skip to main content
10.1145/3462676.3462678acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Customization with the Inventory Management Module: Case Study of Rumah Yatim

Published:07 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Zakat plays a very important role in improving people's well-being. This is based on BAZNAS Survey 2016 data, the Zakat potential in Indonesia may reach Rs. 286 trillion. So, in fact, zakat collection is only $ 6 trillion, not even 5%. Therefore, relevant authorities must properly collect, manage and distribute zakat funds. In this case, Rumah Yateem, one of the zakat institutions operating in the country, needs to ensure that the process is properly implemented by supporting the ERP system in accounting. Job. Customization of an ERP system enables real-time business process automation and simultaneous integrations. In this study, we implemented it using the Odoo app stock management module. This was done using Odoo QuickStart method as best practice provided in the literature, which is expected to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the business process for coordination in order achieve the goals of the institution.

References

  1. Banerjee, Blockchain Technology: Supply Chain Insights from ERP, 1st ed., vol. 111. Elsevier Inc., 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Lubis and A. H. Azizah, “Towards achieving the efficiency in zakat management system: Interaction design for optimization in indonesia,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 886, no. March 2017, pp. 289–301, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1628-9_26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Lubis, N. I. Yaacob, Y. Omar, and A. R. A. Dahlan, “Enhancement of zakat distribution management system: case study in Malaysia,” Int. Manag. Conf. 2011 Proc., pp. 1–10, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://irep.iium.edu.my/4261/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. I. Halimatusa'diyah, “Zakat and Social Protection: The Relationship Between Socio-religious CSOs and the Government in Indonesia,” J. Civ. Soc., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 79–99, 2015, doi: 10.1080/17448689.2015.1019181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. S. Rahman, “ODU Digital Commons At the Hands of Fate: The Political Economy of Islamic Insurance in Indonesia , Malaysia , and Pakistan , C . 1980 to the Present,” 2019, doi: 10.25777/391r-ej57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. K. Firdaus, W. Puspitasari, and M. Lubis, “Enterprise Resource Planning System Implementation With Purchase Management Module In Lembaga Amil Zakat Nasional,” Proc. 2019 4th Int. Conf. Informatics Comput. ICIC 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICIC47613.2019.8985878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Sonial Manara, A. Rachman Eka Permata, and R. G. Heru Pranjoto, “Strategy Model for Increasing the Potential of Zakat through the Crowdfunding-Zakat System to overcome Poverty in Indonesia,” Int. J. Zakat, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 17–31, 2018, doi: 10.37706/ijaz.v3i4.104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N. F. Takril and N. F. Othman, “Effectiveness of Zakat Collection and Distribution of Zakat counter at higher learning Institutions,” Int. J. Islam. Econ. Financ. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 91–106, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Widiastuti, I. Auwalin, L. N. Rani, and M. Ubaidillah Al Mustofa, “A mediating effect of business growth on zakat empowerment program and mustahiq's welfare,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1882039.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. Gantira Mira, M. Lubis, W. Puspitasari, and A. Ridho Lubis, “ERP system implementation with accounting modules in national amil zakat institutions,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 801, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/801/1/012117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. van Geest, B. Tekinerdogan, and C. Catal, “Design of a reference architecture for developing smart warehouses in industry 4.0,” Comput. Ind., vol. 124, p. 103343, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Jayaratne , “A data integration platform for patient-centered e-healthcare and clinical decision support,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 92, pp. 996–1008, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.07.061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Q. Zhu and M. Kouhizadeh, “Blockchain Technology, Supply Chain Information, and Strategic Product Deletion Management,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2019, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2019.2898178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Tasnawijitwong and T. Samanchuen, “Open source ERP selection for small and medium enterprises by using analytic hierarchy process,” Proc. 2018 5th Int. Conf. Bus. Ind. Res. Smart Technol. Next Gener. Information, Eng. Bus. Soc. Sci. ICBIR 2018, pp. 382–386, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICBIR.2018.8391226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. G. Chofreh, F. A. Goni, and J. J. Klemeš, “A roadmap for Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning systems implementation (part III),” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 174, no. Part III, pp. 1325–1337, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Shafi , “Measuring performance through enterprise resource planning system implementation,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 6691–6702, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. M. Langer, Information technology and organizational learning: Managing behavioral change in the digital age, third edition. