 5(2019), 817.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Yla R Tausczik and James W Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology 29, 1 (2010), 24–54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. John D Teasdale, Jan Scott, Richard G Moore, Hazel Hayhurst, Marie Pope, and Eugene S Paykel. 2001. How does cognitive therapy prevent relapse in residual depression? Evidence from a controlled trial.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 69, 3(2001), 347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Ester Trigo, Manuel-Francisco Romero, and Inmaculada-Clotilde Santos-Díaz. 2019. Empirical approach from lexical availability to the influence of sociolinguistic factors on mastery of spelling / Aproximación empírica desde la disponibilidad léxica a la influencia de los factores sociolingüísticos en el dominio ortográfico. Culture and Education 31, 4 (2019), 814–844. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1659007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Marcel Trotzek, Sven Koitka, and Christoph M Friedrich. 2018. Utilizing neural networks and linguistic metadata for early detection of depression indications in text sequences. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Michel Valstar, Jonathan Gratch, Björn Schuller, Fabien Ringeval, Denis Lalanne, Mercedes Torres Torres, Stefan Scherer, Giota Stratou, Roddy Cowie, and Maja Pantic. 2016. Avec 2016: Depression, mood, and emotion recognition workshop and challenge. In Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on audio/visual emotion challenge. ACM, 3–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 5998–6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Esaú Villatoro-Tello, Pavankumar Dubagunta, Julian Fritsch, Gabriela Ramírez-de-la Rosa, Petr Motlicek, and Mathew Magimai.-Doss. 2021. Late Fusion of the Available Lexicon and Raw Waveform-based Acoustic Modeling for Depression and Dementia Recognition. In Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2021. ISCA-International Speech Communication Association 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Esaú Villatoro-Tello, Gabriela Ramírez-de-la Rosa, and Héctor Jiménez-Salazar. 2017. UAM’s Participation at CLEF eRisk 2017 task: Towards Modelling Depressed Blogers.. In CLEF (Working Notes).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Charles Welch, Allison Lahnala, Veronica Perez-Rosas, Siqi Shen, Sarah Seraj, Larry An, Kenneth Resnicow, James Pennebaker, and Rada Mihalcea. 2020. Expressive Interviewing: A Conversational System for Coping with COVID-19. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for COVID-19 (Part 2) at EMNLP 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. World Health Organization. 2017. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders Global Health Estimates. Retrieved May 11, 2021 from ht+tps://www.who.int/mental_health/management/depression/prevalence_global_health_estimates/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Til Wykes, Jessica Lipshitz, and Stephen M Schueller. 2019. Towards the design of ethical standards related to digital mental health and all its applications. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry 6, 3 (2019), 232–242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Shweta Yadav, Jainish Chauhan, Joy Prakash Sain, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, Amit Sheth, and Jeremiah Schumm. 2020. Identifying Depressive Symptoms from Tweets: Figurative Language Enabled Multitask Learning Framework. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain (Online), 696–709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Ziheng Zhang, Weizhe Lin, Mingyu Liu, and Marwa Mahmoud. 2020. Multimodal deep learning framework for mental disorder recognition. In 2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2020). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICMI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
    October 2021
    876 pages
    ISBN:9781450384810
    DOI:10.1145/3462244

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format