skip to main content
10.1145/3463531.3463555acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicettConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Reasons and Countermeasures of Chinese College Students ' unintentional Plagiarism

Published:20 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Drawing on other countries’ existing research results and experience and combining with the actual situation of China, the status of Chinese college students ' unintentional plagiarism was reviewed. The main reason is cultural diversity; lack of correct citation skills; subconscious misjudgment and wide application of network information. On the foundation of these reasons, the corresponding preventive measures are put forward: culturing students’ authorship and improving academic writing skills; valuing and cultivating teachers ' academic integrity; An academic integrity committee of teachers and students.

References

  1. Park, C. 2003. In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students–literature and lessons. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 28(5), 471-488Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, E. S. 2006. Can paraphrasing practice help students define plagiarism? College Student Journal, 40(2)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Elander, J., Pittam, G., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. 2010. Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 157-171. http://doi: 10.1080/02602930802687745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ng, Y. M., & Yip, C. W. 2019. A 3-step teaching approach for a blended learning of 'understanding and avoiding unintentional plagiarism'. Nurse Education in Practice, 41, 3. http://doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102643Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ewing, H., Mathieson, K., Anast, A., & Roehling, T. 2019. Student and faculty perceptions of plagiarism in health sciences education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 79-88. http://doi: 10.1080/0309877x.2017.1356913Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee, Y. 2011. Understanding anti-plagiarism software adoption: An extended protection motivation theory perspective. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 361-369. http://doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.07.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Heckler, N. C., Rice, M., & Hobson Bryan, C. 2013. Turnitin systems: A deterrent to plagiarism in college classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 229-248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lynch, J., Everett, B., Ramjan, L. M., Callins, R., Glew, P., & Salamonson, Y. 2017. Plagiarism in nursing education: an integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(19-20), 2845-2864. http://doi: 10.1111/jocn.13629Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yang, A., Stockwell, S., & McDonnell, L. 2019. Writing in your own voice: An intervention that reduces plagiarism and common writing problems in students' scientific writing. Biochem Mol Biol Educ, 47(5), 589-598. http://doi: 10.1002/bmb.21282Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kier, C. A. 2019. Plagiarism Intervention Using a Game-Based Tutorial in an Online Distance Education Course. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17(4), 429-439. http://doi: 10.1007/s10805-019-09340-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Smedley, A., Crawford, T., & Cloete, L. 2020. An Evaluation of an Extended Intervention to Reduce Plagiarism in Bachelor of Nursing Students. Nurs Educ Perspect, 41(2), 106-108. http://doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000492Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Stark, L.-J., & Perfect, T. J. 2007. Whose idea was that? Source monitoring for idea ownership following elaboration. Memory, 15(7), 776-783Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. DeLong, D. 2012. Propensity toward Unintentional Plagiarism. Global Education Journal, 2012(4)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ballantine, J., & McCourt Larres, P. 2012. Perceptions of authorial identity in academic writing among undergraduate accounting students: implications for unintentional plagiarism. Accounting Education, 21(3), 289-306Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P., & Unit, S. o. t. Q. R. M. C. 1997. Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in higher education, 22(2), 187-203Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Badea, O. 2017. Do medical students really understand plagiarism? - Case study. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, 58(1), 293-296Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bultas, M. W., Schmuke, A. D., Davis, R. L., & Palmer, J. L. 2017. Crossing the “line”: college students and academic integrity in nursing. Nurse education today, 56, 57-62Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fontana, J. S. 2009. Nursing faculty experiences of students’ academic dishonesty. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(4), 181-185Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Albluwi, I. 2020. Plagiarism in Programming Assessments: A Systematic Review. Acm Transactions on Computing Education, 20(1), 28. http://doi: Artn 610.1145/3371156Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., . . . van Haeringen, K. 2019. Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837-1856. http://doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. 2010. Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463-481. http://doi: 10.1080/03075070903096508Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shi, L. 2006. Cultural backgrounds and textual appropriation. Language Awareness, 15(4), 264-282Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mundava, M., & Chaudhuri, J. 2007. Understanding plagiarism: The role of librarians at the University of Tennessee in assisting students to practice fair use of information. College & Research Libraries News, 68(3), 170-173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Liu, D. 2005. Plagiarism in ESOL students: Is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit? ELT journal, 59(3), 234-241Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ballantine, J., Guo, X., Larres, P., & Yu, M. 2018. Chinese authorial identity: a model for scoring the Student Authorship Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2385-2397. http://doi: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1333493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Martin, D. E. 2012. Culture and unethical conduct: Understanding the impact of individualism and collectivism on actual plagiarism. Management Learning, 43(3), 261-273Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Knowlton, M., & Collins, S. B. 2017. Foreign-Educated Graduate Nursing Students and Plagiarism. J Nurs Educ, 56(4), 211-214. http://doi: 10.3928/01484834-20170323-04Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Orim, S.-M. I., Davies, J. W., Borg, E., & Glendinning, I. 2013. Exploring Nigerian postgraduate students' experience of plagiarism: A phenomenographic case study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9(1)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. 2016. A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students' attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 231-246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Lei, J., & Hu, G. 2015. Chinese university EFL teachers’ perceptions of plagiarism. Higher Education, 70(3), 551-565Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Wilkinson, J. 2009. Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98-105Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Pennycook, A. 1996. Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL quarterly, 30(2), 201-230Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Fawley, N. E. 2007. Plagiarism pitfalls: addressing cultural differences in the misuse of sources. International Journal of Learning, 14(7), 71Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Roig, M. 1999. When college students' attempts at paraphrasing become instances of potential plagiarism. Psychological Reports, 84(3), 973-982Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Bennett*, R. 2005. Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post‐1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137-162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Devlin, M., & Gray, K. 2007. In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. High Education Research & Development, 26(2), 181-198Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Michalska, A. 2017. LAGIARISM? I KNOW A DEFINITION, BUT I DON'TKNOW WHAT IT MEANS. the 3rd International Conference “Plagiarism across Europe and beyond 2017”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sterngold, A. 2004. Confronting plagiarism: How conventional teaching invites cyber-cheating. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(3), 16-21Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Bertram Gallant, T., Picciotto, M., Bozinovic, G., & Tour, E. 2019. Plagiarism or not? investigation of Turnitin®‐detected similarity hits in biology laboratory reports. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(4), 370-379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. 1989. Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(3), 432Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Stark, L.-J., Perfect, T., & Newstead, S. 2005. When elaboration leads to appropriation: Unconscious plagiarism in a creative task. Memory, 13(6), 561-573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Moss, S. A., White, B., & Lee, J. 2018. A Systematic Review Into the Psychological Causes and Correlates of Plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 28(4), 261-283. http://doi: 10.1080/10508422.2017.1341837Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Perfect, T. J., Field, I., & Jones, R. 2009. Source credibility and idea improvement have independent effects on unconscious plagiarism errors in recall and generate-new tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 267Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Howard, J. D. 1999. The credibility of a source influences the rate of unconscious plagiarism. Memory, 7(3), 293-308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Perfect, T. J., & Stark, L.-J. 2008. Why do I always have the best ideas? The role of idea quality in unconscious plagiarism. Memory, 16(4), 386-394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Brédart, S., Lampinen, J., & Defeldre, A.-C. 2003. Phenomenal characteristics of cryptomnesia. Memory, 11(1), 1-11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. World internet users and 2020 population stats. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood, G. 2004. Academic original sin: Plagiarism, the internet, and librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(3), 237-242Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Greenwood, M., Walkem, K., Smith, L. M., Shearer, T., & Stirling, C. 2014. Postgraduate nursing student knowledge, attitudes, skills, and confidence in appropriately referencing academic work. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(8), 447-452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. McLafferty, C. L., & Foust, K. M. 2004. Electronic plagiarism as a college instructor's nightmare—Prevention and detection. Journal of Education for Business, 79(3), 186-190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Gabriel, T. 2010. Plagiarism lines blur for students in digital age. The New York Times, 1(8)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Rimer, S. 2003. A campus fad that's being copied: Internet plagiarism. The New York TimesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosol, S., & Cyphert, D. 2018. Profiling Potential Plagiarizers: A Mastery Learning Instructional Technique to Enhance Competency. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 81(3), 281-303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Jones, D. L. 2011. Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Cressey, D. R. 1953. Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlementGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Choo, F., & Tan, K. 2008. The effect of fraud triangle factors on students’ cheating behaviors. Advances in Accounting Education, 9, 205-220Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Park, C. 2004. Rebels without a clause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291-306Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Macdonald, R., & Carroll, J. 2006. Plagiarism—a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233-245Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. 2009. Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 153-170. http://doi: 90967451010.1080/03075070802528270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Hill, C. 2010. Promoting academic integrity in online education. Madison, Wisconsin, US: Magna Publications, Inc. Retrieved December, 18, 2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Tatum, H., & Schwartz, B. M. 2017. Honor Codes: Evidence Based Strategies for Improving Academic Integrity. Theory into Practice, 56(2), 129-135. http://doi: 10.1080/00405841.2017.1308175Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Murdock, T. B., Beauchamp, A. S., & Hinton, A. M. 2008. Predictors of cheating and cheating attributions: Does classroom context influence cheating and blame for cheating? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(4), 477Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Anderman, E. M., & Won, S. 2019. Academic Cheating in Disliked Classes. Ethics & Behavior, 29(1), 1-22. http://doi: 10.1080/10508422.2017.1373648Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Keener, T. A., Peralta, M. G., Smith, M., Swager, L., Ingles, J., Wen, S. J., & Barbier, M. 2019. Student and faculty perceptions: appropriate consequences of lapses in academic integrity in health sciences education. Bmc Medical Education, 19, 9. http://doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1645-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Robinson, J. A., & Glanzer, P. L. 2017. Building a culture of academic integrity: What students perceive and need. College Student Journal, 51(2), 209-221Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Stonecypher, K., & Willson, P. 2014. Academic policies and practices to deter cheating in nursing education. Nursing education perspectives, 35(3), 167-179Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. 2006. Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational psychologist, 41(3), 129-145Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Weidler, B. J., Multhaup, K. S., & Faust, M. E. 2012. Accountability Reduces Unconscious Plagiarism. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 626-634. http://doi: 10.1002/acp.2842Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Macale, L., Ghezzi, V., Rocco, G., Fida, R., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. 2017. Academic dishonesty among Italian nursing students: A longitudinal study. Nurse education today, 50, 57-61Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Sheard, J., & Dick, M. 2011. Computing student practices of cheating and plagiarism: a decade of change Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 233-237).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. King, C. G., Guyette Jr, R. W., & Piotrowski, C. 2009. Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students' views. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), n1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Borg, E. 2009. Local plagiarisms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 415-426Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Yang, F.-P., Jiau, H. C., & Ssu, K.-F. 2014. Beyond plagiarism: an active learning method to analyze causes behind code-similarity. Computers & Education, 70, 161-172Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICETT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies
    April 2021
    163 pages
    ISBN:9781450389662
    DOI:10.1145/3463531

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 July 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format