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. O. Strandhagen, L. R. Vallandingham, G. Fragapane, J. W. Strandhagen, A. B. H. Stangeland, and N. Sharma, “Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models,” Adv. Manuf., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 359–369, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40436-017-0198-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. D. Nakandala, H. Lau, and P. K. C. Shum, “A lateral transshipment model for perishable inventory management,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 55, no. 18, pp. 5341–5354, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1312587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Hintsch, A. Khan, A. Siegling, and K. Turowski, “Application Software in Cloud-Ready Data Centers: A Survey,” pp. 261–288, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65082-1_12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Reis, Odoo 12 Development Essentials: Fast-track Your Odoo Development Skills to Build Powerful Business Applications. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Syafiera, M. Lubis, R. W. Witjaksono, and H. D. Anggana, “The Means of Engagement (MOE) Model of the Agreement towards the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation,” Proc. 2019 4th Int. Conf. Informatics Comput. ICIC 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICIC47613.2019.8985900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. J. Prasetyo, M. Lubis, R. W. Witjaksono, and A. H. Azizah, “Critical Failure Factors in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation: Case Study of PT.Toyota Astra Motor Indonesia,” Proc. 2019 4th Int. Conf. Informatics Comput. ICIC 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICIC47613.2019.8985720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. Lubis, I. R. Wardhani, and W. Witjaksono, “Examining the Means of Engagement (MOE) for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Adoption in Indonesia: Factors and Measures,” 2019 3rd Int. Conf. Electr. Telecommun. Comput. Eng. ELTICOM 2019 - Proc., pp. 21–26, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ELTICOM47379.2019.8943865.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Y. B. Islami, M. Lubis, R. W. Witjaksono, and A. H. Azizah, “Development of the Means of Engagement (MOE) Model in the Context of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) for User Acceptance Level,” 2019 7th Int. Conf. Cyber IT Serv. Manag. CITSM 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CITSM47753.2019.8965366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. W. Ike Wahyuning, M. Lubis, W. Witjaksono, and A. H. Azizah, “Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) using Integrated Model of Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 2: Case Study of PT. Toyota Astra Motor,” 2019 7th Int. Conf. Cyber IT Serv. Manag. CITSM 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CITSM47753.2019.8965342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Lubis, D. Novalia, and Puspita, “Development of Security Awareness Domain and Resources (SADAR) Framework: Capacity Metrics to Evaluate Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation,” in 2020 4rd International Conference on Electrical, Telecommunication and Computer Engineering (ELTICOM), 2020, pp. 170–175, doi: 10.1109/ELTICOM50775.2020.9230523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Aini, M. Lubis, R. W. Witjaksono, and A. Hanifatul Azizah, “Analysis of Critical Success Factors on ERP Implementation in PT. Toyota Astra Motor Using Extended Information System Success Model,” Mecn. 2020 - Int. Conf. Mech. Electron. Comput. Ind. Technol., pp. 370–375, 2020, doi: 10.1109/MECnIT48290.2020.9166653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. M. Lubis, A. Ridho Lubis, and A. Almaarif, “Comparison of the Approach in the Zakat Management System,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1235, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1235/1/012048.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. F. Johari, M. R. Muhammad, and A. F. Mohd Ali, “A review on literatures of zakat between 2003-2013,” Libr. Philos. Pract., vol. 2014, no. 1, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. S. A. Shaikh, “Zakat Collectible in OIC Countries for Poverty Alleviation: A Primer on Empirical Estimation,” Int. J. Zakat, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–35, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Saidurrahman, “The politics of zakat management in Indonesia: The tension between BAZ and LAZ,” J. Indones. Islam, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 366–382, 2013, doi: 10.15642/JIIS.2013.7.2.366-382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICECC '21: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control Engineering
    April 2021
    122 pages
    ISBN:9781450389129
    DOI:10.1145/3462676

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format